IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,907,548
Granted Patent B2
US 7,907,548 · App. 12/444,557 · Granted Mar 15, 2011

Method for electing aggregator nodes in a network

Assignee: NEC Europe Ltd.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,907,548
App. No.
12/444,557
Granted
Mar 15, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for electing aggregator nodes in a network, wherein the network includes a plurality of sensor nodes to measure data, and at least one of the sensor nodes functioning as aggregator node to aggregate sensored data obtained by at least a subset of the sensor nodes, the network further including at least one sink node to collect data aggregated by the aggregator nodes, the method including: establishing pairwise secret keys between a current aggregator node and each sensor node of the subset of sensor nodes; at each of the sensor nodes of the subset, choosing a random number and encrypting the random number using the established key; providing a communication chain between the sensor nodes of the subset and summing the encrypted random numbers of all sensor nodes of the subset; and determining a new aggregator node on the basis of the resulting sum according to a predefined calculation scheme.

Claims (24)

1. A method for electing aggregator nodes in a network, wherein the network ( 1 ) comprises a plurality of sensor nodes (S i ) to measure data, and wherein at least one of the sensor nodes (S i ) functions as aggregator node (A) to aggregate sensored data obtained by at least a subset of the sensor nodes (S i ), and wherein the network further comprises at least one sink node ( 2 ) to collect data aggregated by the aggregator nodes (A), the method comprising:

establishing pairwise secret keys (k i ) between a current aggregator node (A t ) and each sensor node (S i ) of the subset of sensor nodes from which the current aggregator node (A t ) obtains sensored data;

at each of the sensor nodes (S i ) of said subset, choosing a random number (r i ) and encrypting the random number (r i ) using the established key (k i );

providing a communication chain between the sensor nodes (S i ) of said subset and summing the encrypted random numbers (r i ) of all sensor nodes (S i ) of said subset; and

determining a new aggregator node (A t+1 ) on the basis of the resulting sum according to a predefined calculation scheme.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the current aggregator node (A t ), in the context of the key establishment, broadcasts a multitude of data pairs, each data pair comprising a key (k i ) and an identifier (ID i ), respectively, in a concealed manner to all sensor nodes (S i ) of said subset.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset chooses randomly one data pair from the multitude of data pairs and breaks the concealment to obtain the key (k i ).

4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the concealment of the broadcasted data pairs is achieved by way of a preferably lightweight encryption.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the broadcasted data pairs are encrypted with a weak block cipher or using a short key.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset chooses randomly one data pair from the multitude of data pairs and breaks the concealment to obtain the key (k i ).

7. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the number of data pairs broadcasted by the current aggregator node (A t ) is specified according to given security requirements.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset chooses randomly one data pair from the multitude of data pairs and breaks the concealment to obtain the key (k i ).

9. The method according to claim 2 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) broadcasts the identifier (ID i ) of its chosen data pair as a commitment.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset chooses randomly one data pair from the multitude of data pairs and breaks the concealment to obtain the key (k i ).

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the order of the sensor nodes (S i ) within the communication chain is determined according to a well defined rule.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein an encryption scheme E used for encrypting the random numbers (r i ) under the keys (k i ) is homomorphic both with respect to the random numbers (r i ) and to the keys (k i ).

13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein, after completing the summation of the encrypted random numbers (r i ), the current aggregator node (A t ) broadcasts the established keys (k i ) to all sensor nodes (S i ) of said subset.

14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein a maximum allowed time Δt is defined between the moment of broadcasting the data pairs and the moment of broadcasting the established keys (k i ).

15. The method according to claim 13 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset sums the established keys (k i ) and applies the resulting sum (k) to decrypt the sum of the encrypted random values (r i ).

16. The method according to claim 12 , wherein each sensor node (S i ) of said subset sums the established keys (k i ) and applies the resulting sum (k) to decrypt the sum of the encrypted random values (r i ).

17. The method according to claim 16 , wherein a maximum allowed time Δt is defined between the moment of broadcasting the data pairs and the moment of broadcasting the established keys (k i ).

18. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sensor node (S i ) of said subset for which it holds that i=R mod n, with R denoting the sum of the random values (r i ) is determined as new aggregator node (A t+1 ) wherein R mod n represents the remainder when R is divided by n, in accordance with modular arithmetic.

19. The method according to claim 18 , wherein a maximum allowed time Δt is defined between the moment of broadcasting the data pairs and the moment of broadcasting the established keys (k i ).

20. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the election process is aborted and restarted from the beginning if at least one sensor node (S i ) registers any irregularities.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2012
From: NEC EUROPE, LTD.
To: NEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029254/0761 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2009
From: WESTHOFF, DIRK; ARMKNECHT, FREDERICK
To: NEC EUROPE, LTD.
Reel/Frame 022523/0288 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100098090A1 · Apr 22, 2010