Casing thickness evaluation method
Evaluating casing thickness by inducing SH0 and SH1 modes of a shear wave in the casing. The SH0 group velocity and SH1 mode group velocity (Vg) are measured and the measured SH0 mode group velocity is assigned as the tubular material shear velocity (Vs). A shear wave wavelength λ from the ratio of SH0 mode frequency (f o ) and the measured SH0 group velocity is estimated. The tubular thickness (d) is estimated from the estimated shear wave wavelength λ. The transmitter can be calibrated to operate at an optimum frequency.
1. A method of evaluating a tubular used in hydrocarbon production, the method comprising:
inducing a shear wave SH0 mode and a shear wave SH1 mode in the tubular;
measuring the SH0 mode group velocity;
measuring the SH1 mode group velocity (V g );
assigning the measured SH0 mode group velocity as the tubular material shear velocity (V s );
estimating a shear wave wavelength λ from the ratio of SH0 mode frequency (f o ) and the measured SH0 group velocity; and
estimating the tubular thickness (d) from the estimated shear wave wavelength λ.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating the tubular thickness (d) using the relationship: d=0.5λ/((V s /V g ) 2 −1) 1/2 ).
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising inducing additional shear waves in the tubular over a range of frequencies, monitoring the shear waves' propagation in the tubular, evaluating the signal to noise ratio of monitored waves at selected frequencies, adjusting the tool to induce shear waves at the selected frequency having the largest signal to noise ratio.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising inducing a shear wave at the selected frequency having the largest signal to noise ratio, measuring the SH0 mode group velocity, and re-estimating the shear wave wavelength λ based on the measured SH0 mode group velocity.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tubular comprises an annular member selected from the list consisting of casing lining a wellbore and production tubing disposed in a wellbore.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising inserting into the tubular a tool having an electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) that includes a magnet array having at least three rows of magnets.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the magnetic rows are aligned substantially parallel with the tubular axis.
8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the EMAT lies in a plane substantially perpendicular to the tubular axis, and wherein the shear wave is monitored within the plane at about 120° along the tubular circumference away from the EMAT.
9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the EMAT lies in a plane substantially perpendicular to the tubular axis, and wherein the shear wave is monitored within the plane at about 240° along the tubular circumference away from the EMAT.
10. The method of claim 6 , wherein the magnet array comprises up to five rows of magnets.