IP Library Granted Patent US 8,083,099
Granted Patent B2
US 8,083,099 · App. 11/988,815 · Granted Dec 27, 2011

Method and device for producing a multicomponent compound

Assignee: Ernst Muhlbauer GmbH & Co. KG
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,083,099
App. No.
11/988,815
Granted
Dec 27, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for producing a multicomponent compound involves pressing components out of cartridges by means of pistons. The method has particular applicability in connection with dental applications. The method prevents pressing the components initially under high pressures. At the beginning of the pressing-out process, a pressure lower than the characteristic pressing-out pressure of the components from the cartridges is employed. Feed speeds are adjusted to constant value as a function of the pressing-out behavior of the components which are compared with stored or calculated values for a known material.

Claims (12)

1. A method for producing a multicomponent compound by pressing its components out of cartridges by means of pistons in a pressing-out process and by mixing the components, characterized in that each piston has a feed movement at a plurality of speeds produced by a drive having a load state and the piston moves without contacting a component in a cartridge until the piston initially contacts the component in a relatively low contact force, and at the beginning of the pressing-out process, the cartridge component is pressed out with a low pressing-out pressure, and the cartridge component is subsequently pressed out at a relatively high pressing-out pressure.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the load state of the drive is measured, in the event of an increase of the load state, the feed movement is ended, the piston is retracted a short distance and only then is the feed movement for the normal pressing-out process started.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , characterized in that the drive is powered by electric current consumption and the load state of the drive is detected by measuring the current consumption.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2 , characterized in that the load state of the drive is determined using mechanical means.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , characterized in that the components have a pressing-out behavior and an adjustment of the feed speeds to constant values takes place as a function of the pressing-out behavior of the components, which is compared with stored or calculated values for known materials.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , in which the components are mixed with a dynamic mixer after being pressed out of the cartridges, characterized in that the mixer is driven first from the moment at which one or more pistons reach the load state.

7. The method as claimed in claim 2 , characterized in that the components have a pressing-out behavior and an adjustment of the feed speeds to constant values takes place as a function of the pressing-out behavior of the components, which is compared with stored or calculated values for known materials.

8. The method as claimed in claim 3 , characterized in that the components have a pressing-out behavior and an adjustment of the feed speeds to constant values takes place as a function of the pressing-out behavior of the components, which is compared with stored or calculated values for known materials.

9. The method as claimed in claim 4 , characterized in that the components have a pressing-out behavior and an adjustment of the feed speeds to constant values takes place as a function of the pressing-out behavior of the components, which is compared with stored or calculated values for known materials.

10. The method as claimed in claim 2 , in which the components are mixed with a dynamic mixer after being pressed out of the cartridges, characterized in that the mixer is driven first from the moment at which one or more pistons reach the load state.

11. The method as claimed in claim 3 , in which the components are mixed with a dynamic mixer after being pressed out of the cartridges, characterized in that the mixer is driven first from the moment at which one or more pistons reach the load state.

12. The method as claimed in claim 4 , in which the components are mixed with a dynamic mixer after being pressed out of the cartridges, characterized in that the mixer is driven first from the moment at which one or more pistons reach the load state.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 15, 2019
From: ERNST MUHLBAUER GMBH & CO. KG
To: MUHLBAUER TECHNOLOGY GMBH
Reel/Frame 048609/0370 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2009
From: MEYER, SVEN; HOHNK, HANS-DIETER; WEIHRAUCH, MATTHIAS
To: ERNST MUEHLBAUER GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 022391/0697 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2005 033 261 · Jul 15, 2005 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090145921A1 · Jun 11, 2009