IP Library Granted Patent US 8,099,266
Granted Patent B2
US 8,099,266 · App. 11/661,818 · Granted Jan 17, 2012

Method and system for the design of an oil well

Assignee: Drilling Systems Ltd
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,099,266
App. No.
11/661,818
Granted
Jan 17, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention is concerned with the design of oil wells by defining a number of design parameters, some of which are interdependent. The invention makes use of successive optimizations. Input data are selected for a first parameter and varied to achieve a first optimization. The process is repeated for a second parameter whose input data includes the first parameter, and then repeated for each other of the defined parameters. The design parameters may be presented to the user via a graphical interface such as a virtual reality view.

Claims (31)

1. A computer-implemented method of designing an oil well, comprising:

(a) defining a plurality of design parameters each of which is determined by a number of input data, the input data for at least some of the parameters including one or more of the other parameters;

(b) providing, for each of the design parameters, conditions or constraints which must be met;

(c) using a microprocessor, selecting input data for a first design parameter such that the parameter falls within the conditions or constraints;

(d) using a microprocessor, varying the input data for the first design parameter to achieve an initial optimisation of the parameter;

(e) using a microprocessor, for a second design parameter whose input data includes the first parameter, selecting other input data such that the second parameter falls within the conditions or constraints;

(f) using a microprocessor, varying said other input data for the second design parameter to achieve an initial optimisation of the parameter;

(g) using a microprocessor, varying the input data for the first parameter to further optimise the second parameter; and

(h) repeating steps (e) to (g) for the remaining design parameters,

wherein the design parameters fall within the conditions or constraints to be met for designing an oil well.

2. A computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , in which the design parameters are selected from the group consisting of:

(a) designing a well path from the surface to and through a reservoir;

(b) designing a casing scheme for a placement, size and material characteristics of a casing cemented in a well;

(c) designing a drill string, bottom hole assembly and drill bit selection for each section of a well;

(d) calculating static and dynamic frictional drag in the well bore due to movement of a casing and/or drill string during rotary operations;

(e) designing a drilling fluid and determination of its rheological properties;

(f) designing a drilling fluid, flow rate, flow regime and pressure regime along a drill string, through a bit and along an annulus;

(g) managing pressure in a wellbore and a balance between wellbore pressure, formation fluid pressure and formation fracture pressure.

3. A system for use in oil well design, comprising:

a database storing a plurality of design parameters each of which is determined by a number of input data, the input data for at least some of the parameters including one or more other parameters;

the database also storing for each parameter conditions or constraints which must be met;

means for selecting input data for each of the parameters;

a calculating module for calculating a selected parameter from its input data; and

an optimising module for optimising a given parameter by altering the input data of another parameter which forms an input to said given parameter,

wherein the design parameters provided by the system are for an oil well design, such that the design parameters fall within the conditions or constraints to be met.

4. The system of claim 3 , in which the means for selecting input data comprises a manual input device such as a keyboard.

5. The system of claim 3 , in which the means for selecting input data comprises an input data database from which items may be selected by a user.

6. The system of claim 3 , further comprising a graphical user interface adapted to present the design parameters to the user.

7. The system of claim 6 , in which the graphical user interface is adapted to display the degree of system optimisation.

8. The system of claim 7 , in which the degree of system optimisation is displayed by a system of traffic light displays.

9. The system of claim 6 , in which the graphical user interface comprises a virtual reality interface or view.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2009
From: THE ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY
To: DRILLING SYSTEMS LTD
Reel/Frame 022823/0098 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2007
From: BURGE, PHILIP M.; OYENEYIN, MUFUTAU B.
To: THE ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 019441/0409 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 0419588.9 · Sep 3, 2004 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20080289875A1 · Nov 27, 2008