IP Library Granted Patent US 8,429,431
Granted Patent B2
US 8,429,431 · App. 12/603,322 · Granted Apr 23, 2013

Methods of achieving cognizant power management

Inventors: Naim R. Malik (Somerset, NJ); Christian Paetz (Zwickau, DE); Neil Weinstock (Randolph, NJ); Allen Yang (Bridgewater, NJ); Vsevolod Onyshkevych (Princeton, NJ); Siva Somasundaram (Dayton, NJ)
Assignee: Raritan Americas, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,429,431
App. No.
12/603,322
Granted
Apr 23, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method of increasing the efficiency of overall power utilization in data centers by integrating a power management approach based on a comprehensive, dynamic model of the data center created with integrated environmental and computational power monitoring to correlate power usage with different configurations of business services utilization, with the techniques of CPU level power management.

Claims (34)

1. A method for cognizant power management in a distributed computing system having a plurality of processing units, comprising the steps of:

a. gathering first values of process level information from the plurality of processing units;

b. gathering first values of environmental metrics for the computing system;

c. generating a predictive behavior power utilization model based on the process level information and the environmental metrics;

d. predicting a power utilization of the computing system according to the predictive behavior power utilization model and a distributed load;

e. setting a state in at least one of the plurality of processing units based on the predictive behavior power utilization model;

f. distributing an application load to the computing system based on based on the predictive behavior power utilization model;

g. determining an actual power utilization by gathering second values for the process level information and the environmental metrics; and

h. updating the predictive behavior power utilization model according to actual power utilization when a difference between the actual power utilization and the predicted power utilization exceeds a predetermined threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of processing units includes at least one of a plurality of central processing units, a plurality of functional units within central processing units, and a plurality of hypervisors managing virtual machines.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the state is one of a plurality of performance states.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the frequency of a processing unit.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the voltage of a processing unit.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the frequency and the voltage of a processing unit.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein one of a plurality of performance states includes at least a first performance state and a second performance state, wherein the first performance state can bear a greater computational load than the second state.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the state is one of a plurality of sleep states.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein one of a plurality of sleep states includes at least a first sleep state and second sleep state, wherein the first sleep state has a lower wake up time than the second sleep state.

10. A method for cognizant power management in a distributed computing system comprising the steps of:

a. gathering first values of process level information from the plurality of processing units;

b. gathering first values of environmental metrics for the computing system;

c. generating a predictive behavior power utilization model based on the process level information and the environmental metrics;

d. predicting a power utilization of the computing system according to the predictive behavior power utilization model and a distributed load;

e. setting a state in at least one of the plurality of processing units based on the predictive behavior power utilization model, the setting step including the step of: issuing a software call to an operating system running on the at least one processing unit;

f. distributing an application load to the computing system based on based on the predictive behavior power utilization model;

g. determining an actual power utilization by gathering second values for the process level information and the environmental metrics; and

h. updating the predictive behavior power utilization model according to actual power utilization when a difference between the actual power utilization and the predicted power utilization exceeds a predetermined threshold.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of processing units includes at least one of a plurality of central processing units, a plurality of functional units within central processing units, and a plurality of hypervisors managing virtual machines.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the state is one of a plurality of performance states.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the frequency of a processing unit.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the voltage of a processing unit.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein setting one of a plurality of performance states includes changing the frequency and the voltage of a processing unit.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein one of a plurality of performance states includes at least a first performance state and a second performance state, wherein the first performance state can bear a greater computational load than the second state.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the state is one of a plurality of sleep states.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein one of a plurality of sleep states includes at least a first sleep state and second sleep state, wherein the first sleep state has a lower wake up time than the second sleep state.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2017
From: RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.
To: SUNBIRD SOFTWARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 043331/0421 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2015
From: PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: RARITAN INC; RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.,; RARITAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,; RIIP, INC.
Reel/Frame 036819/0205 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2012
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: RARITAN, INC.; RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.; RIIP, INC.
Reel/Frame 028924/0272 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 10, 2012
From: RARITAN, INC.; RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.; RARITAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RIIP, INC.
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 028924/0527 →
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 11, 2012
From: RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.; RARITAN, INC.; RIIP, INC.; RARITAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
Reel/Frame 028192/0318 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2011
From: MALIK, NAIM R.; PAETZ, CHRISTIAN, DR.; WEINSTOCK, NEIL; YANG, ALLEN; ONYSHKEVYCH, VSEVOLOD; SOMASUNDARAM, SIVA
To: RARITAN AMERICAS, INC.
Reel/Frame 026996/0790 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 12044530 · Mar 7, 2008
Provisional Application 61107172 · Oct 21, 2008
Related Publication 20100235654A1 · Sep 16, 2010