Object sensor

1. In a driver assistance system, a method for determining an object angle for a driver assistance system in a motor vehicle, comprising:

determining, by a computer processor, directional angles of the object with respect to two sensors;

determining, by the processor, the object angle based on the directional angles;

determining, by the processor, a cross-misalignment angle as a difference of the directional angles determined;

determining, by the processor, a validity signal indicating validity of the object angle, based on the cross-misalignment angle and a histogram filter having a plurality of bins that are filled over time; and

compensating, by the processor, for an influence of a misalignment of the sensors on the determined object angle based on the cross-misalignment angle.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the sensors are at a distance from each other, and, for determining the directional angles, the directional angles recorded by the sensors are transposed to a common reference system.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the object angle is determined as an average of the transposed directional angles.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the determination of the validity signal includes identifying which of the bins is a highest filled bin of the histogram filter.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a system angle is determined based on the object angles of a same object at different positions.

6. The method as recited in claim 5 , wherein a system angle is added to both directional angles for compensation of remaining system angle of the sensors.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a compensation angle is determined based on object angles of the same object at different positions, and the compensation angle for compensating for relative misalignment of the sensors is added to the object angle.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the validity signal is determined based on a rate of change of the cross-misalignment angle calculated by the histogram filter.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the validity signal is determined based a variance of the cross-misalignment angle of the histogram.

10. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the validity signal is determined based on a rate of change of a filling status of one of the bins of the histogram.

11. A device for determining an object angle for a driver assistance system in a motor vehicle, comprising:

two sensors for determining directional angles of the object;

a processing device to determine the object angle, based on the directional angles determined;

a subtraction device to determine a cross-misalignment angle from the directional angles determined;

a validator to determine a validity signal indicating validity of the object angle, based on the cross-misalignment angle and a histogram filter having a plurality of bins that are filled over time; and

a compensator to compensate for an influence of a misalignment of the sensors on the determined object angle based on the cross-misalignment angle.

12. The device as recited in claim 11 , wherein the sensors are at a distance from each other, the device further comprising: a transposing device to transpose directional angles recorded by the sensors into a common reference system.

13. A computer-implemented method for determining an object angle for a driver assistance system in a motor vehicle, comprising:

determining, by a computer processor, directional angles of the object with respect to two sensors;

determining, by the processor, the object angle based on the directional angles;

determining, by the processor, a cross-misalignment angle as a difference of the directional angles determined;

determining, by the processor, a validity signal indicating validity of the object angle, based on the cross-misalignment angle;

determining, by the processor, a compensation angle based on object angles of the same object at different positions; and

compensating, by the processor, for an influence of a misalignment of the sensors on the determined object angle by adding the compensation angle to the object angle.

14. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the validity signal is determined using a low-pass filter.

15. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the validity signal is determined using two low-pass filters with different time constants.

16. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 15 , wherein the validity signal is set to indicate a misalignment response to a determination that values provided by the two low-pass filters differ by more than a predetermined measure.