Variable load line gas curve intercept method to optimize system efficiency
The operation of gas discharge devices involves stabilizing drive stage with a highly dynamic load exhibiting both negative resistance and non-linear behavior. Stabilization is typically accomplished by inserting impedance in series with the plasma load so the combination impedance has a voltage division that is characterized by the intersection of the linear series impedance and the instantaneous voltage-current. This is stable as long as there is an ample excess of voltage driving the plasma/series impedance complex. However providing series impedance that insures stable operation over varying power levels, lamp types/chemistries and changes resulting from aging can lead to inefficient operation as a result of either high voltage/power drops in the series impedance or a high source voltage driving smaller impedance. A method to optimize the series impedance and driving voltage through a dynamic adjustment process of both the voltage and impedance parameters to provide stable gas plasma drive and maximize system efficiency is described.
1. A method to control and regulate a power supply attached to a non-linear plasma load comprising the steps of:
utilizing a multi-parametric load line intercept control of a series source impedance;
sequencing of a voltage and a frequency control;
allowing a highly dynamic gas plasma load curve to be tracked through a load dynamic without a loss of conduction or plasma stability;
shaping of an initial current, as a load is energized during a conduction cycle, wherein a means of feedback is provided as to the appropriateness and quality of the adjustment.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
regulating the frequency and the voltage to move a load line intercept with a thermally variable voltage/current characteristic of a plasma of the non-linear plasma load.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
controlling the frequency and the voltage at a plurality of different points/conditions of the plasma.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
identifying art initial rise of a current to indicate plasma stability.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
comparing a predetermined absolute value related to the current to an ideal value.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
continuously determining separate comparative values related to the current over a period of time; and
comparing each subsequent comparative to a preceding comparative value to determine an operating condition of the non-linear plasma load.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
utilizing both a resonant and a non-resonate power stage design.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:
identifying a zero cross-point gating signal for a conduction current ramp up area capture.
9. A method to control and regulate a power supply attached to a non-linear plasma load comprising the steps of:
sampling an initial current rise signal over a predetermined time period in the non-linear plasma load upon an initial powering of the non-linear plasma load;
converting the initial current rise signal from an analog signal to a digital signal;
integrating the digital signal over the predetermined time period to arrive at comparison value;
comparing, the comparison value, against a known ideal condition; and
increasing a voltage supplied to the non-linear plasma load if the comparison value is lower than the known ideal condition to continue a powering of the non-linear plasma load.
10. The method of claim 9 further comprising the step of:
sampling a current signal over a plurality of separate predetermined time periods of identical duration wherein a plurality of current signal samples are acquired at discreet points in time.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: converting each current signal sample from an analog signal to a digital signal.
12. The method claim 11 further comprising the step of:
integrating each digital signal over the predetermined time period to arrive at a plurality of successive comparison values.
13. The method of claim 12 further comprising the step of:
comparing each subsequent value of the plurality of successive comparison values to a preceding value of the plurality of successive comparison values.
14. The method of claim 13 further comprising the step of:
comparing, each subsequent value of the plurality of successive comparison values to a preceding value of the plurality of successive comparison values.
15. the method of claim 14 further comprising the step of:
determining an operating condition of the non-linear plasma load based on a result of the comparing each subsequent value of the plurality of successive comparison values to a preceding value of the plurality of successive comparison values step.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of:
determining an impending end-of-life operating condition of the non-linear plasma load by comparing the successive comparison values to a known operating control range of a ballast.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of:
generating an end-of-life flag in response to an end-of-life condition as determined by the comparison of the successive comparison values the known operating control range of the ballast.
18. The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of:
automatically locking out the ballast in response to the end-of-life flag.