IP Library Granted Patent US 8,765,368
Granted Patent B2
US 8,765,368 · App. 12/212,003 · Granted Jul 1, 2014

Cancer risk biomarker

Inventors: James C. Willey (Toledo, OH); Thomas M. Blomquist (Perrysburg, OH); Erin L. Crawford (Rossford, OH); D'Anna N. Mullins (Maumee, OH)
Assignee: The University of Toledo
G01N33/574C12Q2545/114C12Q2600/157C12Q1/6886C12Q2600/16G01N2800/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,765,368
App. No.
12/212,003
Granted
Jul 1, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to methods and compositions for identifying biomarkers that indicate a biological state, in particular cancer or predisposition to cancer. Also provided are methods and compositions for identifying a greater risk for a cancer-related condition in an subject.

Claims (79)

1. A method of identifying a greater risk for developing bronchogenic carcinoma in a human subject comprising:

(a) assaying a bronchial epithelial cell sample from the subject;

(b) determining transcript abundance (TA) for a group of genes in the sample; wherein TA levels are determined by microarray analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, or a combination of both for 7 or more genes selected from the group of genes consisting of: CEBPG, E2F1, E2F6, XRCC1, ERCC4, ERCC5, GPX1, GPX3, GSTM3, GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTZ1, MGST1, SOD1 and CAT;

(c) comparing the TAs of step (b) to threshold levels for each gene, wherein the threshold levels comprise (molecules/10 6 β-actin):

CEBPG

≦3.1

E2F1

≦2.8

E2F6

2.2-2.5

XRCC1

≦4.3

ERCC4

≦2.8

ERCC5

≦4.6 or ≧5.1

GPX1

≦5.6 or ≧5.8

GPX3

≦3.4 or ≧3.7

GSTM3

≦3.0 or ≧3.6

GSTP1

≦6.4

GSTT1

≦3.8

GSTZ1

≦3.3

MGST1

≦3.4

SOD1

≦5.5 or ≧5.8

CAT

≦4.5; and,

(d) determining the subject as either having, or being at risk for developing, bronchogenic carcinoma when the TA levels of seven or more TAs in the test sample meet the threshold levels of step (c).

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step (b) of determining transcript abundance includes assaying transcript abundance by:

i) measuring a nucleic acid corresponding to each gene of the 7 or more genes selected from the group of genes relative to its competitive template;

ii) co-measuring a nucleic acid corresponding to a housekeeping gene with its competitive template; and

iii) obtaining a relation comparing values obtained from the co-measurements obtained from steps i) and ii).

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the nucleic acid for each gene refers to an mRNA transcript of the gene or a cDNA obtained from the mRNA.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the relation obtained can be a comparison of values for each gene, its competitive template, the housekeeping gene, and its competitive template.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein each gene is measured relative to a reference nucleic acid.

6. A method for selecting a therapy for a subject having a greater risk for developing bronchogenic carcinoma, comprising:

(a) assaying a bronchial epithelial cell sample from the subject;

(b) determining transcript abundance (TA) levels for a group of genes in the sample, wherein TA levels are determined by microarray analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, or a combination of both for 7 or more genes selected from the group of genes consisting of: CEBPG, E2F1, E2F6, XRCC1, ERCC4, ERCC5, GPX1, GPX3, GSTM3, GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTZ1, MGST1, SOD1 and CAT;

(c) comparing the TA levels of step (b) to threshold levels for each gene, wherein the threshold levels comprise (molecules/10 6 β-actin):

CEBPG

≦3.1

E2F1

≦2.8

E2F6

2.2-2.5

XRCC1

≦4.3

ERCC4

≦2.8

ERCC5

≦4.6 or ≧5.1

GPX1

≦5.6 or ≧5.8

GPX3

≦3.4 or ≧3.7

GSTM3

≦3.0 or ≧3.6

GSTP1

≦6.4

GSTT1

≦3.8

GSTZ1

≦3.3

MGST1

≦3.4

SOD1

≦5.5 or ≧5.8

CAT

≦4.5;

(d) calculating a combined score from the TA levels determined in step (b) and the comparisons made in step (c), wherein the combined score is calculated by assigning a value of 1 to each gene of step (b) whose TA level meets the threshold levels of step (c) or a value of 0 to each gene of step (b) whose TA level does not meet the threshold levels of step (c), and totaling assigned values for all genes;

(e) classifying the subject into a high or low risk group based on the combined score, wherein a combined score of 7 or more indicates a high risk; and,

(f) selecting therapy if the subject is in the high risk group.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 7, 2011
From: UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 026399/0429 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2008
From: WILLEY, JAMES C.; BLOMQUIST, THOMAS M.; CRAWFORD, ERIN L.; MULLINS, D'ANNA N.
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
Reel/Frame 021982/0394 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60972984 · Sep 17, 2007
Related Publication 20090181383A1 · Jul 16, 2009