IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,874,306
Granted Patent B2
US 8,874,306 · App. 13/440,374 · Granted Oct 28, 2014

Fast detection of error conditions in vehicle vacuum sensors for a hydraulic boost compensation system

Inventors: Willy Klier (Bloomfield Hills, MI); Kenta Mineo (Novi, MI); Scott Amenson (Dublin, OH)
Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
B60T17/22B60T2270/406B60T8/885
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,874,306
App. No.
13/440,374
Granted
Oct 28, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods of monitoring redundant vacuum sensors in the same vacuum chamber of a braking system to determine when an error condition is present in a braking system. The braking system includes a first sensor positioned in a chamber of the braking system and a second sensor positioned in the same chamber. A first reading is received from the first sensor and a second reading is received from the second sensor. A difference between the first reading and the second reading is determined. An error condition is indicated when the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a threshold.

Claims (64)

1. A method of determining when an error condition is present in a braking system, the braking system including a first sensor positioned in a chamber of the braking system and a second sensor positioned in the same chamber of the braking system, the method comprising:

receiving a first reading from the first sensor in the chamber of the braking system;

receiving a second reading from the second sensor in the chamber of the braking system;

determining a difference between the first reading and the second reading; and

indicating that an error condition is detected when the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the act of indicating that an error condition is detected further includes indicating that an error condition is detected only when the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains greater than the threshold for a defined period of time.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading; and

indicating that a second error condition is detected when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a gradient threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading;

determining when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a gradient threshold; and

indicating that an error condition is detected when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains above the gradient threshold for a defined period of time.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating an integral of the difference between the first reading and the second reading over time; and

indicating that an error condition is detected when the integral of the difference exceeds an integral threshold.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a threshold difference between the threshold and the difference between the first reading and the second reading;

adding the threshold difference to a sum of previous threshold differences;

indicating that an error condition is detected when the sum of previous threshold differences exceeds a sum difference threshold; and

resetting the sum of previous threshold differences to zero when the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains below a second difference threshold for a defined period of time.

7. A hydraulic boost compensation system comprising:

a vacuum chamber of a braking system;

a first vacuum sensor positioned in the vacuum chamber;

a second vacuum sensor positioned in the vacuum chamber;

a controller configured to

receive a first reading from the first sensor in the vacuum chamber of the braking system;

receive a second reading from the second sensor in the vacuum chamber of the braking system;

determine a difference between the first reading and the second reading; and

indicate that an error condition is detected when the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a threshold.

8. The hydraulic boost compensation system method of claim 7 , wherein the controller is configured to indicate that an error condition is detected by indicating that an error condition is detected only when the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains greater than the threshold for a defined period of time.

9. The hydraulic boost compensation system method of claim 7 , wherein the controller is further configured to

calculate a rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading; and

indicate that an error condition is detected when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a gradient threshold.

10. The hydraulic boost compensation system method of claim 7 , wherein the controller is further configured to

calculate a rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading;

determine when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading is greater than a gradient threshold; and

indicate that an error condition is detected when the rate of change of the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains above the gradient threshold for a defined period of time.

11. The hydraulic boost compensation system method of claim 7 , wherein the controller is further configured to

calculate an integral of the difference between the first reading and the second reading over time; and

indicating that an error condition is detected when the integral of the difference exceeds an integral threshold.

12. The hydraulic boost compensation system method of claim 7 , wherein the controller is further configured to

determine a threshold difference between the threshold and the difference between the first reading and the second reading;

add the threshold difference to a sum of previous threshold differences;

indicate that an error condition is detected with the sum of previous threshold differences exceeds a sum difference threshold; and

reset the sum of previous threshold differences to zero when the difference between the first reading and the second reading remains below a second difference threshold for a defined period of time.

13. A controller for a braking system, the braking system including a vacuum chamber, a first vacuum sensor positioned in the vacuum chamber, and a second vacuum sensor positioned in the vacuum chamber, the controller including a processor and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the controller to:

receive a first reading from the first vacuum sensor;

receive a second reading from the second vacuum sensor;

calculate a sensor reading difference, the sensor reading difference being the difference between the first reading and the second reading;

calculate a rate of change of the sensor reading difference over time;

indicate that a first error condition is detected when the rate of change of the sensor reading difference remains above a gradient threshold for a first defined period of time;

compare the sensor reading difference to a first difference threshold;

indicate that a second error condition is detected when the sensor reading difference remains above the first difference threshold a second defined period of time;

add the difference between the sensor reading difference and the first difference threshold to a sum of previous threshold differences;

indicating that a third error condition is detected when the sum of previous differences exceeds a sum difference threshold; and

resetting the sum of previous threshold differences when the sensor reading difference remains below a second difference threshold for a third defined period of time.

14. The controller of claim 13 , wherein the first difference threshold is equal to the second difference threshold.

15. The controller of claim 13 , wherein the first defined time period is equal to the second defined time period and the third defined time period.

16. The controller of claim 13 , wherein the first sensor and the second sensor are redundant, and wherein the first, second and third error conditions are for the first and second sensors positioned in the vacuum chamber.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the error condition is for the first and second sensors positioned in the same chamber, the chamber comprising a vacuum chamber.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first sensor and the second sensor are redundant.

19. The system of claim 7 , wherein the error condition is for the first and second sensors positioned in the vacuum chamber.

20. The system of claim 7 , wherein the first vacuum sensor and the second vacuum sensor are redundant.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2012
From: KLIER, WILLY; MINEO, KENTA; AMENSON, SCOTT
To: ROBERT BOSCH LLC; ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Reel/Frame 028015/0167 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61471787 · Apr 5, 2011
Related Publication 20120259506A1 · Oct 11, 2012