IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,240,121
Granted Patent B2
US 9,240,121 · App. 14/477,966 · Granted Jan 19, 2016

Determining alert criteria in a network environment

Inventors: Biswadeep Banerjee (Bangalore, IN); Mikael Lindstrom (Stockholm, SE); Shahbaz A. Shaik (Hyderabad, IN)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G08B29/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,240,121
App. No.
14/477,966
Granted
Jan 19, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Alert conditions datasets are created from historic data taken from actual incidents for which the alert condition datasets are to indicate during future operations. A networked computers system including various devices is monitored for alert conditions associated with one, or more, of the devices. The severity of an alert is based on the number of alert conditions met for a given alert conditions dataset.

Claims (17)

1. A method comprising:

collecting a set of baseline conditions for at least one system component during operation of a computer system when no existence of alert conditions are identified;

determining a time range for a first instance of an incident in the computer system;

collecting a set of collected conditions of at least one component of the computer system; and

deriving a set of alert conditions for the incident from the set of collected conditions;

wherein:

existence of the incident inhibits functionality of the at least one component of the computer system;

the set of collected conditions were present during the time range; and

at least the collecting and deriving steps are performed by computer software running on computer hardware.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

monitoring the at least one component of the computer system for the existence of an alert condition included in the set of alert conditions; and

responsive to identifying existence of the alert condition in the at least one component of the computer system, generating an alert of a second instance of the incident.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the alert indicates a percentage of alert conditions included in the set of alert conditions that are identified as existing in the at least one component of the computer system.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of deriving the set of alert conditions for the incident from the collected conditions further includes:

comparing the set of collected conditions to the set of baseline conditions.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of deriving the set of alert conditions for the incident from the set of collected conditions further includes:

selecting from the set of collected conditions the set of alert conditions based, at least in part, on a pre-determined variance between a value of a condition in the set of collected conditions and a corresponding value of a condition in the set of baseline conditions.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2014
From: BANERJEE, BISWADEEP; LINDSTROM, MIKAEL; SHAIK, SHAHBAZ A.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 033674/0251 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14270499 · May 6, 2014
Related Publication 20150325105A1 · Nov 12, 2015