IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,407,776
Granted Patent B2
US 9,407,776 · App. 14/458,623 · Granted Aug 2, 2016

Method for evaluation of printing and imaging systems that grade attributes of an image evaluation document produced by such systems

Inventors: Peter Aidan Crean (Webster, NY); Peter Harrold Dundas (Pittsford, NY); Henry Bernard Freedman (Burke, VA)
Assignee: TECHNOLOGY WATCH, LLC
H04N1/00015G06K9/036G06K9/4652G06T7/0004H04N1/0005H04N1/00005H04N1/00034H04N1/00047H04N1/00068H04N1/00079G06T2207/30144
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,407,776
App. No.
14/458,623
Granted
Aug 2, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and associated methods are provided for the evaluation of printing systems. Results may be expressed as a set of simple-to-understand alphabetic grades (e.g., A, B, C, D, F). These grades reflect the visual acceptability of prints of the image evaluation document produced by the printing system. Capabilities are provided for query and reporting of data across printing systems and over time for various attributes and factors.

Claims (73)

1. A method of evaluating a printing system comprising:

receiving a printed image evaluation document produced by the printing system;

measuring attributes of first test patterns of the printed image evaluation document using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer;

performing visual assessment of attributes of second test patterns of the printed image evaluation document;

assigning first attribute grades to the attributes associated with the measured attributes;

assigning second attribute grades to the attributes associated with the visual assessment;

grouping the first attribute grades and the second attribute grades into categories;

computing a grade for each category based upon the first attribute grades and second attribute grades grouped in that category; and

computing an overall grade based upon the category grades.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the attributes of first test patterns and the attributes of second test patterns comprise at least three of: facial reproduction, neutral reproduction, memory color reproduction, streaking and banding, mottle, resolution, line edge noise, text rendition, line width reproduction, color registration, and adjacency defects.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the categories comprise categories associated with attributes associated with color, solids, and lines & text.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a report with the attribute, category, and overall grades; and

transmitting the report.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating an electronic image evaluation document; and

transmitting the electronic image evaluation document to a printing facility at which the printing system resides.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image evaluation document comprises at least two of:

a three-color grayscale step chart;

a single-color grayscale step chart;

a four-color grayscale step chart;

at least one of a single-color cyan, magenta, or yellow step chart;

a pictorial comprising an image of a human face;

a pictorial comprising objects with memory colors;

an array of color patches;

lines at right angles;

horizontal lines of varying width;

vertical lines of varying width;

text on color backgrounds;

lines of different colors abutted end-to-end; and

concentric circles.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the color patches comprise color patches related to input values spaced approximately uniformly through the input color space.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the image evaluation document comprises:

a set of substantially identical pages; and

a set of unique pages.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein each page in the sequence of substantially identical pages differs in identifying information.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the image evaluation document is generated based upon information related to the capabilities of a target imaging device.

11. A method of evaluating imaging devices comprising:

evaluating, using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer, attributes of a first copy of an image evaluation document printed using a first instance of a type of imaging device to produce a first set of grades;

evaluating, using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer, attributes of a second copy of an image evaluation document printed using a second instance of a type of imaging device to produce a second set of grades;

comparing the first and second grades to one or more predetermined grade-difference thresholds;

responsive to a determination that a difference between the first set of grades and the second set of grades exceeds a threshold, determining a difference in at least one of maintenance, materials, or operating procedure between the printing of the image evaluation document on the first instance of a type of imaging device and the second instance of a type of imaging device;

resolving the determined difference in at least one of maintenance, materials, or operating procedure; and

evaluating, using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer, attributes of a third copy of an image evaluation document printed on the first instance of a type of imaging device to produce a third set of grades.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein evaluating a copy of an image evaluation document comprises:

receiving a printed image evaluation document;

measuring attributes of first test patterns of the printed image evaluation document;

performing visual assessment of attributes of second test patterns of the printed image evaluation document;

assigning first attribute grades to the attributes associated with the measured attributes;

assigning second attribute grades to the attributes associated with the visual assessment;

grouping the first attribute grades and the second attribute grades into categories;

computing a grade for each category based upon the first attribute grades and second attribute grades grouped in that category; and

computing an overall grade based upon the category grades.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the first grades and the second grades comprise grades for at least three of: facial reproduction, neutral reproduction, memory color reproduction, streaking and banding, mottle, resolution, line edge noise, text rendition, line width reproduction, color registration, and adjacency defects.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the grades are combined into categories associated with color, solids, and lines & text.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein evaluating the printed image evaluation document:

further uses visual scoring.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the visual scoring comprises:

comparing a portion of the printed image evaluation document to a set of reference samples corresponding to the portion of the printed image evaluation document.

17. A method of evaluating imaging devices comprising:

evaluating, using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer, attributes of a plurality of copies of an image evaluation document printed using a plurality of first imaging devices to produce a plurality of first sets of grades;

evaluating, using at least one of a colorimeter, a spectrophotometer, and a densitomer, attributes of a copy of an image evaluation document printed using a second imaging device to produce a second set of grades; and

generating a report comprising a plurality of histograms representing the distribution of grades for each of a plurality of attributes of the plurality of first sets of grades, wherein each of said histograms is marked with an indication of the corresponding attribute grade from the second set of grades.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the first sets of grades and the second set of grades comprise grades for at least three of: facial reproduction, neutral reproduction, memory color reproduction, streaking and banding, mottle, resolution, line edge noise, text rendition, line width reproduction, color registration, and adjacency defects.

19. The method of claim 17 wherein evaluating a copy of an image evaluation document comprises:

receiving a printed image evaluation document;

measuring attributes of first test patterns of the printed image evaluation document;

performing visual assessment of attributes of second test patterns of the printed image evaluation document;

assigning first attribute grades to the attributes associated with the measured attributes;

assigning second attribute grades to the attributes associated with the visual assessment;

grouping the first attribute grades and the second attribute grades into categories;

computing a grade for each category based upon the first attribute grades and second attribute grades grouped in that category; and

computing an overall grade based upon the category grades.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2014
From: CREAN, PETER AIDAN; DUNDAS, PETER HARROLD; FREEDMAN, HENRY BERNARD
To: TECHNOLOGY WATCH, LLC
Reel/Frame 033665/0745 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61865363 · Aug 13, 2013
Related Publication 20150049921A1 · Feb 19, 2015