IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,483,342
Granted Patent B2
US 9,483,342 · App. 14/256,673 · Granted Nov 1, 2016

Supporting failure mode and effects analysis

Inventor: Kai Höfig (München, DE)
Assignee: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
G06F11/079G06Q10/04G06Q10/101
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,483,342
App. No.
14/256,673
Granted
Nov 1, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for supporting failure mode and effects analysis includes storing a meta-model in a computer-readable storage medium. The meta-model includes generic parts of technical systems, generic failure modes, and associations between the generic parts and the generic failure modes. The associations indicate, for each generic part, one or more generic failure modes associated with the generic part. Each generic failure mode identifies a type of failure for a respective generic part. A processor instantiates the generic parts and the generic failure modes to generate part instances and failure mode instances specifying a technical system. The part instances and the failure mode instances are stored, such as in the computer-readable storage medium.

Claims (70)

1. A method for supporting failure mode and effects analysis, the method comprising:

storing a meta-model in a computer-readable storage medium, the meta-model comprising generic parts of a plurality of technical systems, generic failure modes, and associations between the generic parts and the generic failure modes, the associations indicating, for each generic part, one or more generic failure modes associated with the generic part, wherein each generic failure mode identifies a type of failure for a respective generic part;

instantiating, with a processor, the generic parts and the generic failure modes to generate part instances and failure mode instances, respectively, the part instances and the failure mode instances specifying an individual technical system of the plurality of technical systems;

storing the part instances and the failure mode instances in association with the plurality of technical systems; and

associating each failure mode instance with a respective one of the part instances based on the associations between the generic failure modes and the generic parts stored in the meta-model, wherein at least one of the part instances is associated with more than one failure mode instance.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein instantiating the generic parts and the generic failure modes comprises: constructing the part instances and the failure mode instances as objects from classes representing the generic parts and the generic failure modes; or

generating the part instances and the failure mode instances as database entries from database content specifying the generic parts and the generic failure modes.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

quantifying a failure behavior for each part instance; and

storing a percentage in each failure mode instance, the percentage indicating a portion of the quantified failure behavior of the part instance associated with the failure mode instance that corresponds to the failure mode instance.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

adding to the meta-model a new generic failure mode and an association of the new generic failure mode to a corresponding generic part; and

automatically instantiating, with the processor, the new generic failure mode to generate new failure mode instances and associations to all part instances previously instantiated from the corresponding generic part.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating effect elements and associating each effect element with one or more failure mode instances of the individual technical system, wherein each effect element includes storing information about an effect of the associated failure mode instances on the individual technical system in each effect element.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

storing in each effect element a safety categorization of the effect element.

7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

logging events during operation of the individual technical system;

storing recorded effects based on the logged events;

associating each recorded effect with an effect element; and

monitoring, based on the frequency of the recorded effects, failure rates of the part instances, the failure mode instances, or both the part instances and the failure mode instances, associated with the effect element.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

tracing recorded effects to the corresponding effect elements, the failure mode instances and the part instances; and

identifying the part instances that exceed a predetermined failure rate to repair or replace the identified part instances in order for the technical system to comply with failure rate limitations.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

incorporating measure elements corresponding to diagnostic measures in the meta-model, wherein each diagnostic measure is configured to detect occurrence of the failure mode instances and to prevent failure effects caused by the failure mode instances;

associating each measure element with the failure mode instances the occurrence of which is detected; and

storing an effectiveness in each measure element, the effectiveness specifying a probability that the associated failure mode instances are detectable by the corresponding diagnostic measure.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the generic parts are generic parts of electric vehicles, industrial plants, or both electric vehicles and industrial plants; and

at least one technical system of the plurality of technical systems is an electric vehicle, an industrial plant, a subsystem of an electric vehicle, or a subsystem of an industrial plant.

11. A system for supporting failure mode and effects analysis, the system comprising:

a digital data storage medium configured to store a meta-model, the meta-model comprising generic parts of a plurality of technical systems, generic failure modes, and associations between the generic parts and the generic failure modes, the associations indicating, for each generic part, one or more generic failure modes associated with the generic part, wherein each generic failure mode identifies a type of failure for a respective generic part; and

a processor configured to:

instantiate the generic parts and the generic failure modes to generate part instances and failure mode instances specifying an individual technical system of the plurality of technical systems;

store the part instances and the failure mode instances in association with the plurality of technical systems; and

associate each failure mode instance with a respective one of the part instances based on the associations between the generic failure modes and the generic parts stored in the meta-model, wherein at least one of the part instances is associated with more than one failure mode instance.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to instantiate the generic parts and the generic failure modes by:

constructing the part instances and the failure mode instances as objects from classes representing the generic parts and the generic failure modes; or

generating the part instances and the failure mode instances as database entries from database content specifying the generic parts and the generic failure modes.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

quantify a failure behavior for each part instance; and

store a percentage in each failure mode instance, the percentage indicating a portion of the quantified failure behavior of the part instance associated with the failure mode instance that corresponds to the failure mode instance.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

add to the meta-model a new generic failure mode and an association of the new generic failure mode to a corresponding generic part; and

automatically instantiate the new generic failure mode to generate new failure mode instances and associations to all part instances previously instantiated from the corresponding generic part.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

generate effect elements and associating each effect element with one or more failure mode instances of the individual technical system, wherein each effect element includes information about the effect of the associated failure mode instances on the individual technical system.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

store in each effect element a safety categorization of the effect element.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

log events during operation of the individual technical system;

store recorded effects based on the logged events; associate each recorded effect with an effect element; and

monitor, based on the frequency of the recorded effects, failure rates of the part instances, the failure mode instances, or both the part instances and the failure mode instances, that are associated with the effect element.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

trace recorded effects to the corresponding effect elements, the failure mode instances and the part instances; and

identify the part instances that exceed an predetermined failure rate to repair or replace the identified part instances in order for the technical system to comply with failure rate limitations.

19. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

incorporate measure elements corresponding to diagnostic measures in the meta-model, wherein each diagnostic measure is configured to detect occurrence of the failure mode instances and to prevent failure effects caused by the respective failure mode instances, associate each measure element with the failure mode instances the occurrence of which is detected; and

store an effectiveness in each measure element, the effectiveness specifying a probability that the associated failure mode instances are detectable by the corresponding diagnostic measure.

20. The system of claim 11 , wherein:

the generic parts are generic parts of electric vehicles, industrial plants, or both electric vehicles and industrial plants; and

at least one technical system of the plurality of technical systems is an electric vehicle, an industrial plant, a subsystem of an electric vehicle, or a subsystem of an industrial plant.

21. A computer program product including one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media having stored thereon:

a meta-model, the meta-model comprising generic parts of a plurality of technical systems, generic failure modes, and associations between the generic parts and the generic failure modes, the associations indicating, for each generic part, one or more generic failure modes associated with the generic part, wherein each generic failure mode identifies a type of failure for a respective a generic part; and

instructions executable by one or more processors of a computing system, wherein execution of the instructions causes the computer system to perform operations for supporting failure mode and effects analysis, the instructions comprising:

instantiating the generic parts and the generic failure modes to generate part instances and failure mode instances, respectively, the part instances and the failure mode instances specifying an individual technical system of the plurality of technical system;

storing the part instances and the failure mode instances in association with the plurality of technical systems; and

associate each failure mode instance with a respective one of the part instances based on the associations between the generic failure modes and the generic parts stored in the meta-model, wherein at least one of the part instances is associated with more than one failure mode instance.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2014
From: HOFIG, KAI
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 033472/0577 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 14160897 · Mar 20, 2014 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150269013A1 · Sep 24, 2015