IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,509,176
Granted Patent B2
US 9,509,176 · App. 13/838,014 · Granted Nov 29, 2016

Energy storage modeling and control

Inventors: W. Craig Carter (Jamaica Plain, MA); Marco Ferrara (Boston, MA); Michael Goroff (Brookline, MA); Maxwell Mann (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: IHI INC.
H02J15/00G05B13/041G05F1/67G06Q10/06H02J3/00Y02E40/76Y04S10/545
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,509,176
App. No.
13/838,014
Filed
Mar 15, 2013
Granted
Nov 29, 2016
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2126
USPC
700/291
Abstract

Systems and methods for optimal planning and real-time control of energy storage systems for multiple simultaneous applications are provided. Energy storage applications can be analyzed for relevant metrics such as profitability and impact on the functionality of the electric grid, subject to system-wide and energy storage hardware constraints. The optimal amount of storage capacity and the optimal operating strategy can then be derived for each application and be prioritized according to a dispatch stack, which can be statically or dynamically updated according to data forecasts. Embodiments can consist of both planning tools and real-time control algorithms.

Claims (63)

1. A computerized method for controlling balancing services based on a combination of an energy storage system and reserves using a computer, the method comprising:

receiving at the computer a first physical model relating to a rate of degradation of the energy storage system;

retrieving from a first database, using the computer, first historical data relating to historical renewable energy generation;

retrieving from a second database, using the computer, second historical data relating to historical forecast error;

receiving at the computer one or more possible configurations for the energy storage system;

receiving at the computer a cost model for the energy storage system;

receiving at the computer information relating to a cost of providing the reserves;

receiving at the computer one or more possible operating strategies of the energy storage system for minimizing a cost of the balancing services,

wherein the one or more possible operating strategies are computed via

calculating, using the computer, a renewable energy power supply commitment based on forecasted renewable energy generation and user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements; and

calculating, using the computer, a difference between the calculated renewable energy power supply commitments and real-time renewable energy generation,

wherein the renewable energy power supply commitment comprises a plurality of power block commitments, each of the power block commitments being characterized by a duration, a slope, and a jump from an adjacent power block commitment, and

the user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements comprise a maximum allowed slope and a maximum allowed jump from an adjacent power block commitment for the power block commitments;

receiving at the computer a second physical model relating to forecast uncertainty;

calculating, using the computer, an optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves that minimizes a cost of balancing the difference based on the first historical data, the second historical data, the first and second physical models, the information relating to a cost of providing the reserves, the one or more possible energy storage system configurations, the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies, and the cost model; and

charging or discharging, using a controller, an energy storage asset of the energy storage system in accordance with the calculated optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves.

2. The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the renewable energy generation comprises wind power generation.

3. The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more possible energy storage system configurations comprise at least one of capacity information, power rating information, charge rate information, discharge rate information, efficiency loss information, and useful life information.

4. The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the step of calculating the optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves comprises using at least one of a list comparison, a multivariate regression technique, a local optimization technique, linear programming, non-linear programming, a Monte Carlo optimization, a machine learning technique, a regression fitting technique, and a multivariate optimization technique.

5. The computerized method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating, using the computer, at least one of an optimal energy storage system capacity, an optimal energy storage system operating strategy, and a financial metric for the energy storage system based on simulation of the one or more possible energy storage system configurations and the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies.

6. A system for controlling balancing services based on a combination of an energy storage system and reserves, the system comprising:

a first database;

a second database;

a computer configured to:

receive a first physical model relating to a rate of degradation of the energy storage system;

retrieve from the first database first historical data relating to historical renewable energy generation;

retrieve from the second database second historical data relating to historical forecast error;

receive one or more possible configurations for the energy storage system;

receive a cost model for the energy storage system;

receive information relating to a cost of providing the reserves;

receive one or more possible operating strategies of the energy storage system for minimizing a cost of the balancing services,

wherein the one or more possible operating strategies are computed via

calculating a renewable energy power supply commitment based on forecasted renewable energy generation and user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements; and

calculating a difference between the calculated renewable energy power supply commitments and real-time renewable energy generation,

wherein the renewable energy power supply commitment comprises a plurality of power block commitments, each of the power block commitments being characterized by a duration, a slope, and a jump from an adjacent power block commitment, and

the user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements comprise a maximum allowed slope and a maximum allowed jump from an adjacent power block commitment for the power block commitments;

receive a second physical model relating to forecast uncertainty; and

calculate an optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves that minimizes a cost of balancing the difference based on the first historical data, the second historical data, the first and second physical models, the information relating to a cost of providing the reserves, the one or more possible energy storage system configurations, the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies, and the cost model; and

a controller configured to charge or discharge an energy storage asset of the energy storage system in accordance with the calculated optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the renewable energy generation comprises wind power generation.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more possible energy storage system configurations comprise at least one of capacity information, power rating information, charge rate information, discharge rate information, efficiency loss information, and useful life information.

9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the computer is further configured to calculate the optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves by using at least one of a list comparison, a multivariate regression technique, a local optimization technique, linear programming, non-linear programming, a Monte Carlo optimization, a machine learning technique, a regression fitting technique, and a multivariate optimization technique.

10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the computer is further configured to calculate at least one of an optimal energy storage system capacity, an optimal energy storage system operating strategy, and a financial metric for the energy storage system based on simulation of the one or more energy storage system configurations and the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies.

11. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon executable code which causes a computer to perform a method for controlling balancing services based on a combination of an energy storage system and reserves, the method comprising:

receiving at the computer a first physical model relating to a rate of degradation of the energy storage system;

retrieving from a first database, using the computer, first historical data relating to historical renewable energy generation;

retrieving from a second database, using the computer, second historical data relating to historical forecast error;

receiving at the computer one or more configurations for the energy storage system;

receiving at the computer a cost model for the energy storage system;

receiving at the computer information relating to a cost of providing the reserves;

receiving at the computer one or more possible operating strategies of the energy storage system for minimizing a cost of the balancing services,

wherein the one or more possible operating strategies are computed via

calculating, using the computer, a renewable energy power supply commitment based on forecasted renewable energy generation and user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements; and

calculating, using the computer, a difference between the calculated renewable energy power supply commitments and real-time renewable energy generation;

wherein the renewable energy power supply commitment comprises a plurality of power block commitments, each of the power block commitments being characterized by a duration, a slope, and a jump from an adjacent power block commitment, and

the user defined renewable energy power shaping requirements comprise a maximum allowed slope and a maximum allowed jump from an adjacent power block commitment for the power block commitments;

receiving at the computer a second physical model relating to forecast uncertainty;

calculating, using the computer, an optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves that minimizes a cost of balancing the difference based on the first historical data, the second historical data, the first and second physical models, the information relating to a cost of providing the reserves, the one or more possible energy storage system configurations, the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies, and the cost model; and

charging or discharging, using a controller, an energy storage asset of the energy storage system in accordance with the calculated optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the renewable energy generation comprises wind power generation.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more possible energy storage system configurations comprise at least one of capacity information, power rating information, charge rate information, discharge rate information, efficiency loss information, and useful life information.

14. The computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the step of calculating the optimal combination of the energy storage system and the reserves comprises at least one of a list comparison, a multivariate regression technique, a local optimization technique, linear programming, non-linear programming, a Monte Carlo optimization, a machine learning technique, a regression fitting technique, and a multivariate optimization technique.

15. The computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the method further comprises calculating, using the computer, at least one of an optimal energy storage system capacity, an optimal energy storage system operating strategy, and a financial metric for the energy storage system based on simulation of the one or more possible energy storage system configurations and the one or more possible energy storage system operating strategies.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2020
From: IHI INC.
To: IHI TERRASUN SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 053260/0715 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2015
From: 24M TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: IHI INC.
Reel/Frame 036711/0821 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2013
From: CARTER, W. CRAIG; FERRARA, MARCO; GOROFF, MICHAEL; MANN, MAXWELL
To: 24M TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 031328/0473 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61620206 · Apr 4, 2012
Related Publication 20140039710A1 · Feb 6, 2014