IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,521,830
Granted Patent B2
US 9,521,830 · App. 14/829,403 · Granted Dec 20, 2016

Bird or bat detection and identification for wind turbine risk mitigation

Inventors: Eric S. Wenger (Lakewood, CO); Andrew G. Oliver (Longmont, CO); Victor L. Babbitt (Superior, CO)
Assignee: Identiflight, LLC
A01K29/005A01M29/00A01M29/10A01M29/16A01M31/002F03D7/00F03D7/048F03D9/002F03D80/00F03D80/10G06F3/005G06K9/6267G06T7/2093H04N7/181H04N13/0242H04N13/0296G06T2200/24G06T2207/30241H04N5/247Y02E10/726
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,521,830
App. No.
14/829,403
Granted
Dec 20, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automated system for mitigating risk from a wind turbine includes a plurality of optical imaging sensors. A controller receives and analyzes images from the optical imaging sensors to automatically send a signal to curtail operation of the wind turbine to a predetermined risk mitigating level when the controller determines from images received from the optical imaging sensors that an airborne animal is at risk from the wind turbine.

Claims (33)

1. An automated system for mitigating risk from a wind turbine, the automated system comprising:

a plurality of optical imaging sensors; and

a controller configured to receive and analyze images from the optical imaging sensors to send a first signal to curtail operation of the wind turbine to a predetermined risk mitigating level when the controller determines from images received from the optical imaging sensors that an airborne animal of a predetermined species is at risk from the wind turbine;

wherein the controller is further configured to send a second signal to resume normal operation of the wind turbine when the controller determines from additional images from the optical imaging sensors that there is a reduced level of risk from the wind turbine to the airborne animal; and

wherein the controller is further configured to determine whether the airborne animal is a member of the predetermined species before the airborne animal is closer to the wind turbine than a distance the predetermined species flies at a characteristic speed to the airborne animal in a time required to curtail operation of the wind turbine to the predetermined risk mitigating level.

2. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic speed of the predetermined species is an average horizontal flight speed of the predetermined species.

3. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic speed of the predetermined species is a maximum horizontal flight speed of the predetermined species.

4. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the controller determines the predetermined species before the airborne animal is closer than approximately 600 meters to the wind turbine.

5. The automated system of claim 4 , wherein the controller detects the airborne animal at a distance from the wind turbine greater than approximately 800 meters that where the controller subsequently determines the airborne animal is of the predetermined species.

6. The automated system of claim 4 , wherein the plurality of optical imaging sensors are arranged with overlapping fields of view and with a combined field of view that visually occupies about 360 degrees around the wind turbine.

7. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of optical imaging sensors are arranged with a combined field of view of about 360 degrees around the wind turbine.

8. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of optical imaging sensors are arranged with overlapping fields of view.

9. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein at least some of the optical imaging sensors are attached to a tower supporting the wind turbine.

10. The automated system of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the optical imaging sensors is arranged with a field of view directly above the wind turbine.

11. The automated system of claim 1 comprising a deterrent system, wherein the controller automatically sends a signal to the deterrent system to deploy a deterrent if the controller determines from images from the optical imaging sensors that the airborne animal of the predetermined species is approaching the wind turbine.

12. An automated system for mitigating risk from a wind turbine, the automated system comprising:

a plurality of optical imaging sensors;

a deterrent system; and

a controller configured to receive and analyze images from the optical imaging sensors and to send a signal to the deterrent system to deploy a deterrent if the controller determines from images received from the optical imaging sensors that an airborne animal of a predetermined species is approaching the wind turbine;

wherein the controller determines the predetermined species before the airborne animal is closer than approximately 600 meters to the wind turbine.

13. The automated system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of optical imaging sensors are arranged with overlapping fields of view and with a combined field of view of about 360 degrees or more around the wind turbine.

14. The automated system of claim 12 , wherein at least some of the optical imaging sensors are attached to a tower supporting the wind turbine.

15. An automated system for surveying the population of a predetermined species of interest, comprising:

a plurality of optical imaging sensors; and

a controller that receives and analyzes images from the optical imaging sensors and determines whether airborne animals detected with the optical imaging sensors are members of the predetermined species;

wherein the controller determines the predetermined species before the airborne animal is closer than approximately 600 meters to the imaging sensors.

16. An automated system for mitigating risk from a wind turbine, the automated system comprising:

a plurality of optical imaging sensors; and

a controller configured to receive and analyze images from the optical imaging sensors to send a first signal to curtail operation of the wind turbine to a predetermined risk mitigating level when the controller determines from images received from the optical imaging sensors that an airborne animal of a predetermined species is at risk from the wind turbine;

wherein the controller determines the predetermined species before the airborne animal is closer than approximately 600 meters to the wind turbine.

17. The automated system of claim 16 , wherein the controller detects the airborne animal at a distance from the wind turbine greater than approximately 800 meters, where the controller subsequently determines the airborne animal is of the predetermined species.

18. The automated system of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of optical imaging sensors are arranged with overlapping fields of view and with a combined field of view that visually occupies about 360 degrees around the wind turbine.

19. The automated system of claim 16 , wherein at least one of the optical imaging sensors is arranged with a field of view directly above the wind turbine.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2017
From: IDENTIFLIGHT, LLC
To: IDENTIFLIGHT INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 042301/0406 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 036459 FRAME: 0513. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 20, 2017
From: WENGER, ERIC S.; OLIVER, ANDREW G.; BABBITT, VICTOR L.
To: IDENTIFLIGHT, LLC
Reel/Frame 041804/0415 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2015
From: WENGER, ERIC S.; OLIVER, ANDREW G.; BABBITT, VICTOR L.
To: INDENTIFLIGHT, LLC
Reel/Frame 036459/0513 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62040081 · Aug 21, 2014
Related Publication 20160053744A1 · Feb 25, 2016