IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,573,246
Granted Patent B2
US 9,573,246 · App. 14/540,107 · Granted Feb 21, 2017

Method of pre-evaluating water jet peening, recording medium having program recorded thereon to execute the method, device for executing the method, and water jet peening method

Inventors: Takaharu Maeguchi (Tokyo, JP); Takahiro Ota (Tokyo, JP); Tomoshige Takata (Tokyo, JP); Hideki Madokoro (Tokyo, JP); Hiroshi Kanasaki (Tokyo, JP); Nobuyuki Hori (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
B24C1/10C21D7/06G06F17/5009G06F17/5018C21D11/00G06F2217/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,573,246
App. No.
14/540,107
Granted
Feb 21, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A condition setting process of determining peening conditions for water jet peening on a peening target object, an analysis process of analyzing a jet when a liquid is jetted from a nozzle model to a peening target object model and obtaining a void rate that is a volume rate of air bubbles contained in a unit volume of the liquid and a collapse rate that is a volume of the air bubbles collapsing in a unit time in the unit volume of the liquid in each position on a surface of the peening target object model, a shock pressure correlation value calculation process of obtaining a shock pressure correlation value that is a product of the void rate and the collapse rate in each position, and a range calculation process of obtaining an effective processing range in which the shock pressure correlation value on the surface of the peening target object model is greater than a predetermined value, based on the shock pressure correlation value in each position.

Claims (25)

1. A method of pre-evaluating water jet peening, comprising:

a condition setting process of determining peening conditions for water jet peening on a peening target object;

an analysis process of analyzing a jet when a liquid is jetted from a nozzle model to a peening target object model according to the peening conditions, and obtaining a void rate that is a volume rate of air bubbles contained in a unit volume of the liquid and a collapse rate that is a volume of the air bubbles collapsing in a unit time in the unit volume of the liquid, in a number of positions on a surface of the peening target object model;

a shock pressure correlation value calculation process of obtaining a shock pressure correlation value that is a product of the void rate and the collapse rate in each position on the surface of the peening target object model; and

a range calculation process of obtaining an effective processing range on the surface of the peening target object model indicating an effective water jet peening in which the shock pressure correlation value on the surface of the peening target object model is greater than a predetermined value, based on the shock pressure correlation value in each position on the surface of the peening target object model.

2. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined value is 0.

3. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 1 , further comprising:

a determination process of determining whether the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is an appropriate range in a relationship with a target processing range,

wherein, when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is not the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range, the peening conditions determined in the condition setting process are changed and then the shock pressure correlation value calculation process and the range calculation process are executed again.

4. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 2 , further comprising:

a determination process of determining whether the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is an appropriate range in a relationship with a target processing range,

wherein, when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is not the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range, the peening conditions determined in the condition setting process are changed and then the shock pressure correlation value calculation process and the range calculation process are executed again.

5. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 3 ,

wherein the condition setting process includes a nozzle model setting process of identifying a shape of the nozzle model, and

when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is not the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range, the shape of the nozzle model identified in the nozzle model setting process is changed and then the shock pressure correlation value calculation process and the range calculation process are executed again.

6. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 4 ,

wherein the condition setting process includes a nozzle model setting process of identifying a shape of the nozzle model, and

when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is not the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range, the shape of the nozzle model identified in the nozzle model setting process is changed and then the shock pressure correlation value calculation process and the range calculation process are executed again.

7. The method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 1 , further comprising an output process of outputting the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process.

8. A water jet peening method comprising:

executing the method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 3 ; and

executing water jet peening for the peening target object under the peening conditions determined in the condition setting process when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range.

9. A water jet peening method comprising:

executing the method of pre-evaluating water jet peening according to claim 4 ; and

executing water jet peening for the peening target object under the peening conditions determined in the condition setting process when it is determined in the determination process that the effective processing range obtained in the range calculation process is the appropriate range in the relationship with the target processing range.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2014
From: MAEGUCHI, TAKAHARU; OTA, TAKAHIRO; TAKATA, TOMOSHIGE; MADOKORO, HIDEKI; KANASAKI, HIROSHI; HORI, NOBUYUKI
To: MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Reel/Frame 034162/0949 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2013-247967 · Nov 29, 2013 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150151405A1 · Jun 4, 2015