IP Library Granted Patent US 9,689,946
Granted Patent B2
US 9,689,946 · App. 13/863,402 · Granted Jun 27, 2017

Method for magnetic resonance imaging with optimized background phase distribution

Inventors: Johannes Schneider (Karlsruhe, DE); Peter Ullmann (Karlsruhe, DE)
Assignee: Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH
G01R33/56G01R33/4833G01R33/5612G01R33/5611
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,689,946
App. No.
13/863,402
Granted
Jun 27, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for magnetic resonance (MR) for imaging an imaging area of an object has a reconstruction image quality which depends on a spatial distribution of background phase. A background phase distribution is initially determined using an optimization algorithm having a reconstruction quality as an optimization criterion, wherein limitation of a spatial variation of a background phase offset distribution is integrated as a boundary condition in the optimization algorithm. At least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse is applied which contributes to generation of an MR signal distribution having a previously determined background phase distribution, wherein the at least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse generates the background phase offset distribution as a part of the background phase distribution. In this fashion, the reconstruction quality is improved in a manner which can be realized using available equipment.

Claims (22)

1. A method for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for imaging an imaging area of an object, wherein a reconstruction image quality depends on a spatial distribution of background phase, the method comprising the steps of:

a) determining a background phase distribution using an optimization algorithm having a reconstruction quality as an optimization criterion, wherein limitation of a spatial variation of a background phase offset distribution is integrated as a boundary condition in the optimization algorithm;

b) applying at least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse, said at least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse contributing to generation of an MR signal distribution having a previously determined background phase distribution, wherein the at least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse generates the background phase offset distribution as a part of the background phase distribution;

c) acquiring MR signals;

d) reconstructing a spatial MR signal distribution; and

e) storing and/or displaying an MR image.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein conjugated k space symmetries are utilized for reconstruction.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein phase-limited image reconstruction is performed.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein k space is not completely sampled during acquisition of the MR signals.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein acquisition of the MR signals is performed by means of at least two receiving elements of a receiving antenna array.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein acquisition of the MR signals and reconstruction are performed in accordance with a SENSE method.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein acquisition of the MR signals and reconstruction are performed in accordance with a GRAPPA method.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a signal-to-noise ratio in a re-constructed image is used as a criterion for reconstruction quality.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein a geometry factor which specifies a spatially dependent noise increase caused by reconstruction within a scope of a parallel imaging method, is used as a criterion for reconstruction quality.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein a strength of artefacts in a re-constructed image is used as a criterion for reconstruction quality.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein within a scope of the optimization algorithm, at least two different background phase distributions are examined with respect to achieved reconstruction quality and a background phase distribution is selected which produces a best reconstruction quality.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least in an imaging area of the object, a spatial grid with grid points is defined and the optimization algorithm determines the background phase for each grid point individually in a search, and one measure to meet the boundary condition consists in that this search is performed only within a certain phase value range which depends on phase values at those grid points for which the search has already been performed.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein a measure for fulfilment of the boundary condition consists in that, in a first step of the optimization algorithm, a preliminary background phase offset distribution is determined and, in a second step, spatial jumps of the preliminary background phase offset distribution are eliminated by adding, to the preliminary background phase offset distribution, at least one further spatial phase distribution which substantially does not change reconstruction quality.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein limitation of the spatial variation of the background phase offset distribution is performed in dependence on a spatial resolution of the at least one spatially selective radio frequency pulse.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the spatially selective radio frequency pulses is a spatially selective radio frequency pulse based on an additional magnetic field.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein application of at least one of the spatially selective radio frequency pulses is performed by means of at least two transmitting elements of a transmitting antenna device.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimization algorithm determines a background phase distribution relative to an initial background phase distribution determined in a preliminary experiment or through calculation.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 67364 FRAME: 778. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 12, 2024
From: BRUKER BIOSPIN MRI GMBH
To: BRUKER BIOSPIN GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 067884/0303 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2024
From: BRUKER BIOSPIN MRI GMBH
To: BRUKER BIOSPIN GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 067364/0778 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2013
From: SCHNEIDER, JOHANNES; ULLMANN, PETER
To: BRUKER BIOSPIN MRI GMBH
Reel/Frame 030256/0307 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2012 206 493 · Apr 19, 2012 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130293230A1 · Nov 7, 2013