IP Library Granted Patent US 9,721,027
Granted Patent B2
US 9,721,027 · App. 15/229,606 · Granted Aug 1, 2017

Collection, monitoring, analyzing and reporting decay rate of traffic speed data via vehicle sensor devices placed at multiple remote locations

Inventors: Christopher S. Johnson (Port Matilda, PA); Jason S. Geiger (Boulder, CO); John T. Graef (State College, PA)
Assignee: Intuitive Control Systems, LLC
G06F17/30867G08G1/0112G08G1/0129G08G1/052H04L67/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,721,027
App. No.
15/229,606
Granted
Aug 1, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Apparatus and methods provide the effectiveness decay rate of actual police enforcement by allowing the user to chart the speeds in a particular location and overlay times when an officer was present and providing on-site enforcement. The system can monitor the speed in the location and when the speeds creep back up to a set speed or multiple of the speed after the enforcement period, the officer can be notified to provide enforcement again and reduce the speeds. For example, once the police car goes away, some locations may take longer for the average speed to creep back up to normal and others may have the average speed increase more quickly. A visual display of the situation provides a systematic method for determining enforcement locations and timing in place of conventional “seat-of-the-pants” enforcement planning.

Claims (51)

1. An apparatus for creating traffic enforcement charts that show the effects of police enforcement on vehicle speed data captured by a plurality of vehicle sensor devices, each device being at a different fixed location in a region, each device capturing vehicle speed data of a plurality of vehicles that pass the device, the vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed, the apparatus comprising:

(a) a central computer database that is located remotely from the vehicles and which receives and stores:

(i) the captured average vehicle speed data from the different fixed locations, and

(ii) an indication of whether police enforcement that is visually noticeable to vehicles is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals; and

(b) a server in communication with the central computer database, the server:

(i) receiving the captured vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed from the different fixed locations for a plurality of time intervals within a time period,

(ii) receiving an indication of whether the police enforcement is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals, and

(iii) creating a traffic enforcement chart for one of the fixed locations from the captured vehicle speed data and the police enforcement indications, the traffic enforcement chart including:

(A) a trend line of the average vehicle speed, and

(B) a visual indicator of the time intervals when the police enforcement was present,

wherein the trend line visually communicates changes in average vehicle speed when the police enforcement is present and is not present.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 further including an alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off, the server calculating when the residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off by comparing average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present with average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is present.

3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that residual enforcement has dropped by a predefined percentage effective amount.

4. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that the average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present has risen by a preset amount.

5. An automated method of creating traffic enforcement charts that show the effects of police enforcement on vehicle speed data captured by a plurality of vehicle sensor devices, each device being at a different fixed location in a region, each device capturing vehicle speed data of a plurality of vehicles that pass the device, the vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed, the method comprising:

(a) receiving and storing in a central computer database that is located remotely from the vehicles:

(i) the captured average vehicle speed data from the different fixed locations, and

(ii) an indication of whether police enforcement that is visually noticeable to vehicles is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals; and

(b) receiving at a server in communication with the central computer database:

(i) the captured vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed from the different fixed locations for a plurality of time intervals within a time period, and

(ii) an indication of whether the police enforcement is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals; and

(c) creating, by the server, a traffic enforcement chart for one of the fixed locations from the captured vehicle speed data and the police enforcement indications, the traffic enforcement chart including:

(i) a trend line of the average vehicle speed, and

(ii) a visual indicator of the time intervals when the police enforcement was present,

wherein the trend line visually communicates changes in average vehicle speed when the police enforcement is present and is not present.

6. The automated method of claim 5 further comprising:

(d) setting an alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off, the server calculating when the residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off by comparing average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present with average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is present.

7. The automated method of claim 6 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that residual enforcement has dropped by a predefined percentage effective amount.

8. The automated method of claim 6 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that the average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present has risen by a preset amount.

9. An apparatus for managing a traffic alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement on vehicle speed data has worn off, the vehicle speed data being captured by a plurality of vehicle sensor devices, each device being at a different fixed location in a region, each device capturing vehicle speed data of a plurality of vehicles that pass the device, the vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed, the apparatus comprising:

(a) a central computer database that is located remotely from the vehicles and which receives and stores:

(i) the captured average vehicle speed data from the different fixed locations, and

(ii) an indication of whether police enforcement that is visually noticeable to vehicles is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals; and

(b) a server in communication with the central computer database, the server:

(i) receiving the captured vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed from the different fixed locations for a plurality of time intervals within a time period,

(ii) receiving an indication of whether the police enforcement is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals,

(iii) calculating when the residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off by comparing average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present with average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is present, and

(iv) setting an alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the residual enforcement alert is set to a value that indicates that residual enforcement has dropped by a predefined percentage effective amount.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the residual enforcement alert is set to a value that indicates that the average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is present has risen by a preset amount.

12. An automated method of managing a traffic alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement on vehicle speed data has worn off, the vehicle speed data being captured by a plurality of vehicle sensor devices, each device being at a different fixed location in a region, each device capturing vehicle speed data of a plurality of vehicles that pass the device, the vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed, the method comprising:

(a) receiving and storing in a central computer database that is located remotely from the vehicles and which receives and stores:

(i) the captured average vehicle speed data from the different fixed locations, and

(ii) an indication of whether police enforcement that is visually noticeable to vehicles is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals;

(b) receiving at a server in communication with the central computer database:

(i) the captured vehicle speed data including average vehicle speed from the different fixed locations for a plurality of time intervals within a time period, and

(ii) an indication of whether the police enforcement is present at one or more of the different fixed locations during each of the time intervals;

(c) calculating, at the server, when the residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off by comparing average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present with average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is present; and

(d) setting an alert that is electronically sent to a recipient indicating when residual enforcement due to the effects of police enforcement has worn off.

13. The automated method of claim 12 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that residual enforcement has dropped by a predefined percentage effective amount.

14. The automated method of claim 12 wherein the alert is set to a value that indicates that the average vehicle speed during time intervals when police enforcement is not present has risen by a preset amount.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2025
From: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
To: BARINGS FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 072839/0173 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 072606/0760 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2021
From: PACIFIC WESTERN BANK
To: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 055577/0890 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2020
From: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: PACIFIC WESTERN BANK
Reel/Frame 052198/0241 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 18, 2020
From: JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER S.; GEIGER, JASON S.; GRAEF, JOHN T.
To: INTUITIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 051842/0945 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 18, 2020
From: INTUITIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC
To: ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 051950/0122 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 14753875 · Jun 29, 2015
Continuation 14300570 · Jun 10, 2014
Continuation 13792359 · Mar 11, 2013
Continuation 11901357 · Sep 17, 2007
Provisional Application 60845796 · Sep 19, 2006
Related Publication 20170061020A1 · Mar 2, 2017