IP Library Granted Patent US 9,864,280
Granted Patent B2
US 9,864,280 · App. 14/874,353 · Granted Jan 9, 2018

Overlay error correction

Inventors: Mangesh Bangar (San Jose, CA); Bruce E. Adams (Portland, OR); Kelly E. Hollar (Sunnyvale, CA); Abhilash J Mayur (Salinas, CA); Huixiong Dai (San Jose, CA); Jaujiun Chen (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Applied Materials, Inc.
G03F7/70633
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,864,280
App. No.
14/874,353
Granted
Jan 9, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A calibration curve for a wafer comprising a layer on a substrate is determined. The calibration curve represents a local parameter change as a function of a treatment parameter associated with a wafer exposure to a light. The local parameter of the wafer is measured. An overlay error is determined based on the local parameter of the wafer. A treatment map is computed based on the calibration curve to correct the overlay error for the wafer. The treatment map represents the treatment parameter as a function of a location on the wafer.

Claims (35)

1. A method to correct an overlay error, comprising:

determining a first calibration curve for a first wafer comprising a first layer on a substrate, the first calibration curve representing a local parameter change as a function of a first treatment parameter associated with a wafer exposure to a light;

measuring the local parameter of the first wafer;

determining a first overlay error based on the local parameter; and

computing a first treatment map based on the first calibration curve to correct the first overlay error for the first wafer, the first treatment map representing the first treatment parameter as a function of a location on the first wafer.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising processing the first wafer using the first treatment map.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

re-measuring the local parameter of the first wafer;

determining a second overlay error based on the re-measured local parameter;

determining if the second overlay error is greater than a predetermined threshold; and

computing a second treatment map for the first wafer based on the second overlay error, if the second overlay error is greater than the predetermined threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring a response of the local parameter of a reference wafer to a plurality of treatment conditions associated with a plurality of treatment parameters;

generating a plurality of calibration curves based on measuring;

determining a process window for each of the calibration curves, wherein the first calibration curve is selected from the plurality of calibration curves stored in a memory based at least on the process window.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first layer is a mask layer, and wherein the substrate comprises a multilayer stack.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first calibration curve is determined based on a characteristic of the first wafer.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first treatment parameter comprises a dose, a power, a fluence, a pulse width, a beam shape, a beam size, a wavelength, an exposure repetition rate, an exposure time, a scan speed, a number of flashes, a zone temperature, an ambient condition, an exposure mode, an exposure sequence, an exposure pattern, or any combination thereof.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the local parameter comprises a local stress curvature.

9. A non-transitory machine readable medium comprising instructions that cause a data processing system to perform operations comprising:

determining a first calibration curve for a first wafer comprising a first layer on a substrate, the first calibration curve representing a local parameter change as a function of a first treatment parameter associated with a wafer exposure to a light;

measuring the local parameter of the first wafer;

determining a first overlay error based on the local parameter; and

computing a first treatment map based on the first calibration curve to correct the first overlay error for the first wafer.

10. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , further comprising instructions that cause the data processing system to perform operations comprising processing the first wafer using the first treatment map.

11. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , further comprising instructions that cause the data processing system to perform operations comprising re-measuring the local parameter of the first wafer;

determining a second overlay error based on the re-measured local parameter;

determining if the second overlay error is greater than a predetermined threshold; and

computing a second treatment map for the first wafer based on the second overlay error, if the second overlay error is greater than the predetermined threshold.

12. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , further comprising instructions that cause the data processing system to perform operations comprising measuring a response of the local parameter of a reference wafer to a plurality of treatment conditions associated with a plurality of treatment parameters;

generating a plurality of calibration curves based on measuring;

determining a process window for each of the calibration curves, wherein the first calibration curve is selected from the plurality of calibration curves stored in a memory based at least on the process window.

13. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the first layer is a mask layer, and wherein the substrate comprises a multilayer stack.

14. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the first calibration curve is determined based on a characteristic of the first wafer.

15. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the first treatment parameter comprises a dose, a power, a fluence, a pulse width, a beam shape, a beam size, a wavelength, an exposure repetition rate, an exposure time, a scan speed, a number of flashes, a zone temperature, an ambient condition, an exposure mode, an exposure sequence, an exposure pattern, or any combination thereof.

16. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the local parameter comprises a local wafer curvature.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 25, 2015
From: BANGAR, MANGESH; ADAMS, BRUCE E.; HOLLAR, KELLY E.; MAYUR, ABHILASH J; DAI, HUIXIONG; CHEN, JAUJIUN
To: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
Reel/Frame 037144/0962 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170097576A1 · Apr 6, 2017