IP Library Granted Patent US 7,880,429
Granted Patent B2
US 7,880,429 · App. 12/119,922 · Granted Feb 1, 2011

Power management method using feedback current bias for simultaneously controlling low cells and overall stack voltage

Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,880,429
App. No.
12/119,922
Granted
Feb 1, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling the current output from a fuel cell stack to prevent the stack voltage or the minimum fuel cell voltage from dropping below predetermined voltage set-points. The method for the stack voltage control includes determining whether the stack voltage has dropped to the predetermined voltage set-point, and if so, capturing and holding the actual stack current at that point as the maximum allowed stack current. If the stack voltage continues to fall below the voltage set-point, then the voltage set-point is subtracted from the actual voltage to get a positive error signal. Controller gains are then multiplied by the error signal to reduce the current allowed from the stack to drive the error signal to zero, and increase the stack voltage. The method for the minimum fuel cell voltage operates in the same manner, but with different values.

Claims (41)

1. A method for reducing and controlling the current output from a fuel cell stack in response to an output voltage of the fuel cell stack dropping to a predetermined stack voltage set-point, said method comprising:

determining whether the stack voltage has dropped to the predetermined voltage set-point;

holding the current output that is being drawn from the fuel cell stack when the voltage drops to the voltage set-point as a maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack;

determining whether the stack voltage has dropped below the stack voltage set-point;

subtracting the stack voltage set-point from the actual stack voltage to get a first positive error signal if the stack voltage has dropped below the voltage set-point; and

multiplying the error signal by at least one gain signal so as to reduce the maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack and drive the first positive error signal to zero.

2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising determining whether the stack voltage is below a predetermined threshold voltage that is greater than the stack voltage set-point, and if so, subtracting the voltage set-point from the actual stack voltage to get a second positive error signal and multiplying the second positive error signal by a predetermined gain to reduce the second positive error signal to zero and reduce the stack voltage to the voltage set-point.

3. The method according to claim 2 further comprising determining whether there was a previous stack current output limitation as a result of a low stack voltage if the stack voltage is not below the threshold voltage, and further comprising holding the maximum stack current output allowed at a previous maximum stack current output allowed when the stack voltage was below the voltage threshold for a predetermined period of time if there was a current limitation due to low stack voltage.

4. The method according to claim 2 wherein the predetermined gain multiplied by the second positive error signal is an integral gain for an integral controller.

5. The method according to claim 1 further comprising rate limiting an increase in current output if the stack voltage falls to the predetermined voltage set-point and then is increased.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the at least one gain is an integral gain and a proportional gain for a proportional-integral controller.

7. The method according to claim 6 wherein the integral gain is constant and the proportional gain is a function of the stack current.

8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the predetermined stack voltage set-point is 220 volts.

9. A method for reducing and controlling the current output from a fuel cell stack in response to an output voltage of the fuel cell stack dropping to a predetermined stack voltage set-point, said method comprising:

determining whether the stack voltage has dropped below a predetermined voltage threshold that is more than the voltage set-point;

determining whether the stack voltage is greater than the voltage set-point if the stack voltage has dropped below the voltage threshold;

determining whether the stack voltage is equal to the voltage set-point;

determining whether the stack voltage has dropped below the voltage set-point;

holding the current output from the fuel cell stack if the stack voltage drops equals the voltage set-point as a maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack;

subtracting the stack voltage set-point from the actual stack voltage to get a first positive error signal if the stack voltage drops below the voltage set-point;

multiplying the first positive error signal by at least one gain signal so as to reduce the maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack and drive the first positive error signal to zero;

subtracting the voltage set-point from the actual stack voltage to get a second positive error signal if the stack voltage is between the voltage threshold and the voltage set-point;

multiplying the second positive error signal by a gain to set the maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack;

determining whether there was a previous current limitation as a result of low stack voltage if the stack voltage is not less than the predetermined voltage threshold; and

holding the maximum stack current output allowed at a previous maximum stack current output allowed when the stack voltage was below the voltage threshold for a predetermined period of time if there was a current limitation due to low stack voltage.

10. The method according to claim 9 further comprising rate limiting an increase in current output of the stack if the stack voltage falls to the predetermined voltage set-point and then is increased.

11. The method according to claim 9 wherein the at least one gain is an integral gain and a proportional gain and the gain for the second positive error signal is an integral gain for a proportional-integral controller.

12. The method according to claim 9 wherein the stack voltage set-point is 220 volts and the voltage threshold is 230 volts.

13. A method for reducing and controlling the current output from a fuel cell stack in response to a minimum fuel cell voltage of a fuel cell in the stack dropping to a predetermined minimum fuel cell voltage set-point, said method comprising:

determining whether the minimum fuel cell voltage has dropped to the predetermined minimum fuel cell voltage set-point;

holding the current output that is being drawn from the fuel cell stack when the voltage drops to the voltage set-point as a maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack;

determining whether the minimum fuel cell voltage has dropped below the minimum fuel cell voltage set-point;

subtracting the minimum fuel cell voltage set-point from the actual minimum fuel cell voltage to get a first positive error signal if the minimum fuel cell voltage has dropped below the voltage set-point; and

multiplying the error signal by at least one gain signal so as to reduce the maximum stack current output allowed from the fuel cell stack and drive the first positive error signal to zero.

14. The method according to claim 13 further comprising determining whether the minimum fuel cell voltage is below a predetermined threshold voltage that is greater than the minimum fuel cell voltage set-point, and if so, subtracting the voltage set-point from the actual minimum fuel cell voltage to get a second positive error signal and multiplying the second positive error signal by a predetermined gain to reduce the second positive error signal to zero and reduce the minimum fuel cell voltage to the voltage set-point.

15. The method according to claim 14 further comprising determining whether there was a previous stack current output limitation as a result of a minimum fuel cell voltage if the minimum fuel cell voltage is not below the threshold voltage, and further comprising holding the maximum stack current output allowed at a previous maximum stack current output allowed when the minimum fuel cell voltage was below the voltage threshold for a predetermined period of time if there was a current limitation due to minimum fuel cell voltage.

16. The method according to claim 14 wherein the predetermined gain multiplied by the second positive error signal is an integral gain for an integral controller.

17. The method according to claim 13 further comprising rate limiting an increase in current output if the minimum fuel cell voltage falls to the predetermined voltage set-point and then is increased.

18. The method according to claim 13 wherein the at least one gain is an integral gain and a proportional gain for a proportional-integral controller.

19. The method according to claim 18 wherein the integral gain is constant and the proportional gain is a function of the stack current.

20. The method according to claim 13 wherein the predetermined minimum fuel cell voltage set-point is 300 mV.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034384/0758 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0211 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0475 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0780 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0187 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0215 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0880 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0670 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0538 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 3, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022195/0334 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2008
From: ARTHUR, DAVID A.; GANAPATHY, SRIRAM
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 020942/0600 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090284214A1 · Nov 19, 2009