IP Library Granted Patent US 8,176,793
Granted Patent B2
US 8,176,793 · App. 12/333,567 · Granted May 15, 2012

Method to estimate the effect of weld location on weld strength

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,176,793
App. No.
12/333,567
Granted
May 15, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process includes monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces, diagnosing the weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of the work pieces, and identifying said failed weld based on the diagnosing.

Claims (81)

1. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld based upon said evaluating; and

wherein said evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge comprises:

comparing said location of said weld to a nominal location of said weld; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said location of said weld varies from said nominal location by more than a threshold maximum distance.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring a location of said weld comprises utilizing a machine vision system.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring a location of said weld comprises utilizing physical probes measuring location data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring a location of said weld comprises monitoring movement of welding machinery utilized to create said weld.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising repairing said work pieces based upon said identifying said failed weld.

6. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld based upon said evaluating; and

wherein said evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge comprises:

comparing said location of said weld to a 3D model of said work pieces to determine a distance from said location of said weld to said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said distance is less than a threshold minimum distance from said closest edge.

7. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld based upon said evaluating; and

wherein said evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge comprises:

monitoring accepted weld location data from a data referencing device;

comparing said location of said weld to said accepted weld location data; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said location of said weld violates said accepted weld location data.

8. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

determining a predicted weld strength based upon said location of said weld comparing said predicted weld strength to a required weld strength for said weld; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said predicted weld strength is less than said required weld strength.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said determining said predicted weld strength is based upon experimentally testing yield strength of samples of said work pieces welded in various locations.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein said determining said predicted weld strength is based upon modeling said work pieces and a resulting distance to said closest edge based upon said location of said weld.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein said modeling further comprises factoring material properties and predicted weld geometry based upon said location of said weld.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein said determining said predicted weld strength is further based upon a yield strength of a material of said work pieces and a coupon thickness of said work pieces.

13. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld based upon said evaluating; and

wherein said evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge comprises:

monitoring a defined safe zone for the weld;

comparing said location of said weld to said defined safe zone; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said location of said weld is outside of said defined safe zone.

14. Method to diagnose a failed weld in a welding process, comprising:

monitoring a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

diagnosing said weld as a failed weld based on said location with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces; and

identifying said failed weld based on said diagnosing;

wherein said diagnosing said weld as a failed weld comprises:

evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge; and

diagnosing said failed weld based upon said evaluating; and

wherein said evaluating said location of said weld with respect to a distance from said closest edge comprises:

monitoring a defined edge zone for the weld;

comparing said location of said weld to said defined edge zone; and

diagnosing said failed weld if said location of said weld is inside of said defined edge zone.

15. Method to diagnose a failed welding process, comprising:

monitoring locations of a plurality of welds created on a set of work pieces;

determining a weld strength for each of said welds based on said locations with respect to a closest edge of one of said work pieces for each weld;

determining a resulting strength in said overall set of work pieces based upon compilation of said weld strengths; and

identifying said failed weld process based on said resulting strength in said overall set of work pieces.

16. Apparatus to diagnose a weld failure in a welding process, comprising:

a control module, including programming to:

monitor a location of a weld created on a plurality of work pieces;

determine a distance from said location of said weld to a closest edge of said work pieces;

determine a predicted strength of said weld based upon said distance;

compare said predicted strength of said weld to a required strength of said weld; and

diagnose said weld failure based upon said comparing.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , further comprising a machine vision system generating said location of said weld.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0789 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0245 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0515 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0046 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0909 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0313 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2009
From: WANG, PEI-CHUNG; MARIN, SAMUEL P.; HUTCHINSON, DANIEL C.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022159/0968 →