IP Library Granted Patent US 11,163,021
Granted Patent B2
US 11,163,021 · App. 16/809,823 · Granted Nov 2, 2021

Sensors having signal redundancy

Inventors: Andreas P. Friedrich (Metz-Tessy, FR); Christophe Lutz (Vitry-sur-Seine, FR)
Assignee: Allegro MicroSystems, LLC
G01R33/072G01C21/36G01D5/14G01R33/0005G01R33/0029
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,163,021
App. No.
16/809,823
Granted
Nov 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus for combining redundant signals to generate outputs signals with enhanced accuracy and/or risk level. In embodiments, first signals are generated by a first transducer and second signals are generated by a second transducer. In other embodiments, first signals are generated by a first die and second signals are generated by a second die. An amount of overlap between error distributions of the first and second signals can be used to detect failure and/or indicate risk of failure.

Claims (54)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving first signals from a first signal source;

receiving second signals from a second signal source, wherein the first and second signals are redundant; and

combining the first signals and the second signals to generate a first output signal from the first signals, a second output signal from the second signals, and a third output signal from the first signals and the second signals.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further including generating a fourth output signal from first and second signals providing uncertainty and/or risk information.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first signal source comprises a first transducer and the second signal source comprises a second transducer.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the first and second transducers are substantially similar.

5. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the first and second transducers are substantially dissimilar or of different nature.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first signal source comprises a first die and the second signal source comprises a second die.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the third output signal comprises a combination, such as average, of the first and second signals.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the combination comprises an average.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the third output signal is more accurate than the first or second output signals taken independently.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second signals each comprise sine and cosine values.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the first, second, and third output signals each comprise processed signals from transducers.

12. The method according to claim 1 , further including generating a fourth output signal from first and second signals providing risk information based on a comparison of similarity of the first signals and the second signals.

13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein the comparison of similarity includes using a threshold based on degrees for angle signals generated from sine and cosine signals.

14. The method according to claim 1 , further including assigning a first error distribution to the first signals and a second error distribution to the second signals.

15. The method according to claim 14 , further including assigning rectangular functions to the first and second error distributions.

16. The method according to claim 15 , further including assigning a given number of standard deviations to defines the rectangular functions.

17. The method according to claim 14 , further including assigning Gaussian functions to the first and second error distributions.

18. The method according to claim 14 , further including determining an amount of overlap between the first and second error distributions.

19. The method according to claim 18 , further including determining a failure condition based on the amount of overlap.

20. The method according to claim 19 , further including determining a level of confidence in the first and/or second signals from the amount of overlap or intersection of distributions.

21. The method according to claim 18 , further including determining a best estimate for the first and/or second signals from the amount of overlap.

22. A system, comprising:

a first signal source configured to generate first signals;

a second signal source to generate second signals, wherein the first and second signals are redundant; and

a signal processing module configure to combine the first signals and the second signals to generate a first output signal from the first signals, a second output signal from the second signals, and a third output signal from the first signals and the second signals.

23. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the signal processing module is further configured to generate a fourth output signal from first and second signals providing risk information.

24. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the first signal source comprises a first transducer and the second signal source comprises a second transducer.

25. The system according to claim 24 , wherein the first and second transducers are substantially similar.

26. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the first signal source comprises a first die and the second signal source comprises a second die.

27. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the third output signal comprises a combination, of the first and second signals.

28. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the third output signal is more accurate than the first or second output signals.

29. The system according to claim 22 , wherein the first and second signals each comprise sine and cosine values.

30. The system according to claim 29 , wherein the first, second, and third output signals each comprise an angle output signal.

31. The system according to claim 22 , further including generating a fourth output signal from first and second signals providing risk information based on a comparison of similarity of the first signals and the second signals.

32. The system according to claim 31 , wherein the comparison of similarity includes using a threshold based on degrees for angle signals generated from sine and cosine signals.

33. The system according to claim 22 , further including assigning a first error distribution to the first signals and a second error distribution to the second signals.

34. The system according to claim 33 , further including assigning rectangular functions to the first and second error distributions.

35. The system according to claim 34 , further including assigning a given number of standard deviations to defines the rectangular functions.

36. The system according to claim 34 , further including determining an amount of overlap between the first and second error distributions.

37. The system according to claim 36 , further including determining a failure condition based on the amount of overlap.

38. The system according to claim 36 , further including determining a level of confidence in the first and/or second signals from the amount of overlap.

39. The system according to claim 36 , further including determining a best estimate for the first and/or second signals from the amount of overlap.

40. The system according to claim 33 , further including assigning Gaussian functions to the first and/or second error distributions.

41. A system, comprising:

a first signal source means for generating first signals;

a second signal source means for generating second signals, wherein the first and second signals are redundant; and

a signal processing means for combining the first signals and the second signals to generate a first output signal from the first signals, a second output signal from the second signals, and a third output signal from the first signals and the second signals.

42. The system according to claim 41 , wherein the signal processing means further generates a fourth output signal from first and second signals providing risk information.

43. The system according to claim 41 , wherein the first signal source means comprises a first transducer and the second signal source means comprises a second transducer.

44. The system according to claim 43 , wherein the first and second transducers are substantially similar.

45. The system according to claim 41 , wherein the first signal source means comprises a first die and the second signal source means comprises a second die.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 053957/FRAME 0874 Recorded Nov 1, 2023
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 065420/0572 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (R/F 053957/0620) Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: MIZUHO BANK, LTD., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 064068/0360 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS THE COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064068/0459 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 1, 2020
From: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
To: MIZUHO BANK LTD., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 053957/0620 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 1, 2020
From: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 053957/0874 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2020
From: FRIEDRICH, ANDREAS P.; LUTZ, CHRISTOPHE; ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS FRANCE SAS; ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS EUROPE LIMITED
To: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 052052/0167 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210278485A1 · Sep 9, 2021
Cited By (2)
US 12,618,875 US 12,656,420