IP Library Granted Patent US 12,515,166
Granted Patent B2
US 12,515,166 · App. 18/133,023 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Electrochemical desalination system

Inventors: Eugene S. Beh (Portola Valley, CA); Jessica Louis Baker Rivest (Palo Alto, CA); Michael Benedict (Palo Alto, CA); Elif Karatay (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Genesee Valley Innovations, LLC
B01D53/1425B01D53/263B01D61/422B01D61/44B01D61/461C02F1/4693H01M8/188H01M8/227B01D2313/28B01D2313/30B01D2313/345B01D2313/36B01D2313/50C02F2103/08C02F2303/10H01M2250/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,515,166
App. No.
18/133,023
Filed
Apr 11, 2023
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
1776
USPC
95/206
Abstract

A system comprises an electrodialysis apparatus, which includes first and second reservoirs, wherein a salt concentration in the first reservoir reduces below a threshold concentration and salt concentration in the second reservoir increases during an operation mode. A first electrode comprises a first solution of a first redox-active electrolyte material, and a second electrode comprises a second solution of a second redox-active electrolyte material. In a first reversible redox reaction between the first electrode and first electrolyte material at least one ion is accepted from the first reservoir, and in a second reversible redox reaction between the second electrode and second electrolyte material at least one ion is driven into the second reservoir. A first type of membrane is disposed between the first and second reservoirs, and a second type of membrane, different from the first type, is disposed between the respective electrodes and reservoirs.

Claims (24)

1 . A method for separating a solvent from a salt dissolved in the solvent, comprising:

providing an electrodialysis apparatus comprising:

a first reservoir comprising a first input and a first output, wherein the salt dissolved in the solvent in the first reservoir is reduced below a threshold concentration during an operation mode;

a second reservoir comprising a second input and a second output, wherein the salt dissolved in the solvent in the second reservoir increases in concentration during the operation mode;

a first electrode contacting a first aqueous solution of a first redox-active electrolyte material and configured to have a first reversible redox reaction with the first redox-active electrolyte material, and the first redox-active electrolyte material accepts a salt ion of the salt from the solvent in the first reservoir;

a second electrode contacting a second aqueous solution of a second redox-active electrolyte material and configured to have a second reversible redox reaction with the second redox-active electrolyte material, and drive a salt ion of the salt from the second redox-active electrolyte material into the solvent in the second reservoir, wherein at least one of the first and second redox-active electrolyte materials comprises a ferrocene derivative that is chemically stable in oxidized and reduced forms to reaction with oxygen gas;

a first type of membrane disposed between the first and second reservoirs;

a second type of membrane, different from the first type, disposed between the first electrode and the first reservoir and disposed between the second electrode and the second reservoir;

transporting solvent having a first concentration of dissolved salt into the first and second reservoirs;

operating the electrodialysis apparatus to generate a first stream having a second concentration of the dissolved salt that is lower than the first concentration of the dissolved salt and to generate a second stream having a third concentration of the dissolved salt that is higher than the first concentration of the dissolved salt; and

transporting the first stream through a switching unit to a further desalination system to generate a further stream having a final concentration of the dissolved salt that is lower than second concentration of the dissolved salt, wherein the further desalination system uses a solvent treatment process different from the electrodialysis apparatus.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first aqueous solution and the second aqueous solution are the same and the first and second aqueous solutions are circulated between the first electrode and the second electrode during the operation mode and the electrodialysis apparatus operates in an electrodialysis mode.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first aqueous solution is an anolyte and the second aqueous solution is a catholyte, and the anolyte and the catholyte are different chemical species.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the electrodialysis apparatus operates in a charge mode or a discharge mode.

5 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the electrodialysis apparatus operates alternately between a charge mode and a discharge mode.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising operating the electrodialysis apparatus in a discharge mode to generate power and powering at least a portion of the further desalination system with the power generated from the electrodialysis apparatus.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the switching unit is coupled to the first and second outputs of the first and second reservoirs and at least one output of the switching unit is coupled to the input of the further desalination system.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the further desalination system is a reverse osmosis system.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the further desalination system is a thermal evaporation system.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the further desalination system is a capacitive deionization system.

11 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the final concentration of the dissolved salt is less than 0.5 ppt.

12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the further desalination system is coupled to a second electrodialysis apparatus through the switching unit.

13 . The method according to claim 12 , further comprising powering at least a portion of the further desalination system with power generated from the electrodialysis apparatus.

14 . The method according to claim 12 , wherein the first concentration of dissolved salt is about 35 ppt, and the final concentration of the dissolved salt is about 0.5 ppt.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073225/0116 →
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
Continuity (4)
Division 16200309 · Nov 26, 2018
Provisional Application 62628573 · Feb 9, 2018
Provisional Application 62627449 · Feb 7, 2018
Related Publication 20230264140A1 · Aug 24, 2023
References Cited (141)
US 2672024A · Mcgrath · 1954 [cited by applicant]
US 3657106A · Smith · 1972 [cited by examiner]
US 4118299A · Maget · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4593534A · Bloomfield · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4984434A · Peterson et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 6159352A · Riera et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6187201B1 · Abe et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6719891B2 · Ruhr et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7083730B2 · Davis · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7974076B2 · Xiong et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7992855B2 · Awano · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8142633B2 · Batchelder et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8545692B2 · James et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8769972B2 · Bahar · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8801910B2 · Bazant et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8999132B2 · Bazant et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9112217B2 · Kim et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9340436B2 · Sahu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9546426B2 · Logan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9548620B2 · Hu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9640826B2 · Yan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9670077B2 · Volkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9673472B2 · Volkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9905876B2 · Schubert et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10124296B2 · Pozzo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10525417B2 · Newbloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10550014B2 · Desai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10821395B2 · Beh · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10822254B2 · Desai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11015875B2 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11020713B2 · Demeter et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11117090B2 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11149970B2 · Bahar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11185823B2 · Beh et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20030224235A1 · Park et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040055955A1 · Davis · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050183956A1 · Katefidis · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060141346A1 · Gordon et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20100227247A1 · Pintauro et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130015071A1 · Willis · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150048777A1 · Goldstein · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150228950A1 · Moon et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150232348A1 · Jepson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150273396A1 · Hancock · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150349368A1 · Arges et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170113951A1 · Su · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180191012A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190047880A1 · Desai · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190240623A1 · Beh · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190322558A1 · Goel · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200070094A1 · Hussaini et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200164312A1 · Beh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200384421A1 · Newbloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200388871A1 · Newbloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210039970A1 · Metzger · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210292290A1 · Capuzzi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210370228A1 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 206055832 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108187459 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 111048813A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3336064 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 0418919 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130106530 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150034545 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 20200140781A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014181898 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 20150143332 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018032003 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018119280 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 20180191806 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
“Lazard's Levelized Cost of Storage—Version 2.0.” 2016, 46 pages. [cited by applicant]
Al-Jubainawi et al., “Factors governing mass transfer during membrane electrodialysis regeneration of LiCI solution for liquid desiccant dehumidification systems”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 28, Aug. 26, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Al-Karaghouli et al., “Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013, 24, 343-356. [cited by applicant]
Anderson et al., Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: Will it compete?:, Electrochimica Acta 2010, 55 (12), 3845-… [cited by applicant]
Arellano et al., “Effects of pH on the degradation of aqueous ferricyanide by photolysis and photocatalysis under solar radiation”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2010, 94 (2), 327-332. [cited by applicant]
ASHRAE Standard, “Method of Testing for Rating Desiccant Dehumidifiers Utilizing Heat for the Regeneration Process”, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Bajpayee et al., “Very low temperature membrane-free desalination by directional solvent extraction”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (5), 1672. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., “A Neutral pH Aqueous Organic-Organometallic Redox Flow Battery with Extremely High Capacity Retention” ACS Energy Lett, 2017, 2, pp. 639-644. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/200,309, filed Nov. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/378,769, filed Apr. 9, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Benedict et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/200,376, filed Nov. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Benedict et al., U.S. Appl. No. 16/386,389, filed Apr. 17, 2019. [cited by applicant]
BTMAP-VI et al., “Ordering and Customer Service Neutral pH Aqueous Redox Flow Battery Materials”, Jan. 1, 2017, p. 639. [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al., “Double-Stage Photovoltaic/Thermal ED Regeneration for Liquid Desiccant Cooling System”, Energy and Buildings, 51, 2012, pp. 64-72. [cited by applicant]
Dai, “Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models”, Nat. Clim.Change 2013, 3 (1), 52-58. [cited by applicant]
Darling et al., “Pathways to low-cost electrochemical energy storage: a comparison of aqueous and nonaqueous low batteries”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (11), 3459-3477. [cited by applicant]
Desai et al., “Electrochemical Desalination of Seawater and Hypersaline Brines with Coupled Electricity Storage”, ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2, 2018, pp. 375-379. [cited by applicant]
Desalination Experts Group, “Desalination in the GCC”, 2014, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dipaola, “Saudi Arabia Gets Cheapest Bids for Solar Power in Auction”Bloomberg, Jan. 16, 2018, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Epsztein et al., “Activation behavior for ion permeation in ion-exchange membranes: Role of ion dehydration in selective transport”, Journal of Membrane Science 580, 2019, pp. 316-326. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP 22150661.1 issued by the European Patent Office on Jun. 9, 2022; 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ferguson et al., “Studies on Overvoltage. IX: The Nature of Cathode and Anode Discharge Potentials at Several Metal Surfaces1,2”, J. Phys. Chem. 1937, 42 (2), 171-190. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., “A zinc-iron redox-flow battery under $100 per kWh of system capital cost”, Energy & Environmental Science, 2015. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., All-Soluble All-Iron Aqueous Redox-Flow Battery, ACS Energy Letters, 2016, 1, pp. 89-93. [cited by applicant]
Gowin, “Examining the economics of seawater desalination using the DEEP code”, Nuclear Power Technology Development Section, I. A. E. A., Ed. Vienna, Austria, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Gu et al., “A multiple ion-exchange membrane design for redox flow batteries”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (9), 2986. [cited by applicant]
Hilbert et al., “Correlations between the Kinetics of Electrolytic Dissolution and Deposition of Iron: I . The Anodic Dissolution of Iron”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 1971, 118 (12), 1919-1926. [cited by applicant]
Howell et al., “Overview of the DOE VTO Advanced Battery R&D Program”, Jun. 6, 2016 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al, “Long-Cycling Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Battery (AORFB) toward Sustainable and Safe Energy Storage”, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (3), 1207-1214. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 9, 2020 for PCT/2019/063157 dated Mar. 9, 2020, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 9, 2020 for PCT/US2019/062924, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
John et al., “Seasonal cycles of temperature, salinity and water masses of the western Arabian gulf”, Oceanol. Acta 1990, 13 (3), 273-281. [cited by applicant]
Kaibara et al., Study of Ion Transport across Amphoteric Ion Exchange Membrane. II. Transport of Symmetric Tetraalkylammonium Chlorides?,, Bull. Chem. Sco. Jpn, 56, 1983, pp. 1346-1350. [cited by applicant]
Khawaji et al., “Advances in seawater desalination technologies”, Desalination 2008, 221 (1-3), 47-69. [cited by applicant]
Konopka et al., “Diffusion coefficients of ferri- and ferrocyanide ions in aqueous media, using twin-electrode thin-layer electrochemistry”, Anal. Chem. 1970, 42 (14), 1741-1746. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Kozubal et al., “Low-Flow Liquid Desiccant Air-Conditioning: Demonstrated Performance and Cost Implications” NREL Technical Report, Sep. 2014, 104 pages. [cited by applicant]
La Mantia et al., “Batteries for efficient energy extraction from a water salinity difference”, Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (4), 1810-3. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Desalination of a thermal power plant wastewater by membrane capacitive deionization”, Desalination 196, 2006, pp. 125-134. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Rocking chair desalination battery based on Prussian blue electrodes”, ACS Omega 2017, 2 (4), 1653-1659. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Photovoltaic-electrodialysis regeneration method for liquid desiccant cooling system”, Solar Energy, vol. 83, 2009, pp. 2195-2204. [cited by applicant]
Logan et al, “Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water”, Nature 2012, 488, 313. [cited by applicant]
Loutatidou, et al., “Capital cost estimation of RO plants: GCC countries versus southern Europe”, Desalination 2014, 347, 103-111. [cited by applicant]
Malhotra et al., “Use cases for stationary battery technologies: A review of the literature and existing projects”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56, 2016, pp. 705-721. [cited by applicant]
Mcgovern et al., “On the cost of electrodialysis for the desalination of high salinity feeds”, Applied Energy 136, Dec. 2014, pp. 649-661. [cited by applicant]
Moore et al., “Evaporation from Brine Solutions Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions; Report 77 for the Texas Water Development Board”, May 1968, 77 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nair et al., “Water desalination and challenges: The Middle East perspective: a review”, Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51 (10-12), 2030-2040. [cited by applicant]
Oren, “Capacitive deionization (CDI) for desalination and water treatment—past, present and future (a review)”, Desalination 2008, 228 (1-3), 10-29. [cited by applicant]
Pasta et al., “A desalination battery” Nano Lett.2012, 12 (2), 839-43. [cited by applicant]
Patil et al., “Diffusivity of some zinc and cobalt salts in water”, J. Chem. Eng. Data 1993, 38 (4), 574-576. [cited by applicant]
Petrova et al., “Perfluorinated hybrid membranes modified by metal decorated clay nanotubes”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 582, Jul. 15, 2019, pp. 172-181. [cited by applicant]
Pismenskaya et al., “Can the electrochemical performance of heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes be better than that of homogeneous membranes?”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 566, Nov. 15, 2018, pp. 54-68. [cited by applicant]
Sadrzadeh et al., “Sea water desalination using electrodialysis”, Desalination 2008, 221 (1), 440-447. [cited by applicant]
Sata, “Application of Ion Exchange Membranes. In Ion Exchange Membranes: Preparation, Characterization, Modification and Application”, The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Schaetzle et al., “Salinity Gradient Energy: Current State and New Trends”, Engineering, vol. 1, Issue 2, Jun. 2016, pp. 164-166. [cited by applicant]
Scialdone et al., “Investigation of electrode material—Redox couple systems for reverse electrodialysis processes. Part I: Iron redox couples”, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2012, 681 (Supplement C), 66-75. [cited by applicant]
Seto et al., “Seawater desalination by electrodialysis”, Desalination 1978, 25 (1), 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Comparative Studies on Performance of Interpolymer and Heterogeneous Ion-Exchange Membranes for Water Desalination by Electrodialysis”, Desalination 172, 2005, pp. 257-265. [cited by applicant]
Solveichik, “Flow batteries: current status and trends”, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (20), 11533-58. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Stillwell et al., “Predicting the specific energy consumption of reverse osmosis desalination”, Water 2016, 8 (12). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/200,309, filed Apr. 20, 2022; 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Urban, “Emerging Scientific and Engineering Opportunities within the Water-Energy Nexus”, Joule, Dec. 20, 2017, pp. 665-688. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Energy, “Desiccant Enhanced Evaporative Air-Conditioning (DEVap): Evaluation of a New Concept in Ultra Efficient Air Conditioning”, Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-49722, 2011. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Energy, “Energy Savings Potential and RD&D Opportunities for Commercial Building HVAC Systems”, Dec. 2017, 172 pages. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Interior/US Geological Survey, Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2010, 2014, 64 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vermaas et al., “High Efficiency in Energy Generation from Salinity Gradients with Reverse Electrodialysis”, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1, 2013, pp. 1295-1302. [cited by applicant]
Viswanathan et al., “Cost and performance model for redox flow batteries”, Journal of Power Sources, vol. 247, Dec. 23, 2012, pp. 1040-1051. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Continuous desalination with a metal-free redox-mediator”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, No. 7, 2019, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Woods, “Membrane processes for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 33, 2014, pp. 290-304. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Kinetic study on regeneration of Fe(II)EDTA in the wet process of NO removal”, Chemical Engineering Journal 2008, 140 (1), 130-135. [cited by applicant]
Ye et al., “Performance of a mixing entropy battery alternately flushed with wastewater effluent and seawater for recovery of salinity gradient energy”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (7), 2295-2300. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “A Natural Driven Membrane Process for Brackish and Wastewater Treatment: Photovoltaic Powered ED and FO Hybrid System”, Environmental Science and Technology, Sep. 4, 2013, pp. 10548-10555. [cited by applicant]