IP Library Granted Patent US 7,136,798
Granted Patent B2
US 7,136,798 · App. 10/064,486 · Granted Nov 14, 2006

Method and apparatus to manage multi-computer demand

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,136,798
App. No.
10/064,486
Granted
Nov 14, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, multi-computer media and apparatus that uses an economics model to manage the demand and the resource satisfying that demand for multi-computer memory. The present invention quantifies demand as a function of space, and computer resource as a function of time, so that a computational system can meet an application demand.

Claims (42)

1. A method to determine the memory requirements of an application running in parallel on the system, comprising the steps of:

inputting a model and initializing a computational domain;

calculating a data density for each control element;

calculating demand cost for each sub-domain;

minimizing the difference in average demand cost;

ranking the processors by value; and

generating a data ownership table and frame file.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the model is a discretized system model of a physical system.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the domain into a number of equal sized geographic sub-domains with respect to the space coordinates of the model.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the sub-domains into an integer fraction of rows and/or columns.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein data density within the sub-domains is represented by linear, area, and volume data demand functions.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the demand cost is an area under a data density curve and is calculated by a numerical integration method.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises adjusting the sub-domain size by “moving” bisectors.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises recomputing data density based on a grid in each size adjusted sub-domain.

9. A system of networked computers having a plurality of processors and an operating system for executing a target parallel application process using at least a subset of said plurality of processors, wherein said system includes a method to determine the memory requirements of an application running in parallel on the system, said method comprising:

inputting a model and initializing a computational domain;

calculating a data density for each control element;

calculating demand cost for each sub-domain;

minimizing the difference in average demand cost;

ranking the processors by value; and

generating a data ownership table and frame file.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the model is a discretized system model of a physical system.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the domain into a number of equal sized geographic sub-domains with respect to the space coordinates of the model.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the sub-domains into an integer fraction of rows and/or columns.

13. The method of claim 9 wherein data density within the sub-domains is represented by linear, area, and volume data demand functions.

14. The method of claim 9 wherein the demand cost is an area under a data density curve and is calculated by a numerical integration method.

15. The method of claim 9 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises adjusting the sub-domain size by “moving” bisectors.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises recomputing data density based on a grid in each size adjusted sub-domain.

17. A signal-bearing medium tangibly embodying a program of machine-readable instructions executable by a digital processing apparatus to determine the memory requirements of an application running in parallel on the system, said machine-readable instructions comprising:

inputting a model and initializing a computational domain;

calculating a data density for each control element;

calculating demand cost for each sub-domain;

minimizing the difference in average demand cost;

ranking the processors by value; and

generating a data ownership table and frame file.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the model is a discretized system model of a physical system.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the domain into a number of equal sized geographic sub-domains with respect to the space coordinates of the model.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein initializing a computational domain also comprises dividing the sub-domains into an integer fraction of rows and/or columns.

21. The method of claim 17 wherein data density within the sub-domains is represented by linear, area, and volume data demand functions.

22. The method of claim 17 wherein the demand cost is an area under a data density curve and is calculated by a numerical integration method.

23. The method of claim 17 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises adjusting the sub-domain size by “moving” bisectors.

24. The method of claim 17 wherein minimizing the difference in average demand cost also comprises recomputing data density based on a grid in each size adjusted sub-domain.

Assignments (5)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.
Reel/Frame 056987/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2020
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
Reel/Frame 054636/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 29, 2018
From: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 049490/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 5, 2015
From: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC; GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC.
Reel/Frame 036779/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2015
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC
Reel/Frame 036550/0001 →