IP Library Granted Patent US 7,981,473
Granted Patent B2
US 7,981,473 · App. 10/791,334 · Granted Jul 19, 2011

Transient enhanced atomic layer deposition

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,981,473
App. No.
10/791,334
Granted
Jul 19, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process in which a wafer is exposed to a first chemically reactive precursor dose insufficient to result in a maximum saturated ALD deposition rate on the wafer, and then to a second chemically reactive precursor dose, the precursors being distributed in a manner so as to provide substantially uniform film deposition. The second chemically reactive precursor dose may likewise be insufficient to result in a maximum saturated ALD deposition rate on the wafer or, alternatively, sufficient to result in a starved saturating deposition on the wafer. The process may or may not include purges between the precursor exposures, or between one set of exposures and not another.

Claims (29)

1. An atomic layer deposition (ALD) process using starved reactions, said ALD process comprising:

exposing a wafer to a starved dose of a first chemically reactive precursor, said starved dose being selected to yield less than one-half of a maximum saturated ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for said first chemically reactive precursor, wherein said first chemically reactive precursor is a soft saturating precursor characterized by an onset of a slow increase in ALD growth rate with further increases of precursor exposure dose and having a longer saturation time as compared to a second chemically reactive precursor to follow the first chemically reactive precursor, and the exposure to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor determines a value of a starved saturation ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for a second chemically reactive precursor to follow the first chemically reactive precursor; and

exposing the wafer to a dose of the second chemically reactive precursor, the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor selected for achieving starved saturation of the second chemically reactive precursor under variations in dose of the second chemically reactive precursor, said starved saturation characterized by an ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, of the second chemically reactive precursor being less than half of a maximum saturated ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for the second precursor,

wherein:

said starved dose of said first chemically reactive precursor and the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor are selected to obtain a maximum starved ALD process film deposition rate as measured in film thickness per unit time for the first and second chemically reactive precursors, and

said first and second chemically reactive precursors are delivered sequentially in time.

2. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor is delivered substantially uniformly over the wafer.

3. The ALD process of claim 1 , further comprising repeatedly exposing the wafer to the first and second chemically reactive precursor doses to form a material film on the wafer.

4. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein a non-uniformity of a thickness of a resulting film is within +/− 1.5%, 1 sigma.

5. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein the first and second chemically reactive precursors are delivered substantially uniformly via a showerhead or distribution plate.

6. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein a purge follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor, but no purge follows exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

7. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein exposure of the wafer to the second chemically reactive precursor follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor without a purge, and a purge is used following exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

8. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein purges follow exposure of the wafer to both the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor, and the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

9. The ALD process of claim 1 , wherein exposure of the wafer to the second chemically reactive precursor follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor without a purge, and no purge is used following exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

10. An atomic layer deposition (ALD) process using starved reactions said ALD process comprising:

exposing a wafer to a starved dose of a first chemically reactive precursor, said starved dose being selected to yield less than one-half of a maximum saturated ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for said first chemically reactive precursor, wherein said first chemically reactive precursor is a soft saturating precursor characterized by an onset of a slow increase in ALD growth rate with further increases of precursor exposure dose and having a longer saturation time as compared to a second chemically reactive precursor to follow the first chemically reactive precursor, and the exposure to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor determines a value of a starved saturation ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for a second chemically reactive precursor to follow the first chemically reactive precursor: and

exposing the wafer to a dose of the second chemically reactive precursor, the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor selected for achieving starved saturation of the second chemically reactive precursor under variations in dose of the second chemically reactive precursor, said starved saturation characterized by an ALD growth rate measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, of the second chemically reactive precursor being less than half of a maximum saturated ALD growth rate, measured in film thickness per ALD process cycle, for the second precursor,

wherein:

said starved dose of said first chemically reactive precursor and the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor are selected to obtain a maximum starved ALD process film deposition rate as measured in film thickness per unit time for the first and second chemically reactive precursors, and

said first and second chemically reactive precursors are delivered sequentially in time, and one of the first and second chemically reactive precursor doses comprises water (H 2 O) and the other comprises Trimethylaluminum (TMA).

11. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein one or both of the first and/or second chemically reactive precursor doses is applied for a time between approximately 0.02 sec to approximately 0.5 sec.

12. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor is delivered substantially uniformly over the wafer.

13. The ALD process of claim 10 , further comprising repeatedly exposing the wafer to the first and second chemically reactive precursor doses to form a material film on the wafer.

14. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein a non-uniformity of a thickness of a resulting film is within +/−1.5%, 1 sigma.

15. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein the first and second chemically reactive precursors are delivered substantially uniformly via a showerhead or distribution plate.

16. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein a purge follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor, but no purge follows exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

17. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein exposure of the wafer to the second chemically reactive precursor follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor without a purge, and a purge is used following exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

18. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein purges follow exposure of the wafer to both the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor, and the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

19. The ALD process of claim 10 , wherein exposure of the wafer to the second chemically reactive precursor follows exposure of the wafer to the starved dose of the first chemically reactive precursor without a purge, and no purge is used following exposure of the wafer to the dose of the second chemically reactive precursor.

Assignments (5)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 13, 2018
From: EUGENE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: EUGENUS, INC.
Reel/Frame 045963/0870 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2018
From: AIXTRON, INC.
To: EUGENE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 044767/0357 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 30, 2018
From: EUGENE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: EUGENUS, INC.
Reel/Frame 045444/0996 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 6, 2011
From: GENUS, INC.
To: AIXTRON, INC.
Reel/Frame 026397/0117 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2004
From: KIM, GI YOUL; SRIVASTAVA, ANURANJAN; SEIDEL, THOMAS E.; LONDERGAN, ANA R.; RAMANATHAN, SASANGAN
To: GENUS, INC.
Reel/Frame 015846/0884 →