IP Library Granted Patent US 7,061,787
Granted Patent B2
US 7,061,787 · App. 10/835,623 · Granted Jun 13, 2006

Field ramp down for pinned synthetic antiferromagnet

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,061,787
App. No.
10/835,623
Granted
Jun 13, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques for processing magnetic devices are provided. In one aspect, a method of processing a magnetic device including two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises the following steps. A magnetic field is applied in a given direction to orient a direction of magnetization of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers. The direction of the applied magnetic field is rotated in relation to a positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers to counteract at least a portion of a change in a direction of magnetization experienced by at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers when the applied magnetic field is reduced.

Claims (24)

1. A method of processing a magnetic device comprising two or more anti-parallel coupled layers, the method comprising the steps of:

applying a magnetic field in a given direction to orient a direction of magnetization of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers; and

rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to a positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers to counteract at least a portion of a change in a direction of magnetization experienced by at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers when the applied magnetic field is reduced.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the magnetic device further comprises at least one anti-ferromagnetic layer.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one anti-ferromagnetic layer is used to orient the direction of magnetization of at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers present in the at least one free layer.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein a direction of magnetization of the at least one anti-ferromagnetic layer is substantially the same as the direction of the applied magnetic field.

5. The method of claim 2 , further comprising the step of heating the device to greater than or equal to a temperature wherein an exchange bias between at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers and the at least one anti-ferromagnetic layer vanishes.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the device is heated at a temperature of from about 250° C. to about 300° C. for a duration of from about one hour to about five hours.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprise a ferromagnet.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises multiple layers.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein at least one of multiple layers comprises a ferromagnetic layer.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein at least one of multiple layers comprises an anti-ferromagnetic layer.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the applied magnetic field is reduced to zero.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers are coupled by one or more spacer layers therebetween.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the change in the direction of magnetization experienced by the at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises an angular excursion.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers reduces an amount of change in the direction of magnetization experienced by the at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers by greater than or equal to about 50 percent.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers reduces an amount of change in the direction of magnetization experienced by the at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers by greater than or equal to about 75 percent.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers substantially eliminates the change in the direction of magnetization experienced by the at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises changing the direction of the applied magnetic field while maintaining the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises rotating the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers while maintaining the direction of the applied magnetic field.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers comprises both changing the direction of the applied magnetic field and rotating the positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers.

20. A magnetic device comprising two or more anti-parallel coupled layers, the magnetic device being formed comprising the steps of:

applying a magnetic field in a given direction to orient a direction of magnetization of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers; and

rotating the direction of the applied magnetic field in relation to a positioning of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers to counteract at least a portion of a change in a direction of magnetization experienced by at least one of the two or more anti-parallel coupled layers when the applied magnetic field is reduced.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2015
From: QIMONDA AG
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 035623/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2010
From: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
To: QIMONDA AG
Reel/Frame 023788/0535 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2005
From: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 016275/0343 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Nov 26, 2004
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES (IBM) CORPORATION
To: DARPA
Reel/Frame 016018/0175 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2004
From: KLOSTERMANN, ULRICH
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Reel/Frame 015103/0030 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2004
From: TROUILLOUD, PHILIP L.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015103/0084 →