IP Library Granted Patent US 7,908,064
Granted Patent B2
US 7,908,064 · App. 11/607,726 · Granted Mar 15, 2011

Optimal selection of input torque considering battery utilization for a hybrid electric vehicle

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,908,064
App. No.
11/607,726
Granted
Mar 15, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A preferred input torque for a hybrid powertrain is determined within a solution space of feasible input torques in accordance with a plurality of powertrain system constraints that results in a minimum overall powertrain system loss. System power losses and battery utilization costs are calculated at feasible input torques and a solution for the input torque corresponding to the minimum total powertrain system loss is converged upon to determine the preferred input torque.

Claims (32)

1. Method for determining a preferred input torque for operating an electrically variable transmission (EVT) including an input, an output and an electric machine having known coupling relationships, and an energy storage system (ESS), comprising:

determining current EVT operating conditions including input, output and electric machine speeds;

determining system constraints in electric machine torque, ESS power and input torque at current EVT operating conditions;

providing a target output torque producible within said system constraints;

calculating aggregate system power losses corresponding to feasible input torques that can produce the target output torque within said system constraints;

calculating ESS power utilization costs as a function of ESS power corresponding to feasible input torques, wherein the ESS power utilization costs are adapted for application to the aggregate system power losses;

applying the ESS power utilization costs to the aggregate system power losses to determine total system losses corresponding to feasible input torques that can produce the target output torque within said system constraints;

converging upon a feasible input torque corresponding to a substantially minimum total system loss; and

selecting as the preferred input torque the feasible input torque corresponding to the substantially minimum total system loss.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating aggregate system power losses comprises:

calculating individual sub-system power losses; and

summing the individual sub-system power losses.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein individual sub-system power losses are selected from the group consisting of an input source power loss, an electric machine power loss and an accessory power loss.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the ESS power utilization cost is also a function of at least one ESS parameter.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one ESS parameter comprises a state of charge of the ESS, an amp-hour throughput of the ESS and ESS power.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein calculating ESS power utilization costs as a function of the ESS power further comprises:

determining a value of at least one ESS parameter; and

determining the ESS power utilization costs as a function of ESS power and the at least one ESS parameter.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the at least one ESS parameter comprises a state of charge of the ESS and an amp-hour throughput of the ESS.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the ESS power utilization costs as a function of the ESS power and the at least one ESS parameter, further comprises:

determining an ESS cost factor as a function of the state of charge and the amp-hour throughput; and

multiplying the ESS cost factor by the ESS power corresponding to feasible input torques to obtain the ESS power utilization costs.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

shifting the ESS power by a shift value to a shifted ESS power, wherein the shift value is a function of the state of charge, and wherein multiplying the ESS power by the ESS cost factor utilizes the shifted ESS power.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the shift value is a function of the state of charge such that at low states of charge the total system power loss is biased in a manner to effect reduced ESS power and at high states of charge the total system loss is biased in a manner to effect increased ESS power.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said applying the ESS costs to the aggregate power losses to determine total system losses corresponding to feasible input torques that can produce the target output torque within said system constraints, further comprises:

adding the ESS power utilization costs to the aggregate system power losses to determine the total system losses.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein said preferred input torque is periodically updated, and further wherein such periodic update proceeds during quiescent powertrain operation only when the most recently selected feasible input torque corresponds to a respective substantially minimum total system loss that is at least a predetermined amount less than the respective substantially minimum total system loss corresponding to the previously selected feasible input torque.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein converging upon a feasible input torque comprises performing a section search in feasible input torques and corresponding total system losses.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein said section search comprises a golden section ratio.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein converging upon a feasible input torque comprises performing an iterative derivative convergence.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein converging upon a feasible input torque comprises performing polynomial estimations.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034184/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025327/0041 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025314/0946 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0656 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0140 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0264 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0663 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0563 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0540 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0610 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2009
From: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022117/0047 →