IP Library Granted Patent US 7,332,251
Granted Patent B2
US 7,332,251 · App. 11/617,432 · Granted Feb 19, 2008

Pattern decomposition and optical proximity correction method for double exposure when forming photomasks

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,332,251
App. No.
11/617,432
Granted
Feb 19, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A pattern decomposition and optical proximity correction method for double exposure comprises defining second exposure patterns by performing a logical operation on target patterns and first exposure patterns, comparing the first and second exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logical operation on the first and second exposure patterns, performing optical proximity correction on the first exposure patterns to form fourth exposure patterns, performing the optical proximity correction on the second exposure patterns to form fifth exposure patterns, and comparing the fourth and fifth exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logical operation on the fourth and fifth exposure patterns.

Claims (46)

1. A pattern decomposition and optical proximity correction method for double exposure when forming photomasks, comprising:

defining first exposure patterns by separating patterns requiring the double exposure from target patterns depending on the resolution of an exposing apparatus;

defining second exposure patterns by performing a logic operation on the target patterns and the first exposure patterns;

comparing the first and second exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logic operation on the first and second exposure patterns;

performing optical proximity correction on the first exposure patterns to form fourth exposure patterns;

performing optical proximity correction on the second exposure patterns to form fifth exposure patterns; and

comparing the fourth and fifth exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logic operation on the fourth and fifth exposure patterns.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein defining the first exposure pattern comprises:

identifying fine patterns having a pitch smaller than the resolution of the exposing apparatus;

selecting a predetermined pattern among the identified fine patterns; and

selecting other patterns that are separated at least a predetermined distance from the predetermined pattern to define the first exposure patterns.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the other patterns selected as the first exposure patterns are separated from each other by a distance of at least four times the width of each of the other patterns.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein defining the second exposure patterns comprises performing a logical disjunction (OR) operation on the target patterns and the first exposure patterns.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the first and second exposure patterns with the target patterns comprises:

performing a logical exclusive disjunction (XOR) operation on the first and second exposure patterns to form third exposure patterns; and

comparing the third exposure patterns with the target patterns.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optical proximity correction on the second exposure patterns is performed in consideration of overlap between the second exposure patterns and the fourth exposure patterns.

7. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising:

performing contour simulation on the fourth exposure patterns between formation of the fourth exposure patterns and formation of the fifth exposure patterns.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the fourth and fifth exposure patterns with the target patterns comprises:

performing a logical exclusive disjunction (XOR) operation on the fourth and fifth exposure patterns to form sixth exposure patterns; and

confirming whether or not the sixth exposure patterns are within an allowable range of error by comparing the sixth exposure patterns with the target patterns.

9. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising:

performing contour simulation on each of the fourth and fifth exposure patterns before performing the logical exclusive disjunction (XOR) operation on the fourth and fifth exposure patterns.

10. A pattern decomposition and optical proximity correction method for double exposure when forming photomasks, comprising:

defining first exposure patterns by separating patterns requiring the double exposure from target patterns depending on the resolution of an exposing apparatus;

defining second exposure patterns by performing a logical operation on the target patterns and the first exposure patterns;

comparing the first and second exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logical operation on the first and second exposure patterns;

performing optical proximity correction on the first exposure patterns to form fourth exposure patterns;

performing contour simulation on the fourth exposure patterns;

merging the second exposure patterns with the fourth contour-simulated exposure patterns to form merged patterns;

performing the optical proximity correction on the second exposure patterns to form fifth exposure patterns in consideration of overlap between the second exposure patterns and the merged patterns;

performing the contour simulation on the fifth exposure patterns; and

comparing the fourth and fifth exposure patterns with the target patterns by performing a logical operation on the fourth and fifth contour-simulated exposure patterns.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein defining the first exposure patterns comprises:

identifying fine patterns having a pitch smaller than the resolution of the exposing apparatus;

selecting a predetermined pattern among the identified fine patterns; and

selecting other patterns separated at least a predetermined distance from the predetermined pattern to define the first exposure patterns.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the other patterns selected as the first exposure patterns are separated from each other by a distance of at least four times the width of each of the other patterns.

13. The method according to claim 10 , wherein defining the second exposure patterns comprises performing a logical disjunction (OR) operation on the target patterns and the first exposure patterns.

14. The method according to claim 10 , wherein comparing the first and second exposure patterns with the target patterns comprises:

performing a logical exclusive disjunction (XOR) operation on the first and second exposure patterns to form third exposure patterns; and

comparing the third exposure patterns with the target patterns.

15. The method according to claim 10 , wherein comparing the fourth and fifth exposure patterns with the target patterns comprises:

performing a logical exclusive disjunction (XOR) operation on the fourth and fifth exposure patterns to form sixth exposure patterns; and

confirming whether or not the sixth exposure patterns are within an allowable range of error by comparing the sixth exposure patterns with the target patterns.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE IS HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. NOT HYNIX-SEMICONDUCTOR INC. THERE IS NO HYPHEN IN THE NAME. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 67328 FRAME 814. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded May 14, 2024
From: HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
To: SK HYNIX INC.
Reel/Frame 067412/0482 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2024
From: SK HYNIX INC.
To: MIMIRIP LLC
Reel/Frame 067369/0832 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 6, 2024
From: HYNIX-SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
To: SK HYNIX INC.
Reel/Frame 067328/0814 →