IP Library Granted Patent US 8,295,474
Granted Patent B2
US 8,295,474 · App. 12/188,819 · Granted Oct 23, 2012

Echo canceller with heavy double-talk estimation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,295,474
App. No.
12/188,819
Granted
Oct 23, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a data processing system, a method includes receiving samples of a send path input signal (Sin) and samples of a receive path input signal (Rin); in response to receiving each sample of the send path input signal, providing a double-talk indicator to indicate whether or not double-talk has been detected; using the double-talk indicator to determine a double-talk density within a predetermined number of samples of the send path input signal or the receive path input signal; and using the double-talk density to provide a heavy double-talk indicator which indicates whether or not heavy double-talk has been detected. In response to the heavy double-talk indicator indicating that heavy double-talk has been detected, a heavy double-talk mode may be entered.

Claims (50)

1. In a data processing system, a method comprising:

receiving samples of a send path input signal (Sin) and samples of a receive path input signal (Rin);

in response to receiving each sample of the send path input signal, providing a double-talk indicator to indicate whether or not double-talk has been detected;

using the double-talk indicator to determine a double-talk density within a predetermined number of samples of the send path input signal or the receive path input signal; and

using the double-talk density to set a heavy double-talk indicator to indicate whether or not heavy double-talk has been detected and to determine a mode of the data processing system, wherein:

in response to determining that the double-talk density is between a first density threshold and a second density threshold, wherein the first density threshold is greater than the second density threshold, setting the heavy double-talk indicator to indicate that heavy double-talk has not been detected and entering the data processing system into a double-talk mode, and

in response to entering the double-talk mode, disabling non-linear processing for a first duration; and

in response to determining that the double-talk density exceeds the first density threshold, setting the heavy double-talk indicator to indicate that heavy double-talk has been detected and entering the data processing system into a heavy double-talk mode, and

in response to entering the heavy double-talk mode, disabling nonlinear processing for a second duration, wherein the first duration is different than the second duration.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the double-talk density indicates a number of samples within the predetermined number of samples for which double-talk was detected relative to the predetermined number of samples.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined number of samples is defined by a window, the method further comprising:

sliding the window to indicate a next predetermined number of samples.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the sliding the window comprises sliding the window by one sample of the send path input signal or the input path input signal to indicate the next predetermined number of samples.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

exiting heavy double-talk mode only after at least the second duration has expired.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the exiting the heavy double-talk mode comprises exiting the heavy double-talk mode when the double-talk density is below the second threshold and the second duration has expired.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

using the send path input signal and the receive path output signal to generate an error signal; and

when in the heavy double-talk mode, disabling nonlinear processing of the error signal.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

when not in the heavy double-talk mode and when the double-talk indicator indicates that no double-talk has been detected, performing nonlinear processing of the error signal; and

when in the heavy double-talk mode, continuing to disable nonlinear processing of the error signal even when the double-talk indicator indicates that no double-talk has been detected.

9. In a data processing system, a method comprising:

receiving a send path input signal (Sin) and a receive path input signal (Rin);

using the send path input signal and the receive path input signal to generate an error signal;

using a double-talk density to indicate the presence of heavy double-talk and to determine a mode of the data processing system;

entering the data processing system into a double-talk mode when determining that the double-talk density is between a first density threshold and a second density threshold;

entering the data processing system into a heavy double-talk mode when determining that the double-talk density exceeds the first density threshold, the first density threshold being greater than the second density threshold;

when not in heavy double-talk mode and when no double talk is present, performing non-linear processing of the error signal, wherein non-linear processing comprises a plurality of processing functions;

when in double-talk mode, disabling at least one of the processing functions for a first duration; and

when in heavy double-talk mode, disabling the at least one of the plurality of processing functions for a second duration regardless of whether double-talk is present or not, the first duration is different than the second duration.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the using the double-talk density to selectively enter heavy double-talk mode comprises:

determining the double-talk density over a predetermined number of samples of the send path input signal or the receive path input signal.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the double-talk density indicates a number of samples within the predetermined number of samples for which double-talk was present relative to the predetermined number of samples.

12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

exiting heavy double-talk mode when the double-talk density falls below the second density threshold.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, when not in heavy double-talk mode:

performing nonlinear processing of the error signal when double-talk is not present.

14. A data processing system, comprising:

a first input which receives samples of a send path input signal;

a second input which receives samples of a receive path input signal;

a double-talk detector which receives the send path input signal and the receive path input signal, and, in response to each sample of the send path input signal, provides a double-talk indicator to indicate whether or not double-talk has been detected; and

a heavy double-talk estimator which uses the double-talk indicator to determine a double-talk density and uses the double-talk density to provide a heavy double-talk indicator which indicates whether or not heavy double-talk has been detected and to determine a mode of the data processing system, wherein:

the data processing system enters into a double-talk mode when determining that the double-talk density is between a first density threshold and a second density threshold and nonlinear processing is disabled for a first duration when double-talk has been detected; and

the data processing system enters into a heavy double-talk mode when determining that the double-talk density exceeds the first density threshold and nonlinear processing is disabled for a second duration when the heavy double-talk mode has been entered, further wherein the first duration is greater than the second duration.

15. The data processing system of claim 14 , further comprising:

an adaptive filter which receives the receive path input signal and provides a filtered output;

a nonlinear processing unit which receives an error signal generated using the send path input signal and the filtered output, the nonlinear processing unit, when not in heavy double-talk mode and when the double-talk indicator indicates that double talk is not present, performing nonlinear processing of the error signal, and, when in heavy double-talk mode, the nonlinear processing unit disabled from performing nonlinear processing of the error signal, regardless of whether double-talk is present or not.

16. The data processing system of claim 14 , wherein the heavy double-talk estimator provides the heavy double-talk indicator to indicate exit from heavy double-talk mode when the double-talk density falls below the second density threshold and at least a predetermined heavy double-talk mode duration has expired.

17. The data processing system of claim 14 , wherein the double-talk density is determined over a predetermined number of samples of the send path input signal or the receive path input signal, and wherein the double-talk density indicates a number of samples within the predetermined number of samples for which double-talk was present relative to the predetermined number of samples.

Assignments (20)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Feb 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V. F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 052917/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 052915/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Dec 10, 2019
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 053547/0421 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 050744/0097 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO. FROM 13,883,290 TO 13,833,290 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041703 FRAME 0536. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS.. Recorded Feb 20, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 048734/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 040632 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
To: NXP USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 044209/0047 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE PATENTS 8108266 AND 8062324 AND REPLACE THEM WITH 6108266 AND 8060324 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037518 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 041703/0536 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 8, 2016
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: NXP USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 040632/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 040928/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V., F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 040925/0001 →
SUPPLEMENT TO THE SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 16, 2016
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 039138/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037518/0292 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 12, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037486/0517 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037354/0757 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0553 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 6, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031591/0266 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 18, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030633/0424 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 13, 2010
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024397/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 9, 2008
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 021936/0772 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2008
From: DYBA, ROMAN A.; DENG, HONGYANG; ZWERNEMANN, BRAD L.
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 021363/0591 →