IP Library Granted Patent US 8,131,947
Granted Patent B2
US 8,131,947 · App. 12/201,216 · Granted Mar 6, 2012

Cache snoop limiting within a multiple master data processing system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,131,947
App. No.
12/201,216
Granted
Mar 6, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a data processing system, access to a cache in response to access requests from first processing circuitry and snoop requests resulting from a transaction performed by second processing circuitry are arbitrated. Accesses to the cache are monitored to determine if the first processing circuitry is prevented from accessing the cache for more than a threshold amount of time. A signal is generated to indicate when the first processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for more than the threshold amount of time.

Claims (34)

1. A method comprising:

arbitrating access to a cache between access requests from first processing circuitry and snoop requests resulting from a transaction performed by second processing circuitry;

monitoring accesses to the cache to determine if the first processing circuitry is prevented from accessing the cache for more than a threshold amount of time; and

generating a signal to indicate when the first processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for more than the threshold amount of time.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

generating the signal in response to determining that the first processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for a predetermined number of data processing cycles.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising:

generating the signal also in response to determining that the first processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for at least the predetermined number of data processing cycles over a predetermined time period.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising:

dynamically altering the predetermined number of data processing cycles in response to system activity within a data processing system comprising the cache, first processing circuitry and second processing circuitry.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

generating the signal also in response to determining that the first processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for at least a predetermined number of data processing cycles over a predetermined time period.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising:

dynamically altering the predetermined number of data processing cycles for use in a second time period subsequent to the predetermined time period in response to a previous value of a number of data processing cycles that the first processing circuitry is prevented from accessing the cache during the predetermined time period.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

in response to generating the signal, preventing snoop requests to the cache for a predetermined amount of time.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

in response to generating the signal, limiting snoop requests to a predetermined amount of time during a timeframe of predetermined duration subsequent to generating the signal.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

generating a second signal for indicating when the second processing circuitry has been prevented from accessing the cache for more than the threshold amount of time.

10. A system comprising:

a first master and a second master coupled via a system interconnect, the first master comprising:

a cache memory;

first processing circuitry coupled to the cache memory; and

an arbiter coupled to the first processing circuitry and the cache memory, the arbiter arbitrating access to the cache memory between access requests from the first master and snoop requests resulting from a transaction performed by the second master, the arbiter generating a signal to indicate when the first master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory;

the system further comprising:

coherency logic coupled to the first master and the second master, the coherency logic using the signal to indicate when the first master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory for more than a predetermined amount of time.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the coherency logic uses the signal to determine that the first master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory for a predetermined number of data processing cycles.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the coherency logic uses the signal also to determine that the first master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory for at least a predetermined number of data processing cycles over a predetermined time period.

13. The system of claim 11 wherein the coherency logic dynamically alters the predetermined number of data processing cycles in response to system activity within the system.

14. The system of claim 11 wherein the coherency logic uses the signal to determine that the first master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory for at least a predetermined number of data processing cycles over a predetermined time period.

15. The system of claim 11 wherein the coherency logic dynamically alters the predetermined number of data processing cycles for use in a second time period subsequent to the predetermined time period in response to a previous value of the predetermined number of data processing cycles.

16. The system of claim 11 wherein the coherency logic prevents snoop requests from the second master to the cache memory for a predetermined amount of time in response to receiving the signal.

17. The system of claim 11 wherein the second master generates a second signal for indicating when the second master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory, the cache memory limiting cache accesses from the first master when the second master has been prevented from accessing the cache memory for more than a second predetermined amount of time.

Assignments (17)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2023
From: NXP USA, INC.
To: EIREOG INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 065880/0480 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Feb 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V. F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 052917/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jan 17, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 052915/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Dec 10, 2019
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 053547/0421 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 050744/0097 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO. FROM 13,883,290 TO 13,833,290 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041703 FRAME 0536. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS.. Recorded Feb 20, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 048734/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 040632 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
To: NXP USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 044209/0047 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE PATENTS 8108266 AND 8062324 AND REPLACE THEM WITH 6108266 AND 8060324 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037518 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 041703/0536 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 8, 2016
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: NXP USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 040632/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 040928/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP, B.V., F/K/A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 040925/0001 →
SUPPLEMENT TO THE SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 16, 2016
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 039138/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037518/0292 →
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 12, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 037486/0517 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037354/0757 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 21, 2015
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Reel/Frame 037356/0553 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 6, 2013
From: FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 031591/0266 →