System and method for processing formatted text documents in a database
A system and method for automatically determining a plurality of pieces of different information about a textual document from the text of the textual document are provided in which one or more particular characteristics of the text of the textual document are identified to generate a file containing the text of the textual document with the particular characteristics marked up within the text. In addition, any negative treatment of other textual documents from the text of the textual document is determined to generate negative treatment information, a data record is produced indicating a depth of treatment for each other textual documents cited in the text of the textual document, the source of a quotation in the text of the textual document is verified to generate verified quotation information, any subject matter text that is applicable to the text of the textual document is determined to generate subject matter headings associated with the text of the textual document, and a data record is generated containing the identified characteristics of the textual document, the negative treatment of other textual documents cited in the textual document, the depth of treatment of other textual documents cited in the textual document, the verified quotation information, and the subject matter text associated with the textual document so that all of the information is accessible.
1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
identifying by a computer processor a case law citation;
searching electronically stored legal cases to identify instances where legal cases contain citation to the identified case law citation;
determining by a computer processor if one or more of the identified citation instances provides a negative legal depth-of-treatment regarding the identified case law citation; and
generating a legal depth-of-treatment symbol to be displayed on a user computer indicative that the identified case law citation has negative legal depth-of-treatment.
2. A computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol is a colored symbol.
3. A computer implemented method as recited in claim 2 wherein the colored symbol is a flag symbol.
4. A computer implemented method as recited in claim 1 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol includes identification of a legal case providing negative legal depth-of-treatment for the identified case law citation.
5. A computer implemented method as recited in claim 4 wherein user selection of a legal depth-of-treatment symbol on said user computer identifies at least a portion of the identified legal case associated with the user selected legal depth-of-treatment symbol.
6. An apparatus comprising:
a memory;
a processor disposed in communication with said memory, and configured to issue a plurality of instructions stored in the memory, wherein the instructions cause the processor to:
identify occurrences of a piece of text having a predetermined format an electronically stored textual document;
determine a legal depth-of-treatment for at least one piece of identified formatted text in the textual document to determine a significance of the at least one piece of formatted text based on predetermined criteria; and
determine a legal depth of symbol indicative of the determined legal depth-of-treatment for the at least one piece of formatted text in the electronically stored textual document.
7. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the determined legal depth-of-treatment for the at least one piece of identified formatted text is negative legal depth-of-treatment relative to case law associated with the at least one piece of identified formatted text.
8. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the instructions further cause the processor to associate an abstract with each piece of formatted text in the textual document.
9. An apparatus as recited in claim 8 wherein the instructions further cause the processor to generate a data record containing each identified piece of formatted text from the textual document, the depth-of-treatment value and the abstract associated with each piece of formatted text in the textual document.
10. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the predetermined criteria for determining the significance of the piece of formatted text includes a number of occurrences the piece of formatted text appeared in the textual document.
11. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the predetermined criteria for determining the significance of the piece of formatted text includes a citation type associated with the piece of formatted text.
12. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the predetermined criteria for determining the significance of the piece of formatted text includes a page number for a legal case on which the piece of formatted text appears.
13. An apparatus as recited in claim 6 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol is a colored symbol.
14. A computer implemented method as recited in claim 13 wherein the colored symbol is a flag symbol.
15. An apparatus comprising:
a memory;
a processor disposed in communication with said memory, and configured to issue a plurality of instructions stored in the memory, wherein the instructions cause the processor to:
identify by a computer processor a case law citation in a textual document;
search electronically stored legal cases to identify instances where legal cases contain citation to the identified case law citation;
determine if one or more of the identified citation instances provides a negative legal depth-of-treatment regarding the identified case law citation; and
generate a legal depth-of-treatment symbol to be displayed on a user computer indicative that the identified case law citation has negative legal depth-of-treatment.
16. An apparatus as recited in claim 15 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol is a colored symbol.
17. An apparatus as recited in claim 16 wherein the colored symbol is a flag symbol.
18. An apparatus as recited in claim 15 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol includes identification of a legal case providing negative legal depth-of-treatment for the identified case law citation.
19. An apparatus as recited in claim 18 wherein user selection of a legal depth-of-treatment symbol on said user computer identifies at least a portion of the identified legal case associated with the user selected legal depth-of-treatment symbol.