IP Library Granted Patent US 7,956,630
Granted Patent B1
US 7,956,630 · App. 12/766,744 · Granted Jun 7, 2011

Real-time effective-wavelength error correction for HDVSI

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,956,630
App. No.
12/766,744
Granted
Jun 7, 2011
Kind
B1
Abstract

An error correction for effective-wavelength variations is implemented by adjusting the filter parameters of the quadrature demodulation algorithm of a high definition vertical scanning process using a phase step that accounts for phase-step changes associated with variations in the effective wavelength irradiating the sample when the surface is curved. The nominal phase step is replaced in the filter with an actual phase step size that includes a phase parameter generated for each pixel by calibration or modeling of a specific type of surface. This substitution eliminates all errors produced by surface-dependent variations in the effective wavelength of the irradiating light.

Claims (37)

1. A method for producing a height map of a sample with correction of errors produced by variations in an effective wavelength illuminating the sample, the method comprising the following steps:

producing a plurality of signals from a fringe pattern; and

calculating the map of the sample by application of a quadrature-demodulation technique on said signals;

wherein said quadrature-demodulation technique utilizes a filter with a phase parameter equal to an empirical value added to a nominal phase step used to produce said plurality of signals; and

wherein said empirical value is a measure of a phase error produced by a variation of said effective wavelength illuminating the sample.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said empirical value is obtained by a calibration process whereby a spectral amplitude of a correlogram produced at each pixel by said plurality of signals is calculated using a quadrature-demodulation method.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said empirical value is obtained with a parameterized model fitted empirically to said sample.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein said sample has a surface corresponding substantially to a spherical section, and said parameterized model is represented by

δ xy =αr β ,

where r is a distance between a pixel x,y and a center pixel x 0 ,y 0 on said surface, and α and β are empirical parameters.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said correction of errors is carried out in real time during said calculating step.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said signals are interference signals.

7. A method for producing a height map of a sample with correction of errors produced by variations in an effective wavelength illuminating the sample, the method comprising the following steps:

producing a plurality of signals from a fringe pattern;

calculating a coarse map of the sample by application of a coherence-peak sensing technique on said signals;

calculating a fine map of the sample by application of a quadrature-demodulation technique on said signals; and

combining the coarse map and the fine map to produce a high-definition map of the sample;

wherein said quadrature-demodulation technique utilizes a filter with a phase parameter equal to an empirical value added to a nominal phase step used to produce said plurality of signals; and

wherein said empirical value is a measure of a phase error produced by a variation of said effective wavelength illuminating the sample.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said empirical value is obtained by a calibration process whereby a spectral amplitude of a correlogram produced at each pixel by said plurality of signals is calculated using a quadrature-demodulation method.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein said empirical value is obtained with a parameterized model fitted empirically to said sample.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein said sample has a surface corresponding substantially to a spherical section, and said parameterized model is represented by

δ xy =αr β ,

where r is a distance between a pixel x,y and a center pixel x 0 ,y 0 on said surface, and α and β are empirical parameters.

11. The method of claim 7 , wherein said correction of errors is carried out in real time during said calculating step.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein said signals are interference signals.

13. Interferometric apparatus for producing a height map of a sample surface with correction of errors produced by variations in an effective wavelength illuminating the sample, the apparatus comprising:

means for producing a plurality of interference signals; and

means for calculating the map of the sample by application of a quadrature-demodulation technique on said interference signals;

wherein said quadrature-demodulation technique utilizes a filter with a phase parameter equal to an empirical value added to a nominal phase step used to produce said plurality of interference signals; and

wherein said empirical value is a measure of a phase error produced by a variation of said effective wavelength illuminating the sample.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein said empirical value is obtained by a calibration process whereby a spectral amplitude of a correlogram produced at each pixel by said plurality of interference signals is calculated using a quadrature-demodulation method.

15. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein said empirical value is obtained with a parameterized model fitted empirically to said sample.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein said sample has a surface corresponding substantially to a spherical section, and said parameterized model is represented by

δ xy =αr β ,

where r is a distance between a pixel x,y and a center pixel x 0 ,y 0 on said surface, and α and β are empirical parameters.

17. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein said correction of errors is carried out in real time during said calculating step.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 11, 2012
From: VEECO METROLOGY INC.
To: BRUKER NANO INC.
Reel/Frame 028350/0420 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2010
From: VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
To: VEECO METROLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 025051/0290 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2010
From: CHEN, DONG
To: VEECO INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 024282/0925 →