IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,551,938
Granted Patent B2
US 9,551,938 · App. 13/366,829 · Granted Jan 24, 2017

Light source optimizing method, exposure method, device manufacturing method, program, exposure apparatus, lithography system, light source evaluation method, and light source modulation method

Inventors: Tomoyuki Matsuyama (Kitakatsushika-gun, JP); Naonori Kita (Saitama, JP)
Assignee: NIKON CORPORATION
G03F7/70116G03F7/705G03F7/70125G03F7/70625
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,551,938
App. No.
13/366,829
Granted
Jan 24, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a light source optimizing method wherein: a light source shape obtained as the result of SMO is set as a target, the SMO being an optimizing calculation method for optimizing a mask pattern and illumination light source, a spatial light modulator is controlled such that a deviation from the target is within an acceptable range, and the shape of the illumination light source is set; the image of the pattern obtained as the results of the SMO is formed on a wafer, using illumination light emitted from the illumination light source having the set light source shape, an OPE is evaluated as image-forming performance using the detection results obtained by detecting the image of the pattern thus formed; and the light source shape is optimized.

Claims (87)

1. An adjustment device used in an exposure apparatus that makes a light from a light source be distributed in an illumination pupil, illuminates a pattern with the light via the illumination pupil and exposes an object with an image of the pattern that has been illuminated, the device comprising:

a memory in which instructions are stored; and

a controller configured to execute the instructions stored in the memory causing the controller to execute:

expressing, by using a polynomial, a distribution of difference between a pupil intensity distribution in the illumination pupil and a target pupil intensity distribution serving as a target; and

calculating, by using a variation of an image-forming state measured after forming the image of the pattern on the object, a coefficient of each term of the polynomial such that the image-forming state falls within a predetermined acceptable range, wherein

the controller outputs an instruction for adjusting the pupil intensity distribution by using the coefficient obtained by the calculating.

2. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the controller executes the expressing and the calculating, with the adjusted pupil intensity distribution serving as the pupil intensity distribution.

3. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a polynomial in which a position in the illumination pupil is used as a variable.

4. The adjustment device according to claim 3 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a transmittance modulation function T(ξ,η)≡exp[Σ i Z i f i (ξ,η)] defined using a Fringe Zernike polynomial f i (ξη) related to a position ξ,η in the illumination pupil and an expansion coefficient Z i , of each order of the Fringe Zernike polynomial.

5. The adjustment device according to claim 3 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a distortion polynomial ξ′=Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dξ},η′=Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dη}.

6. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

in the calculating, a least-squares method is used.

7. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an error of a line width of the image of the pattern.

8. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an Optical Proximity Effect error.

9. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the image-forming state includes a process window.

10. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a Zernike polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

11. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a distortion polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

12. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the polynomial includes a convolution of a blur function that indicates an intensity distribution of blur and the target pupil intensity distribution.

13. The adjustment device according to claim 1 , wherein

the polynomial includes a predetermined index function related to a modulation due to a flare component.

14. A device manufacturing method comprising:

forming a predetermined pattern on a substrate serving as the object, using an exposure apparatus adjusted with the adjustment device according to claim 1 ;

developing the substrate on which the predetermined pattern has been formed and forming a mask layer on a surface of the substrate, the mask layer having a shape corresponding to the predetermined pattern; and

processing the surface of the substrate via the mask layer.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a program that causes a computer to execute at least a part of control of an exposure apparatus, the exposure apparatus making a light from a light source be distributed in an illumination pupil, illuminating a pattern with the light via the illumination pupil and exposing an object with an image of the pattern that has been illuminated, the program causing the computer to execute:

by using a polynomial, expressing a distribution of difference between a pupil intensity distribution in the illumination pupil and a target pupil intensity distribution that serves as a target; and

by using a variation of an image-forming state measured after forming the image of the pattern on the object, calculating a coefficient of each term of the polynomial such that the image-forming state falls within a predetermined acceptable range.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a polynomial in which a position in the illumination pupil is used as a variable.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 16 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a transmittance modulation function T(ξ,η)≡exp[Σ i Z i f i (ξ,η)] defined using a Fringe Zernike polynomial f i (ξ,η) related to a position ξ,η in the illumination pupil and an expansion coefficient Z i of each order of the Fringe Zernike polynomial.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 16 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a distortion polynomial ξ′=Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dξ},η′=Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dη}.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an error of a line width of the image of the pattern.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an Optical Proximity Effect error.

21. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the image-forming state includes a process window.

22. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a Zernike polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

23. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a distortion polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

24. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the polynomial includes a convolution of a blur function that indicates an intensity distribution of blur and the target pupil intensity distribution.

25. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium according to claim 15 , wherein

the polynomial includes a predetermined index function related to a modulation due to a flare component.

26. An exposure apparatus that makes a light from a light source be distributed in an illumination pupil, illuminates a pattern with the light via the illumination pupil and exposes an object with an image of the pattern that has been illuminated, the apparatus comprising:

a first calculation section that, by using a polynomial, expresses a distribution of difference between a pupil intensity distribution in the illumination pupil and a target pupil intensity distribution that serves as a target;

a second calculation section that, by using a variation of an image-forming state measured after forming the image of the pattern on the object, calculates a coefficient of each term of the polynomial such that the image-forming state falls within a predetermined acceptable range; and

an adjustment section that adjusts the pupil intensity distribution, by using the coefficient that has been calculated.

27. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a polynomial in which a position in the illumination pupil is used as a variable.

28. The exposure apparatus according to claim 27 , wherein the polynomial comprises a transmittance modulation function T(ξ,η)≡exp[Σ i Z i f i (ξ,η)] defined using a Fringe Zernike polynomial f i (ξ,η) related to a position ξη in the illumination pupil and an expansion coefficient Z i of each order of the Fringe Zernike polynomial.

29. The exposure apparatus according to claim 27 , wherein

the polynomial comprises a distortion polynomial ξ′=Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dξ},η′ =Σ i Z′ i {D i (ξ,η)·Dη}.

30. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an error of a line width of the image of the pattern.

31. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the image-forming state includes an Optical Proximity Effect error.

32. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the image-forming state includes a process window.

33. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a Zernike polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

34. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the polynomial includes a polynomial that is a distortion polynomial multiplied by the target pupil intensity distribution.

35. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the polynomial includes a convolution of a blur function that indicates an intensity distribution of blur and the target pupil intensity distribution.

36. The exposure apparatus according to claim 26 , wherein

the polynomial includes a predetermined index function related to a modulation due to a flare component.

37. A lithography system that forms a pattern on a substrate, the system comprising:

the exposure apparatus according to claim 26 ; and

a controller that performs at least a part of control of the exposure apparatus.

38. A device manufacturing method comprising:

forming a predetermined pattern on a substrate serving as the object, using the lithography system according to claim 37 ;

developing the substrate on which the predetermined pattern has been formed and forming a mask layer on a surface of the substrate, the mask layer having a shape corresponding to the predetermined pattern; and

processing the surface of the substrate via the mask layer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2012
From: MATSUYAMA, TOMOYUKI; KITA, NAONORI
To: NIKON CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027675/0810 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2010-035476 · Feb 20, 2010 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTJP2011000813 · Feb 14, 2011
Related Publication 20120133915A1 · May 31, 2012