Granted Patent B2

US 9,016,252 · App. 13/873,797 · Granted Apr 28, 2015

Inventors: Austin Robert Zurface (Hastings, MI); Daniel Bennett Trudell (Marshall, MI); Brian Karl VanDeusen (Agusta, MI)

Assignee: Eaton Corporation

F01L1/18F01L1/185F01L1/2405F01L13/0005F01L13/0036F01L2101/00F01L2800/11F01L2820/043

Abstract

Claims (63)

1. A system for diagnosing malfunctions in a variable valve actuation system comprising:

a hydraulic lash adjuster (HLA) having a chamber filled with a fluid;

a rocker arm assembly having a first end adapted to pivot upon the HLA, the rocker arm assembly capable of being in one of a first mode and a second mode,

the rocker arm assembly comprising:

a first arm with a first end;

a second arm with a first end pivotally connected to the first arm;

a latch assembly functioning to secure the first arm to the second arm when latched in a first mode and functioning to allow the first arm to move relative to the second arm when unlatched in a second mode;

a pressure transducer coupled to the HLA chamber adapted to generate a pressure signature signal indicative of fluid pressure in the HLA chamber; and

a control unit coupled to the hydraulic valve and the pressure transducer, adapted to:

receive the pressure signature signal from the pressure transducer; and

determine a malfunction based at least in part upon the pressure signature signal.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

determine a malfunction by comparing a pre-stored pressure signature signals to the generated pressure signature signal.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

compare the pre-stored pressure signature signals to the generated pressure signature signal and identify at least one of:

shifting of a pressure event in time;

changes in a rate of occurrence of events;

sudden unexpected pressure transients; and

an overall change in an amplitude of pressure events.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

have a pre-stored information indicating a desired mode;

identify a current mode from the pressure signature signal;

compare the desired mode to the current mode; and

determine an occurrence of a malfunction if the desired mode does not equal the current mode.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

determine a number of malfunctions over a predetermined time period to determine a malfunction rate.

6. The system of claim 5 wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

determine if the malfunction rate exceeds a predetermined malfunction rate.

7. The system of claim 2 further comprising:

a first cam lobe having a nose point adapted to rotate and drive the first arm;

a second cam lobe having a nose point adapted to rotate and drive the second arm;

wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

sense if a pressure spike occurs at approximately when the nose point of the first cam lobe is in contact with the first arm, indicating that the rocker arm assembly is in the first state.

8. The system of claim 2 further comprising:

a first cam lobe having a nose point adapted to rotate and drive the first arm;

a second cam lobe having a nose point adapted to rotate and drive the second arm;

wherein the control unit is further adapted to:

sense if a pressure spike occurs at approximately when the nose point of the second cam lobe is in contact with the second arm, indicating that the rocker arm assembly is in the second state.

9. A method of diagnosing a malfunction of a variable valve actuation system comprising the steps of:

providing a hydraulic lash adjuster (HLA) having a fluid chamber;

providing a rocker arm assembly that has a first end adapted to pivot upon the HLA, wherein the rocker arm assembly has at least two arms pivotally connected having a hydraulically activated latch that secures the arms together when latched,

generating a pressure signature signal in the fluid chamber of the HLA when the rocker-arm assembly is in operation; and

determining a malfunction based upon the pressure signature signal.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the step of determining a malfunction comprises the step of:

comparing pre-stored pressure signature signals to the generated pressure signature signal to determine the malfunction.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the step of determining a malfunction comprises the steps of:

comparing pre-stored pressure signature signals to the generated pressure signature signal, and identifying from the comparison at least one of:

shifting of a pressure event in time;

changes in a rate of occurrence of events;

sudden unexpected pressure transients; and

an overall decrease in an amplitude of pressure events.

12. The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of:

acquiring pre-stored information indicating a desired state of the rocker arm assembly;

calculating from the generated pressure signature signal a current state of the rocker arm assembly;

comparing the desired state to the current state; and

determining when the desired state does not match the current state.

13. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

determining a number of malfunctions over a pre-determined period of time to calculate a malfunction rate; and

determining when the calculated malfunction rate exceeds a predetermined maximum malfunction rate.

14. The method of claim 10 further comprising the steps of:

calculating a plurality of malfunction rates over time;

determining trends of the malfunction rates; and

if the trend is increasing, estimating when the malfunction rate would reach a predetermined unacceptable malfunction rate.

Assignments (2)

Continuity (16)