IP Library Granted Patent US 9,483,472
Granted Patent B2
US 9,483,472 · App. 14/094,415 · Granted Nov 1, 2016

System and method for processing formatted text documents in a database

Inventors: Forrest Rhoads (North Oaks, MN); Dan Dabney (St. Paul, MN); Bob Haschart (White Bear Lake, MN); Jack G. Conrad (Eagan, MN); Howard Turtle (Jackson, WY); Kinley Larntz (Shoreview, MN); Bokyung Yang-Stephens (St. Paul, MN); Daniel Gannon (St. Paul, MN)
Assignee: Thomson Reuters Global Resources
G06F17/30011G06F17/30728G06Q50/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,483,472
App. No.
14/094,415
Granted
Nov 1, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for automatically determining a plurality of pieces of different information about a textual document from the text of the textual document are provided in which one or more particular characteristics of the text of the textual document are identified to generate a file containing the text of the textual document with the particular characteristics marked up within the text.

Claims (17)

1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising: searching electronically stored legal documents to identify instances where one or more of the stored legal documents contain a predetermined case law citation;

scanning one or more of the stored legal documents containing an identified predetermined case law citation to identify stems of certain words;

analyzing the identified stems of certain words using a plurality of heuristic rules to determine if one or more of the stems of certain words provide a negative legal treatment regarding the predetermined case law citation; and

determining that a negative legal depth-of-treatment symbol is to be displayed on a user computer based on the analysis of the identified citation instances.

2. The non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions as recited in claim 1 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol is a colored symbol.

3. The non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions as recited in claim 2 wherein the colored symbol is a flag symbol.

4. The non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions as recited in claim 1 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol includes identification of a legal case providing negative legal depth-of-treatment for the identified case law citation.

5. The non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions as recited in claim 4 wherein user selection of a legal depth-of-treatment symbol on said user computer identifies at least a portion of the identified legal case associated with the user selected legal depth-of-treatment symbol.

6. A computer-implemented method comprising:

searching electronically stored legal documents to identify instances where one or more of the stored legal documents contain a predetermined case law citation;

scanning, by a computer processor, one or more of the stored legal documents containing an identified predetermined case law citation to identify stems of certain words;

analyzing, by a computer processor, the identified stems of certain words using a plurality of heuristic rules to determine if one or more of the stems of certain words provide a negative legal treatment regarding the predetermined case law citation; and

determining, by a computer processor, that a negative legal depth-of-treatment symbol is to be displayed on a user computer based on the analysis of the identified citation instances.

7. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 6 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol is a colored symbol.

8. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 7 wherein the colored symbol is a flag symbol.

9. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 6 wherein the legal depth-of-treatment symbol includes identification of a legal case providing negative legal depth-of-treatment for the identified case law citation.

10. The computer implemented method as recited in claim 9 wherein user selection of a legal depth-of-treatment symbol on said user computer identifies at least a portion of the identified legal case associated with the user selected legal depth-of-treatment symbol.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2020
From: THOMSON REUTERS GLOBAL RESOURCES UNLIMITED COMPANY
To: THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
Reel/Frame 052062/0094 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 5, 2017
From: THOMSON REUTERS GLOBAL RESOURCES
To: THOMSON REUTERS GLOBAL RESOURCES UNLIMITED COMPANY
Reel/Frame 044299/0982 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2016
From: WEST SERVICES INC.
To: THOMSON REUTERS GLOBAL RESOURCES
Reel/Frame 038994/0038 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2016
From: HASCHART, BOB; CONRAD, JACK; RHOADS, FORREST; DABNEY, DAN; STEPHENS, PO YANG BOKYUNG YANG; LARNTZ, KINLEY; GANNON, DAN; TURTLE, HOWARD
To: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 038730/0326 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2016
From: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION
To: WEST SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 038730/0466 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 12432380 · Apr 29, 2009
Continuation 09746557 · Dec 22, 2000
Continuation 09120170 · Jul 21, 1998
Related Publication 20140180935A1 · Jun 26, 2014