IP Library Granted Patent US 10,052,031
Granted Patent B2
US 10,052,031 · App. 14/180,704 · Granted Aug 21, 2018

Determining functional severity of stenosis

Inventors: Puneet Sharma (Monmouth Junction, NJ); Ali Kamen (Skillman, NJ); Max Schöbinger (Hirschaid, DE); Michael Scheuering (Nürnberg, DE); Dorin Comaniciu (Princeton Junction, NJ)
Assignee: Siemens Healthcare GmbH
A61B5/02007A61B5/7246A61B5/7278A61B6/032A61B6/037A61B6/466A61B6/503A61B6/504A61B6/507A61B6/5217A61B6/5235G06T7/0012A61B5/0035A61B5/742A61B8/06A61B8/463A61B8/466A61B8/565G01R33/56366G06T2207/10104G06T2207/10108G06T2207/30048G06T2207/30101
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,052,031
App. No.
14/180,704
Granted
Aug 21, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining functional severity of a stenosis includes: (a) generating a simulated perfusion map from a calculated blood flow; (b) comparing the simulated perfusion map to a measured perfusion map to identify a degree of mismatch therebetween, the measured perfusion map representing perfusion in a patient; (c) modifying a parameter in a model used in calculating the blood flow when the degree of mismatch meets or exceeds a predefined threshold; (d) computing a hemodynamic quantity from the simulated perfusion map when the degree of mismatch is less than the predefined threshold, the hemodynamic quantity being indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis; and (e) displaying the hemodynamic quantity. Systems for determining functional severity of a stenosis are described.

Claims (53)

1. A computer-implemented method for determining functional severity of a stenosis, the method comprising:

generating, by a processor, a simulated perfusion map where perfusion in the simulated perfusion map is a function of a calculated blood flow and an anatomical model derived from medical imaging data from a patient;

comparing, by the processor, the simulated perfusion map to a measured perfusion map, the measured perfusion map representing perfusion in the patient and obtained by perfusion scanning of the patient;

identifying a degree of mismatch between, the simulated perfusion map and the measured perfusion map based on the comparing;

determining whether the degree of mismatch between the simulated perfusion map and the measured perfusion map exceeds a predefined threshold;

modifying, by the processor, a parameter in the anatomical model or a boundary condition of the anatomical model, the anatomical model used in calculating the blood flow when the degree of mismatch exceeds the predefined threshold;

computing, by the processor, a hemodynamic quantity from the simulated perfusion map when the degree of mismatch is less than the predefined threshold, the hemodynamic quantity being indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis; and

displaying the hemodynamic quantity indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis,

wherein the hemodynamic quantity is a measure of a blood flow velocity, a vessel blood pressure, a blood pressure ratio, a blood flow rate, a fractional flow reserve, a hyperemic stenosis resistance, an index of myocardial resistance, or a combination thereof.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

generating, by the processor, an anatomical model of a coronary vessel and of at least a portion of a myocardium based on medical imaging data acquired from the patient.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the medical imaging data comprises magnetic resonance data, computed tomography data, positron emission tomography data, single photon emission tomography data, ultrasound data, angiographic data, x-ray data, or a combination thereof.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the anatomical model comprises a three-dimensional perfusion map, a two-dimensional polar perfusion map, or a combination thereof.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 further comprising:

partitioning, by the processor, the anatomical model into a plurality of perfusion territories.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein the anatomical model is partitioned into 17 segments.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

applying, by the processor, a boundary condition at a boundary point of the coronary vessel.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 wherein the boundary point comprises an outlet.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 wherein the boundary condition is derived from perfusion data obtained from the measured perfusion map.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 wherein the boundary condition is obtained via allometric scaling.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

performing, by the processor, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) computation to obtain the blood flow and a pressure.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the measured perfusion map is obtained via CT perfusion scanning, MR perfusion scanning, NM perfusion scanning, or a combination thereof.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the measured perfusion map is derived at least in part from single photo emission computed tomography (SPECT) data, positron emission tomography (PET) data, or a combination thereof.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the stenosis comprises a coronary stenosis, a cerebral artery stenosis, or a combination thereof.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the parameter in the model comprises a boundary condition parameter.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the hemodynamic quantity is computed from a blood flow value and/or a pressure value, and wherein the blood flow value and the pressure value are derived from the simulated perfusion map.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the hemodynamic quantity comprises fractional flow reserve (FFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), index of myocardial resistance (IMR), or a combination thereof.

18. A system for determining functional severity of a stenosis, the system comprising:

a medical imaging system for perfusion scanning of a patient;

a processor;

a non-transitory memory coupled to the processor;

first logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to generate a simulated perfusion map where perfusion in the simulated perfusion map is a function of a calculated blood flow and an anatomical model derived from medical imaging data from a patient;

second logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to compare the simulated perfusion map to a measured perfusion map, the comparison providing a degree of mismatch therebetween, the measured perfusion map representing perfusion in the patient as measured by the medical imaging system;

third logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to determine whether the degree of mismatch between the simulated perfusion map and the measured perfusion map exceeds a predefined threshold;

fourth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to modify a parameter in a model used in calculating the blood flow when the degree of mismatch exceeds the predefined threshold;

fifth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to compute a hemodynamic quantity from the simulated perfusion map when the degree of mismatch is less than the predefined threshold, the hemodynamic quantity being indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis; and

sixth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to display the hemodynamic quantity indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis.

wherein the hemodynamic quantity is a measure of a blood flow velocity, a vessel blood pressure, a blood pressure ratio, a blood flow rate, a fractional flow reserve, a hyperemic stenosis resistance, an index of myocardial resistance, or a combination thereof.

19. The system of claim 18 further comprising:

seventh logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to generate an anatomical model of a coronary vessel and of at least a portion of a myocardium based on medical imaging data acquired from a patient;

eighth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to partition the anatomical model into a plurality of perfusion territories;

ninth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to apply a boundary condition at a boundary point of the coronary vessel;

tenth logic stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the processor to perform a CFD computation to obtain the blood flow and a pressure.

20. In a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored therein data representing instructions executable by a programmed processor for determining functional severity of a stenosis, the storage medium comprising instructions for:

generating a simulated perfusion map where perfusion in the simulated perfusion map is a function of a calculated blood flow and an anatomical model derived from medical imaging data from a patient;

comparing the simulated perfusion map to a measured perfusion map, the comparing providing a degree of mismatch therebetween, the measured perfusion map representing perfusion in a patient from a scan of the patient;

determining whether the degree of mismatch between the simulated perfusion map and the measured perfusion map exceeds a predefined threshold;

modifying a parameter in a model used in calculating the blood flow when the degree of mismatch exceeds a predefined threshold;

computing a hemodynamic quantity from the simulated perfusion map when the degree of mismatch is less than the predefined threshold, the hemodynamic quantity being indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis; and

displaying the hemodynamic quantity indicative of the functional severity of the stenosis.

wherein the hemodynamic quantity is a measure of a blood flow velocity, a vessel blood pressure, a blood pressure ratio, a blood flow rate, a fractional flow reserve, a hyperemic stenosis resistance, an index of myocardial resistance, or a combination thereof.

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 066088 FRAME: 0256. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jan 17, 2024
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 071178/0246 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066088/0256 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 8, 2017
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 042642/0584 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2014
From: SCHEUERING, MICHAEL; SCHÖBINGER, MAX
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 032769/0830 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2014
From: SIEMENS CORPORATION
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 032726/0251 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2014
From: COMANICIU, DORIN; KAMEN, ALI; SHARMA, PUNEET
To: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032726/0204 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2014
From: COMANICIU, DORIN; KAMEN, ALI; SHARMA, PUNEET
To: SIEMENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032569/0188 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61771978 · Mar 4, 2013
Related Publication 20140249399A1 · Sep 4, 2014
Cited By (20)
US 12,229,957 US 12,236,595 US 12,243,631 US 12,245,882 US 12,283,046 US 12,299,885 US 12,324,695 US 12,324,696 US 12,380,560 US 12,396,695 US 12,406,365 US 12,440,180 US 12,499,539 US 12,555,228 US 12,558,048 US 12,599,352 US 12,620,092 US 12,635,965 US 12,712,082 US 12,714,382