IP Library Granted Patent US 12,243,631
Granted Patent B2
US 12,243,631 · App. 17/722,891 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Devices, systems, and methods for vessel assessment and intervention recommendation

Inventor: David Anderson (Temecula, CA)
Assignee: PHILIPS IMAGE GUIDED THERAPY CORPORATION
G16H20/40A61B5/0215A61B6/032A61B6/4417A61B6/504A61B6/5217A61B8/04A61B8/12G16H50/30A61B2034/102A61B2034/104A61B2034/107A61B2034/108
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,243,631
App. No.
17/722,891
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Devices, systems, and methods of evaluating risk associated with a condition of the vessel and providing an objective intervention recommendation based on the evaluated risk are disclosed. The method includes steps of obtaining physiologic measurements from a first instrument and a second instrument positioned within the vessel of the patient while the second instrument is moved longitudinally through the vessel from a first position to a second position, obtaining image data from an image of a vessel system, co-registering the physiologic measurements with the image data to produce co-registered physiologic measurements, and determining whether to perform a first surgical procedure or a second surgical procedure, wherein the determining is based on the co-registered physiologic measurements. Other associated methods, systems, and devices are also provided herein.

Claims (37)

1. A system, comprising:

a pressure-sensing guidewire configured to be positioned within a vessel of a patient, wherein the pressure-sensing guidewire comprises a proximal portion, a distal portion, and a pressure sensor coupled to the distal portion; and

a processor configured for communication with the pressure-sensing guidewire, wherein the processor is configured to:

obtain a plurality of pressure measurements from the pressure-sensing guidewire at a plurality of locations along the vessel and a pressure-sensing instrument;

determine, based on the plurality of pressure measurements, a plurality of pressure ratios corresponding to the plurality of locations;

obtain an external image of the vessel;

co-register the plurality of pressure ratios with the plurality of locations in the external image;

determine, using a disease quantification score (DSQ) calculator, a total DSQ associated with the vessel, wherein the total DSQ [score] comprises a first contribution from a first segment of the vessel and a second contribution from a second segment of the vessel;

generate a pressure-based view of the external image based on the plurality of pressure ratios, wherein the pressure-based view comprises a plurality of pressure ratio markers distributed along the vessel in the external image at the corresponding plurality of locations;

generate a DSQ-based view of the external image based on the total DSQ, wherein the DSQ-based view comprises:

the external image; and

a first numerical value of the first contribution overlaid on the external image at a first location of the vessel specific to the first segment; and

output, to a display in communication with the processor, a user interface comprising:

an external image area comprising one of the pressure-based view or the DSQ-based view; and

a numerical value of the total DSQ.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the numerical value of the total DSQ is displayed proximate to the external image area in the user interface when the external image area comprises the pressure-based view and when the external image area comprises the DSQ-based view.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user interface further comprises a view button for the external image area.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the DSQ-based view comprises further comprises a second numerical value of the second contribution overlaid on the external image at a second location of the vessel specific to the second segment.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the pressure-based view comprises a visual representation of the plurality of pressure ratios in the external image.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the visual representation of the plurality of pressure ratios corresponds to the plurality of pressure ratio markers.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the total DSQ comprises an image-based DSQ.

8. The system of claim 7 ,

wherein the processor is configured to calculate a total functional DSQ associated with the vessel, and

wherein the user interface further comprises a visual representation of the total functional DSQ.

9. The system of claim 8 ,

wherein the image-based DSQ comprises a SYNTAX score, and

wherein the total functional DSQ comprises a functional SYNTAX score.

10. The system of claim 8 ,

wherein the total functional DSQ comprises a third contribution from the first segment of the vessel,

wherein the DSQ-based view further comprises a third numerical value of the third contribution overlaid on the external image at the first location of the vessel specific to the first segment.

11. The system of claim 3 , wherein the view button is displayed proximate to the external image area in the user interface.

12. The system of claim 3 , wherein the processor is further configured to receive a user input on the view button to switch the external image area to the other of the pressure-based view or the DSQ-based view.

13. The system of claim 3 , wherein the view button is displayed in the user interface when the external image area comprises the pressure-based view and when the external image area comprises the DSQ-based view.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of locations along the vessel are representative of movement of the pressure-sensing guidewire through the vessel.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the first segment is predefined by the DSQ calculator such that the first location is distinct from the plurality of locations.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the first numerical value comprises a first visual appearance and the third numerical value comprises a second visual appearance distinguishable from the first visual appearance.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the first visual appearance comprises a first shape and the second visual appearance comprises a different, second shape.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 14961505 · Dec 7, 2015
Provisional Application 62089039 · Dec 8, 2014
Related Publication 20220246271A1 · Aug 4, 2022
References Cited (24)
US 6930014B2 · Kim · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7930014B2 · Huennekens · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8548778B1 · Hart · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8824752B1 · Fonte · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8984248B2 · Morishita · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10052031B2 · Sharma · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20030176778A1 · Messing · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20080194806A1 · Yedgar · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20130046190A1 · Davies · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130246034A1 · Sharma · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100451A1 · Tolkowsky · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140114618A1 · Fonte · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140194755A1 · Ide · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140200867A1 · Lavi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150025330A1 · Davies · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066818A1 · Choi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150250438A1 · Bozkaya · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150265162A1 · Lavi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150302139A1 · Sankaran · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006093776A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013028612A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014139024A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Georgios Sianos et al “The Syntax Score: An Angiographic Tool Grading the Complexity of Coronary Artery Disease,” EUROINTERVENTION, vol. 1, No. 2, 2005, pp. 219-227. [cited by applicant]
Chang-Wook Nam, et al “Functional Syntax Score for Risk Assessment in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease”, Journal of American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1211-1218. [cited by applicant]