IP Library Granted Patent US 9,180,144
Granted Patent B2
US 9,180,144 · App. 14/445,727 · Granted Nov 10, 2015

Decellularisation of tissue matrices for bladder implantation

Inventors: Fiona Bolland (York, GB); Jennifer Southgate (York, GB); Sotirios Korossis (Leeds, GB); Eileen Ingham (Leeds, GB)
Assignee: Tissue Regenix Limited
A61K35/22A61F2/042A61L27/3604A61L27/3679A61L27/3687A61L27/38C12N5/0068G01N33/5088A61L2430/00A61L2430/22A61L2430/40C12N5/0605C12N2509/00C12N2533/92
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,180,144
App. No.
14/445,727
Granted
Nov 10, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides an improved method of producing a natural, acellular matrix scaffold for subsequent use in tissue-engineered replacement of tissues such as the bladder. Decellularisation is carried out on an expanded or distended bladder and the product retains the strength and compliance of natural material. The invention also provides use of the matrix scaffolds as wound healing material and to investigate tissue structure and function in vitro.

Claims (28)

1. A biocompatible implant material produced by a method comprising:

(i) immersing a bladder material in a buffer solution at a mild alkaline pH which includes a proteolytic inhibitor;

(ii) expanding the bladder by introducing a sufficient volume of the same buffer solution into an interior cavity of the bladder so as to stretch and thin the bladder wall; and

(iii) continuing decellularisation of the bladder by replacing and introducing fresh solutions both around the exterior surface of the bladder and into the bladder interior itself so as to maintain expansion of the bladder during decellularisation and to maintain the histoarchitecture of the bladder material.

2. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the biocompatible implant material is characterised by a DNA content of less than 0.2 μg/mg dry weight, a suture retention strength (Fmax) of between 3-6 N, ultimate tensile strength (apex to base) of between 1-4 MPa, and failure strength (apex to base) of between 70-150%.

3. A product comprising decellularised whole bladder, sheet or patch thereof, the product being characterised by a DNA content of less than 0.2 μg/mg dry weight, a suture retention strength (Fmax) of between 3-6 N, ultimate tensile strength (apex to base) of between 1-4 MPa, and failure strength (apex to base) of between 70-150%.

4. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the biocompatible implant material is a reconstructive surgical transplant tissue for congenital or acquired bladder defects.

5. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein step (ii) is performed prior to step (i).

6. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the bladder is clamped before and after each step of fluid replacement so as to prevent fluid loss and to maintain expansion of the bladder.

7. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the fluid volume added to the interior cavity of the bladder at each step is between 250 ml and 750 ml.

8. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the fluid volume added to the interior cavity of the bladder at each step is about 500 ml.

9. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the fluid volume around the exterior of the bladder is sufficient to cover or immerse the whole of the expanded fluid filled bladder.

10. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein once the process of decellularisation is complete, the bladder is either dissected to form a flattened sheet or is intact.

11. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the intact bladder is a whole bladder.

12. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the bladder is derived from a pig or a human.

13. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the step of continuing decellularisation comprises:

removing said buffer at a mild alkaline pH which comprises a proteolytic inhibitor from both the interior cavity of the bladder and the surrounding exterior area and replacing it with an anionic detergent at a mild alkaline pH at a concentration which is sufficient to effect decellularisation but which maintains the histoarchitecture of the biological material;

(ii) removing said detergent from the interior of the bladder and its exterior and replacing it with a washing buffer solution at a mild alkaline pH both with and without proteolytic inhibitors so as to wash both the interior and/or exterior surfaces of the bladder;

(iii) removing said washing buffer from both the interior of the bladder and its exterior and replacing it with a solution comprising one or more enzymes selected from the group consisting of DNase Type I, DNase Type II, and RNase; and

(iv) optionally removing the solution comprising one or more enzymes from the interior of the bladder and its exterior and optionally placing the biological material in a cryoprotectant medium or storage medium for later use.

14. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the method obtainable thereby further includes modifying the decellularised bladder with a chemical or enzymic agent to enhance immunoacceptability of the bladder.

15. The biocompatible implant material of claim 14 , wherein the enzymic agent is an α-galactosidase or a glycosidase digestion to remove α-gal epitopes (Gal α1-3 Gal β1-4Glc NAC-R).

16. The biocompatible implant material of claim 14 , wherein the chemical agent is a cross-linking agent.

17. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the method obtainable thereby further includes the step of recellularisation.

18. The biocompatible implant material of claim 17 , wherein recellularisation is enhanced by addition of a suitable agent administered either in vitro or in vivo.

19. The biocompatible implant material of claim 18 , wherein the agent is coated directly onto the decellularised bladder prior to implantation to provide recellularisation.

20. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the proteolytic inhibitor is ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in an amount from 1 mM to 100 mM or 0.01 to 1.0% w/v.

21. The biocompatible implant material of claim 1 , wherein the proteolytic inhibitor is Aprotinin in an amount of from 1 KIU to 100 KIU.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST (REVOLVING) Recorded Jun 6, 2019
From: CELLRIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; TISSUE REGENIX WOUND CARE INC.; TISSUE REGENIX GROUP PLC; TISSUE REGENIX LIMITED
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 049389/0717 →
SECURITY INTEREST (TERM) Recorded Jun 6, 2019
From: CELLRIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; TISSUE REGENIX WOUND CARE INC.; TISSUE REGENIX GROUP PLC; TISSUE REGENIX LIMITED
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 049389/0732 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 0606231.9 · Mar 29, 2006 · national
Continuity (2)
Division 12295190
Related Publication 20150018966A1 · Jan 15, 2015