Response-based determination of piezoelectric transducer state
Piezoelectric sensor controllers may facilitate detection and identification of various potential fault states with parameter measurements. In an illustrative embodiment of a piezoelectric-based sensor having response-parameter-based fault diagnosis, the sensor includes a piezoelectric transducer and a controller. The controller drives the piezoelectric transducer to generate bursts of acoustic energy and, based on a response of the piezoelectric transducer to said driving, identifies a corresponding transducer state from a set of potential states including multiple transducer fault states. An illustrative embodiment of a sensing method having fault diagnosis, the method includes: driving a piezoelectric transducer to generate a burst of acoustic energy; monitoring a response of the piezoelectric transducer to said driving; identifying, based on said response, a corresponding transducer state from a set of potential states including multiple transducer fault states; and if the transducer state is a fault state, reporting that fault state.
1. A sensor that comprises:
a piezoelectric transducer; and
a controller that drives the piezoelectric transducer to generate bursts of acoustic energy and, based on a response of the piezoelectric transducer to said driving, identifies a corresponding transducer state from a set of potential states including multiple types of transducer fault states, the identification of any such transducer fault state indicating the type of said transducer fault state,
wherein as part of identifying a corresponding transducer state, the controller derives a quality factor (Q) from the response, and
wherein the controller measures the quality factor during a driving stage of the response.
2. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the multiple types of transducer fault states include: loaded, impeded, and defective.
3. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein as part of identifying a corresponding transducer state, the controller derives a resonant frequency from the response.
4. The sensor of claim 3 , wherein the controller measures the resonant frequency during a reverberation stage of the response.
5. The sensor of claim 4 , wherein the controller shorts the piezoelectric transducer while measuring the resonant frequency.
6. The sensor of claim 3 , wherein the controller measures the resonant frequency during the driving stage of the response by comparing phases of current and voltage supplied to the piezoelectric transducer.
7. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein the controller measures the quality factor during the driving stage of the response by measuring the frequency dependence of the response.
8. The sensor of claim 1 , wherein as part of identifying a corresponding transducer state, the controller derives at least two parameters of the piezoelectric transducer from the response.
9. A method of operating a piezoelectric-based sensor, the method comprising:
driving a piezoelectric transducer to generate a burst of acoustic energy;
monitoring a response of the piezoelectric transducer to said driving;
identifying, based on said response, a corresponding transducer state from a set of potential states including multiple types of transducer fault states, said identifying of any such transducer fault state indicating the type of said transducer fault state; and
if the transducer state is a fault state, reporting the type of that fault state, wherein said identifying includes deriving a quality factor (Q) from the response and said deriving includes measuring the quality factor during a driving stage of the response.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the multiple types of transducer fault states include: loaded, impeded, and defective.
11. The method of claim 9 , wherein said identifying includes deriving a resonant frequency from the response.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein said deriving includes measuring the resonant frequency during a reverberation stage of the response.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said deriving includes shorting the piezoelectric transducer while measuring the resonant frequency.
14. The method of claim 11 , wherein said deriving a resonant frequency occurs during the driving stage of the response and includes comparing phases of current and voltage supplied to the piezoelectric transducer.
15. The method of claim 9 , wherein said measuring the quality factor includes determining the frequency dependence of the response.
16. The method of claim 9 , wherein said identifying includes deriving at least two parameters of the piezoelectric transducer from the response.
17. A controller for a piezoelectric transducer, the controller comprising:
a transmitter to drive a piezoelectric transducer to generate bursts of acoustic energy;
a receiver to sense a response of the piezoelectric transducer to said driving; and
a core logic circuit coupled to the transmitter and to the receiver, the core logic circuit operable to identify, based on said response, a transducer state from a set of potential states including multiple types of transducer fault states, said identification of any such transducer fault state indicating the type of said transducer fault state,
wherein as part of identifying a corresponding transducer state, the core logic circuit measures a quality factor (Q) during a driving stage of the response.
18. The controller of claim 17 , wherein the receiver senses the response while the transmitter drives the piezoelectric transducer with a carrier signal pulse.
19. The controller of claim 17 , wherein the receiver senses the response during a reverberation period of the piezoelectric transducer after the transmitter completes a carrier signal pulse.
20. The controller of claim 17 , wherein the receiver senses the response while the transmitter drives the piezoelectric transducer with a chirp signal.