IP Library Granted Patent US 10,780,012
Granted Patent B2
US 10,780,012 · App. 16/116,298 · Granted Sep 22, 2020

Exoskeleton fit evaluation system and method

Inventors: Callum Lamb (San Bruno, CA); Kevin Kemper (San Francisco, CA); Tim Swift (Walnut Creek, CA)
Assignee: Roam Robotics Inc.
A61H3/00A61H1/024A61H1/0266B25J9/0006A61H2201/1238A61H2201/164A61H2201/165A61H2201/1642A61H2201/1676A61H2201/5007A61H2201/5058A61H2201/5061A61H2201/5064A61H2201/5069A61H2201/5084A61H2203/0406A61H2205/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,780,012
App. No.
16/116,298
Filed
Aug 29, 2018
Granted
Sep 22, 2020
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2852
USPC
73/379.01
Abstract

A method of performing a fit test on an actuator unit coupled to a user. The method includes determining a first configuration of the actuator unit while the actuator unit is in an un-actuating state and while the user is in a fit test position; actuating the actuator unit; determining a second configuration of the actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the leg actuator unit; determining a change in configuration of the actuator unit based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration; and determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the actuator unit to the user.

Claims (69)

1. A method of performing a static fit test on a wearable pneumatic exoskeleton system coupled to a user:

coupling the wearable pneumatic exoskeleton to legs of a user, the wearable pneumatic exoskeleton comprising:

a left and right pneumatic leg actuator unit respectively associated with a left and right leg of the user, the left and right pneumatic actuator units each including:

a rotatable joint configured to be aligned with a rotational axis of a knee of the user wearing the pneumatic exoskeleton system,

an upper arm coupled to the rotatable joint and extending along a length of an upper leg portion above the knee of the user wearing the pneumatic exoskeleton system,

a lower arm coupled to the rotatable joint and extending along a length of a lower leg portion below the knee of the user wearing the pneumatic exoskeleton system, and

an inflatable bellows actuator defining a bellows cavity, the inflatable bellows actuator configured to extend along a length of the bellows actuator when pneumatically inflated by introducing pneumatic fluid into the bellows cavity and configured to actuate the upper arm and lower arm;

a pneumatic system configured to introduce pneumatic fluid to the bellows actuators of the pneumatic leg actuator units to independently actuate the bellows actuators, and

an exoskeleton computing device including:

a plurality of sensors,

a memory storing at least a static fit test program, and

a processor configured to execute the static fit test program to control the pneumatic system; and

executing the static fit test program by the processor to cause the exoskeleton device to:

generate a static fit testing position indication instructing the user to assume a seated position with the knees of the user in a bent position;

determining that the user has assumed the seated position with the knees of the user in a suitable bent position;

determining a first configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit while the right pneumatic leg actuator is in an un-actuating state, the determining of the first configuration based at least in part on data obtained from a subset of the plurality of sensors;

actuating the right pneumatic leg actuator unit with the user remaining in the seated position with the knees of the user in the suitable bent position;

determining a second configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the right pneumatic leg actuator unit, the determining of the second configuration based at least in part on data obtained from the subset of the plurality of sensors;

determining a change in configuration based at least in part on a difference between the first and second configuration;

determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit to the right leg of the user; and

generating an improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit to the right leg of the user.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein executing the static fit test program by the processor further causes the exoskeleton device to, after generating the improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit to the right leg of the user:

determine a first configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the left pneumatic leg actuator unit while the left pneumatic leg actuator unit is in an un-actuating state, the determining the first configuration of the left pneumatic leg actuator unit based at least in part on data obtained from a second subset of the plurality of sensors;

actuate the left pneumatic leg actuator unit with the user remaining in the seated position with the knees of the user in the suitable bent position;

determine a second configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the left pneumatic leg actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the left pneumatic leg actuator unit, the determining the second configuration of the left pneumatic leg actuator based at least in part on data obtained from the second subset of the plurality of sensors;

determine a second change in configuration based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration of the left pneumatic leg actuator;

determine that the second change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the left pneumatic leg actuator unit to the left leg of the user; and

generate an improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the left pneumatic leg actuator unit to the left leg of the user.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the change in configuration based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration comprises: determining a displacement angle of one or both of the upper arm and lower arm of the right pneumatic leg actuator.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the right pneumatic leg actuator upper arm and lower arm are coupled to the right leg of the user via a respective plurality of couplers of a set of couplers, with each of the couplers of the set of couplers including a strap that surrounds a portion of the right leg of user; and

wherein the improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the right pneumatic leg actuator unit to the right leg of the user further includes an indication of one or more of the couplers of the set of couplers being improperly secured to the right leg of the user and an indication that the other couplers of the set of couplers are properly secured to the right leg of the user.

5. A method of performing a fit test on a leg actuator unit coupled to a user, the method comprising:

coupling the leg actuator unit to a leg of a user, the leg actuator unit comprising:

a joint configured to be aligned with a knee of the leg of the user wearing the leg actuator unit;

an upper arm coupled to the joint and extending along a length of an upper leg portion above the knee of the user wearing the leg actuator unit;

a lower arm coupled to the joint and extending along a length of a lower leg portion below the knee of the user wearing the leg actuator unit; and

an actuator configured to actuate the upper arm and lower arm;

determining that the leg of the user has assumed a fit test position;

determining a first configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the leg actuator unit while the leg actuator unit is in an un-actuating state;

actuating the leg actuator unit with the user remaining fit test position;

determining a second configuration of the upper arm and lower arm of the leg actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the leg actuator unit;

determining a change in configuration based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration;

determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the leg actuator unit to the leg of the user; and

generating an improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the leg actuator unit to the leg of the user.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising generating a fit testing position indication instructing the user to assume the fit test position.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the change in configuration based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration comprises determining a displacement angle of one or both of the upper arm and lower arm of the leg actuator unit.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the leg actuator upper arm and lower arm are coupled to the leg of the user via a respective plurality of couplers of a set of couplers; and

wherein the improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the leg actuator unit to the leg of the user further includes an indication of one or more of the couplers of the set of couplers being improperly secured to the leg of the user.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein with each of the couplers of the set of couplers including a strap that surrounds a portion of the leg of the user.

10. A method of performing a fit test on an actuator unit coupled to a user, the method comprising:

determining a first configuration of the actuator unit while the actuator unit is in an un-actuating state and while the user is in a fit test position;

actuating the actuator unit;

determining a second configuration of the actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the actuator unit

determining a change in configuration of the actuator unit based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration; and

determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the actuator unit to the user.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising generating an improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the actuator unit to the user.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the actuator unit to the user includes an indication of a specific portion of the actuator unit being improperly fit to the user.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the actuator unit is coupled to the user via a set of couplers; and

wherein the improper fit indication that indicates improper fit of the actuator unit to the user further includes an indication of one or more of the couplers of the set of couplers being improperly secured to the of the user and at least an implicit indication that the other couplers of the set of couplers are properly secured to the user.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the actuator unit comprises:

an actuator joint configured to be aligned with a body joint of the user wearing the actuator unit;

an upper arm coupled to the actuator joint and extending along a length of an upper body portion above the body joint of the user wearing the actuator unit;

a lower arm coupled to the actuator joint and extending along a length of a lower body portion below the body joint of the user wearing the actuator unit; and

an actuator configured to actuate the upper arm and lower arm.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein determining the change in configuration based at least in part on the difference between the first and second configuration comprises determining a displacement angle of one or both of the upper arm and lower arm of the actuator unit.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein actuating the actuator unit occurs while the user remains in the fit test position and wherein the second configuration of the actuator unit generated in response to the actuating the leg actuator unit is generated while the user remains in the fit test position.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the fit test position comprises the user being in a seated position with the knees of the user being in a bent position.

18. The method of claim 10 further comprising limiting a capability of the actuator unit in response to determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the actuator unit to the user.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein limiting a capability of the actuator unit in response to determining that the change in configuration corresponds to an improper fit of the actuator unit to the user comprises limiting power of the actuator unit.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2020
From: OTHER LAB, LLC
To: ROAM ROBOTICS INC.
Reel/Frame 052803/0567 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 29, 2020
From: LAMB, CALLUM; KEMPER, KEVIN; SWIFT, TIM
To: OTHER LAB, LLC
Reel/Frame 052791/0813 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62551664 · Aug 29, 2017
Related Publication 20190060157A1 · Feb 28, 2019
Cited By (12)
US 12,251,355 US 12,251,826 US 12,324,780 US 12,377,010 US 12,454,047 US 12,466,060 US 12,508,185 US 12,514,775 US 12,515,358 US 12,521,296 US 12,703,079 US 12,703,116