IP Library Granted Patent US 12,503,717
Granted Patent B2
US 12,503,717 · App. 16/324,421 · Granted Dec 23, 2025

Systems and methods for modeling disease and assessing adverse side effects of therapeutics therefor

Inventor: Ronald A. Li (Hong Kong, CN)
Assignee: NOVOHEART INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
C12Q1/025A61K31/496A61K31/519A61P9/06C12N5/0068C12N5/0657G01N33/5014G01N33/5061C12Q2600/142G01N2800/326Y02A50/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,503,717
App. No.
16/324,421
Granted
Dec 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure provides a substrate for the ordered growth and development of cardiomyocytes such as ventricular cardiomyocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells along with methods of culturing the cells on the substrates for use in assays such as cardiotoxicity assays. Further provided are methods for assessing cardiotoxicity using one or more criteria disclosed herein.

Claims (20)

1 . A method of assessing whether a compound exhibits cardiotoxicity comprising:

(a) contacting an anisotropic layer of ventricular cardiac cells comprising at least 70% troponin T+ cardiomyocytes on a microfabricated substrate comprising microgrooves oriented along a single axis of the substrate with a compound, wherein microgrooves have a width of 15 μm and a depth 5 μm and wherein spacing between microgrooves is 5 μm;

(b) electrically stimulating the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells at one or more points by a programmed electrical stimulation comprising delivering a train of eight S1 stimuli at 1.5 Hertz, followed by a premature extra stimulus S2 with an S1-S2 interval initiated at 550 milliseconds (ms) and consecutively shortened in steps of 50 ms until capture fails, at which point the S1-S2 interval is increased by 20 ms, followed by 2 ms decrements until an effective refractory period is achieved when the maximum S1-S2 interval fails to lead to action potential propagation and a radiating conduction pattern with an anisotropic ratio of at least 1.8 in response to electrical point stimulation;

(c) detecting an electrical signal propagation in the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells;

(d) determining whether the electrical signal propagation is an arrhythmic reentrant event; and

(e) identifying the compound as exhibiting cardiotoxicity if the electrical signal propagation is an arrhythmic reentrant event.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anisotropic layer of cells comprises patient- or disease-specific cardiac cells derived from a human.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the microfabricated substrate is polystyrene.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells is stimulated at one point.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the stimulation is 5-30 volts with a pulse duration of 5-30 milliseconds.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the stimulation is 10 volts with a pulse duration of 10 milliseconds.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a compound is determined to exhibit cardiotoxicity if the compound induces a spiral electrical propagation wave in the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the compound is a Class 1A, Class 1B or Class 1C anti-arrhythmic compound.

9 . A method for assessing whether a compound is cardiotoxic, the method comprising

(a) contacting an anisotropic layer of ventricular cardiac cells comprising at least 70% troponin T+ cardiomyocytes on a microfabricated substrate comprising microgrooves oriented along a single axis of the substrate with a compound, wherein microgrooves have a width of 15 μm and a depth 5 μm and wherein spacing between microgrooves is 5 μm; and

(b) determining the compound is cardiotoxic if the compound induces an arrhythmic reentrant event in the cardiac cells after administering a programmed electrical stimulation comprising a train of eight S1 stimuli delivered at 1.5 Hertz followed by a premature extra stimulus S2 with S1-S2 interval initiated at 550 milliseconds (ms) and consecutively shortened in steps of 50 ms until capture fails, at which point the S1-S2 interval is increased by 20 ms, followed by 2 ms decrements until the effective refractory period is achieved when the maximum S1-S2 interval fails to lead to action potential propagation.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the cardiac cells are attached to the microfabricated substrate.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells are healthy cells.

12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the anisotropic layer of cardiac cells are genetically, chemically, physically or electrically disposed to a cardiac arrhythmia or disease.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the cardiac arrhythmia or disease is or results from Long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, genetic heart disease, amyloidosis, progeria, diabetic coma, jellyfish intoxication, hyperthyroidism, Yellow Fever, Chagas disease, aortic valve regurgitation, prescription drug abuse, Rett syndrome, myocarditis, tricuspid atresia, Lyme disease, Churg-Strauss syndrome, forms of heart disease or failure involving arrhythmia, enlarged heart, broken heart syndrome, thyroid nodules, atrioventricular canal defect, cholera, mitral valve stenosis, multiple system atrophy (MSA), snoring, mitral valve prolapse, amniotic fluid embolism, gangrene, aplastic anemia, congenital heart disease in adults, heat exhaustion, Graves' disease, cardiomyopathy, premature ventricular contractions, Bradycardia, fatigue, tachycardia, dizziness, or shortness of breath.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2022
From: NOVOHEART LIMITED
To: NOVOHEART INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Reel/Frame 060756/0260 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2019
From: LI, RONALD
To: NOVOHEART LIMITED
Reel/Frame 049315/0506 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62373748 · Aug 11, 2016
Related Publication 20190169670A1 · Jun 6, 2019
References Cited (50)
US 20060136028A1 · Ross · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20120027807A1 · Chien · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120142556A1 · Parker · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140342445A1 · Ingber · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140349332A1 · Yasuda et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150125952A1 · Kim · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150353894A1 · Li · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CN 103987854A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104931683A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104974937A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014116874A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015003064A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Microfabrication, What is Microfabrication, Webpage, Jul. 17, 2017, https://monroeengineering.com/blog/what-is-microfabrication/ (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Sharma et al., Cardiac Troponins, J. Clin. Pathol. 2004; 57:1025-1026 (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Motlagh et al., Microfabricated grooves recapitulate neonatal myocyte connexin43 and N-cadherin expression and localization, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 67A: 148-157, 2003 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Shum et al., A Micropatterned Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Ventricular Cardiac Anisotropic Sheet for Visualizing Drug-Induced Arrhythmogenicity, Adv. Mater., 29(1) (Jan. 2017). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Application No. 17838868, Extended European Search Report, dated Feb. 28, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Brown, “Drugs, hERG and sudden death,” Cell Calcium 35:543-547 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Shrink-Film Configurable Multiscale Wrinkles for Functional Alignment of Human Embryonic Stem Cells and their Cardiac Derivatives,” Advanced Materials 23:5785-5791 (2011). [cited by applicant]
De Ponti et al., “Safety of Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs that Prolong the QT Interval or Induce Torsade de Pointes,” Drug Safety 25:263-286 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Eckardt et al., “Experimental models of torsade de pointes,” Cardiovascular Research 39:178-193 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Enger et al., “Serious ventricular arrhythmias among users of cisapride and other TQ-prolonging agents in the United States,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 11:477-486 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Gibson et al., “Human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes detect drug-mediated changes in action potentials and ion currents,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 70:255-267 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Gintant, “An evaluation of hERG current assay performance: Translating preclinical safety studies to clinical QT prolongation,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics 129:109-119 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Gintant, “Preclinical Torsades-de-Pointes Screens: Advantages and limitations of surrogate and direct approaches in evaluating proarrhythmic risk,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics 119:199-209 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Hawwa et al., “Ranolazine: Clinical Applications and Therapeutic Basis,” Am J Cardiovas Drugs 13:5-16 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Hennessy et al., “Cisapride and ventricular arrhythmia,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 66:375-385 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Hondeghem et al., “Instability and Triangulation of the Action Potential Predict Serious Proarrhythmia, but Action Potential Duration Prolongation Is Antiarrhythmic,” Circulation 103:2004-2013 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Hondeghem, “QT prolongation is an unreliable predictor of ventricular arrhythmia,” Heart Rhythm Society 5:1210-1212 (2008). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/IB2017/001130 dated Jan. 5, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Janse et al., “Animal models of cardiac arrhythmias,” Cardiovascular Research 39:165-177 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Jonsson et al., “Improvement of cardiac efficacy and safety models in drug discovery by the use of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 4:357-372 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “Functional Sarcoplasmic Reticulum for Calcium Handling of Human Enbryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes: Insights for Driven Maturation,” Stem Cells 25:3038-3044 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Lui et al., “Induced pluripotent stem cells as a disease model for studying inherited arrhythmias: promises and hurdles,” Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models 9:e199, 9 pages (2012). [cited by applicant]
Luna et al., “Multiscale Biomimetic Topography for the Alignment of Neonatal and Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Heart Cells,” Tissue Engineering. Part C, 17:579-588 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., “Three Dimension Filamentous Human Cardiac Tissue Model,” Biomaterials 35: 1367-1377 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Monahan et al., “Torsades de Pointes Occurring in Association with Terfenadine Use,” JAMA 264(21): 2788-2790 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Paul et al., “How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge,” Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:203-214 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., “The action potential and comparative pharmacolog of stem cell-derived human cardiomyocytes,”, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 61:277-286 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Poon et al., “Proteomic Analysis of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived, Fetal, and Adult Ventricular Cardiomyocytes Reveals Pathways Crucial for Cardiac Metabolism and Maturation,” Circ Cardiovasc Genet 427-436 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Redfern et al., “Relationships between preclinical electrophysiology, clinical TQ interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development,” C… [cited by applicant]
Regenthal et al., “Drug Levels: Therapeutic and Toxic Serum/Plasma Concentrations of Common Drugs,” J Clin Monit Comput 15:529-544 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Scheel et al., “Action Potential Characterization of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Using Automated Patch-Clamp Technology,” Assay and Drug Development Technologies 12:457-469 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Refining detection of drug-induced proarrhythmia: QT interval and TRIaD,” Heart Rhythm Society 2(7):758-772 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Stevens et al., “The future of drug safety testing: expanding the view and narrowing the focus,” Drug Discovery Today 14:162-167 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Tamargo et al., “Safety of Flecainide,” Drug Safety 35:273-289 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Effect of engineered anisotropy on the susceptibility of human pluripotent stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes to arrhythmias,” Biomaterials 34:8878-8886 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Watkins, “Drug Safety Sciences and the Bottleneck in Drug Development,” Nature 89(6):788-790 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Weng et al., “A Simple, Cost-Effective but Highly Efficient System for Deriving Ventricular Cardiomyocytes from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells,” Stem Cells and Development 23:1704-1716 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Woosley et al., “Mechanism of the Cardiotoxic Actions of Terfenadine,” JAMA 269(12):1532-1536 (1993). [cited by applicant]