IP Library Granted Patent US 10,596,711
Granted Patent B2
US 10,596,711 · App. 16/396,224 · Granted Mar 24, 2020

Systems and methods for providing dynamic vacuum pressure in an articulated arm end effector

Inventors: Thomas Wagner (Concord, MA); Kevin Ahearn (Fort Mill, SC); Benjamin Cohen (Somerville, MA); Michael Dawson-Haggerty (Pittsburgh, PA); Christopher Geyer (Arlington, MA); Thomas Koletschka (Cambridge, MA); Kyle Maroney (North Attleboro, MA); Matthew T. Mason (Pittsburgh, PA); Gene Temple Price (Cambridge, MA); Joseph Romano (Somerville, MA); Daniel Smith (Canonsburg, PA); Siddhartha Srinivasa (Seattle, WA); Prasanna Velagapudi (Pittsburgh, PA); Thomas Allen (Reading, MA)
Assignee: Berkshire Grey, Inc.
B25J15/0616B25J9/1612B25J13/085B25J15/0625B25J15/0658B25J15/0675B25J15/0683B25J15/0691
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,596,711
App. No.
16/396,224
Granted
Mar 24, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system is disclosed for providing dynamic vacuum control to an end effector of an articulated arm. The system includes a first vacuum source for providing a first vacuum pressure with a first maximum air flow rate, and a second vacuum source for providing a second vacuum pressure with a second maximum air flow rate, wherein the second vacuum pressure is higher than the first vacuum pressure and wherein the second maximum air flow rate is greater than the first maximum air flow rate.

Claims (44)

1. A system for providing dynamic vacuum control to an end effector of an articulated arm, said system comprising:

(i) a first air source for providing a positive air pressure;

(ii) a second air source for providing a negative air pressure; and

(iii) a multi-stage ejector coupled at a first end thereof to the first air source for receiving the positive air pressure and coupled at a second opposite end thereof to the second air source tier receiving the negative air pressure, wherein the first air source and the second air source are thereby provided to the multi-stage ejector that automatically selects between a first vacuum source that uses the first air source to provide a first vacuum pressure with a first maximum air flow rate and a second vacuum source that uses the second air source to provide a second vacuum pressure with a second maximum air flow rate responsive to a change in air pressure at an exit of the multi-stage ejector without using an independently actuatable valve, wherein the first vacuum pressure is at least about 90,000 Pascals below atmospheric, and said second vacuum pressure is no more than about 50,000 Pascals below atmospheric.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said first maximum air flow rate is at most about 5 cubic feet per minute, and said second maximum air flow rate is at least about 100 cubic feet per minute.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the multi-stage ejector includes a non-return valve.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the system further includes at least one pressure sensor for providing a pressure sensor signal representative of air pressure at the end effector.

5. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the system further includes at least one flow sensor for providing a flow sensor signal representative of air flow at the end effector.

6. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the system further includes a release source for providing positive pressure at the end effector for ejecting an object from the end effector.

7. A system for providing dynamic vacuum control to an end effector of an articulated arm, said system comprising:

(i) a first air source for providing a positive air pressure;

(ii) a second air source for providing a negative air pressure; and

(iii) a multi-stage ejector coupled at a first end thereof to the first air source for receiving the positive air pressure and coupled at a second opposite end thereof to the second air source for receiving the negative air pressure, wherein the first air source and the second air source are thereby provided to the multi-stage ejector that automatically selects between a first vacuum source that uses the first air source to provide a first vacuum pressure with a first maximum air flow rate and a second vacuum source that uses the second air source to provide a second vacuum pressure with a second maximum air flow rate responsive to a change in air pressure at an exit of the multi-stage ejector without using an independently actuatable valve, wherein the first maximum air flow rate is at most about 5 cubic feet per minute, and said second maximum air flow rate is at least about 100 cubic feet per minute.

8. The system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein said first vacuum pressure is at least about 90,000 Pascals below atmospheric, and said second vacuum pressure is no more than about 50,000 Pascals below atmospheric.

9. The system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the multi-stage ejector includes a non-return valve.

10. The system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the system further includes at least one pressure sensor for providing a pressure sensor signal representative of air pressure at the end effector.

11. The system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the system further includes at least one flow sensor for providing a flow sensor signal representative of air flow at the end effector.

12. The system as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the system further includes a release source for providing positive pressure at the end effector for ejecting an object from the end effector.

13. A method of providing a dynamic vacuum source for an end effector, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) coupling a first end of a multi-stage ejector to a first air source such that the first end of the multi-stage ejector receives positive air pressure;

(b) coupling a second opposite end of the multi-stage ejector to a second air source such that the second end of the multi-stage ejector receives negative air pressure;

(c) providing at the end effector a first vacuum from a first vacuum source that includes a compressor, said first vacuum providing a first vacuum pressure and a first vacuum flow rate; and

(d) switching the dynamic vacuum source to provide at the end effector a second vacuum from a second vacuum source that includes a blower, said second vacuum providing a second vacuum pressure and a second vacuum flow rate, said first vacuum pressure being at least about 90,000 Pascals below atmospheric, and said second vacuum pressure being no more than about 50,000 Pascals below atmospheric, wherein the first vacuum source and the second vacuum source are provided by the multi-stage ejector that employs a non-return valve as a selection mechanism to select between the first vacuum source and the second vacuum source.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein said first vacuum flow rate is at most about 5 cubic feet per minute, and said second vacuum flow rate is at least about 100 cubic feet per minute.

15. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the step of switching the dynamic vacuum source occurs automatically without any input commands.

16. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method further includes the step of confirming, using an output of at least one pressure sensor, that the dynamic vacuum source has switched to the second vacuum pressure that is higher than the first vacuum pressure.

17. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method further includes the step of confirming, using an output of at least one flow sensor, that the dynamic vacuum source has switched to the second vacuum flow rate that is greater than the first vacuum flow rate.

18. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method occurs during application of the end effector to an object to be grasped.

19. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method occurs during a process of lifting an object with the end effector.

20. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method occurs during a process of moving an object with the end effector.

21. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the method further includes the step of providing a positive air pressure to the end effector to urge an object from the end effector.

22. A method of providing a dynamic vacuum source for an end effector, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) coupling a first end of a multi-stage ejector to a first air source such that the first end of the multi-stage ejector receives positive air pressure;

(b) coupling a second opposite end of the multi-stage ejector to a second air source such that the second end of the multi-stage ejector receives negative air pressure;

(c) providing at the end effector a first vacuum from a first vacuum source that includes a compressor, said first vacuum providing a first vacuum pressure and a first vacuum flow rate; and

(d) switching the dynamic vacuum source to provide at the end effector a second vacuum from a second vacuum source that includes a blower, said second vacuum providing a second vacuum pressure and a second vacuum flow rate, said first vacuum flow rate being at most about 5 cubic feet per minute, and said second vacuum flow rate being at least about 100 cubic feet per minute, wherein the first vacuum source and the second vacuum source are provided by the multi-stage ejector that employs a non-return valve as a selection mechanism to select between the first vacuum source and the second vacuum source.

23. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein said first vacuum pressure is at least about 90,000 Pascals below atmospheric, and said second vacuum pressure is no more than about 50,000 Pascals below atmospheric.

24. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the step of switching the dynamic vacuum source occurs automatically without any input commands.

25. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method further includes the step of confirming, using an output of at least one pressure sensor, that the dynamic vacuum source has switched to the second vacuum pressure that is higher than the first vacuum pressure.

26. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method further includes the step of confirming, using an output of at least one flow sensor, that the dynamic vacuum source has switched to the second vacuum flow rate that is greater than the first vacuum flow rate.

27. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method occurs during application of the end effector to an object to be grasped.

28. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method occurs during a process of lifting an object with the end effector.

29. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method occurs during a process of moving an object with the end effector.

30. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the method further includes the step of providing a positive air pressure to the end effector to urge an object from the end effector.

Assignments (3)
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 1, 2022
From: BERKSHIRE GREY, INC.; BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING COMPANY, INC.
To: BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING COMPANY, INC.
Reel/Frame 058947/0548 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2021
From: WAGNER, THOMAS; AHEARN, KEVIN; COHEN, BENJAMIN; DAWSON-HAGGERTY, MICHAEL; GEYER, CHRISTOPHER; KOLETSCHKA, THOMAS; MARONEY, KYLE; MASON, MATTHEW T.; PRICE, GENE TEMPLE; ROMANO, JOSEPH; SMITH, DANIEL; SRINIVASA, SIDDHARTHA; VELAGAPUDI, PRASANNA; ALLEN, THOMAS
To: BERKSHIRE GREY, INC.
Reel/Frame 055364/0892 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2019
From: WAGNER, THOMAS; AHEARN, KEVIN; COHEN, BENJAMIN; DAWSON-HAGGERTY, MICHAEL; GEYER, CHRISTOPHER; KOLETSCHKA, THOMAS; MARONEY, KYLE; MASON, MATTHEW T.; PRICE, GENE TEMPLE; ROMANO, JOSEPH; SRINIVASA, SIDDHARTHA; VELAGAPUDI, PRASANNA; ALLEN, THOMAS
To: BERKSHIRE GREY, INC.
Reel/Frame 049365/0777 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 16047713 · Jul 27, 2018
Continuation 15259939 · Sep 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62262136 · Dec 2, 2015
Provisional Application 62215489 · Sep 8, 2015
Related Publication 20190299423A1 · Oct 3, 2019
Cited By (3)
US 12,263,578 US 12,304,061 US 12,370,699