IP Library Granted Patent US 11,666,039
Granted Patent B2
US 11,666,039 · App. 16/855,905 · Granted Jun 6, 2023

Double knockout (GT/CMAH-KO) pigs, organs and tissues

Inventor: A. Joseph Tector (Carmel, IN)
Assignee: Indiana University Research and Technology Corporation
A01K67/0276A61K35/407C12N9/0071C12N9/1048C12N9/22C12N9/2465C12N15/8509C12N15/8778C12N15/907A01K2217/00A01K2217/075A01K2217/15A01K2227/108A01K2267/025C07K2319/80
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,666,039
App. No.
16/855,905
Granted
Jun 6, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides double knockout transgenic pigs (GT/CMAH-KO pigs) lacking expression of any functional αGAL and CMAH. Double knockout GT/CMAH-KO transgenic organs, tissues and cells are also provided. Methods of making and using the GT/CMAH-KO pigs and tissue are also provided.

Claims (21)

1. A method of increasing the duration of the period between when a human subject is identified as a subject that would benefit from a human liver transplant and when said human liver transplant occurs, said method comprising providing a liver or liver tissue from a pig comprising α(1,3)-galactosyltransferase (αGal) and cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) genes disrupted via gene editing, wherein expression of functional αGal gene product and CMAH gene product in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig, and surgically attaching said liver or liver tissue from said pig to a human subject in a therapeutically effective manner.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said liver or liver tissue from said pig is internal to said human subject when surgically attached.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said liver or liver tissue from said pig is external to said human subject when surgically attached.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gene editing is zinc finger gene editing.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gene editing is TALEN gene editing.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gene editing is CRISPR gene editing.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the disruption of said αGal gene is selected from the group consisting of a 3 base pair deletion adjacent to a G to A substitution, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, a six base pair deletion, a two base pair insertion, a ten base pair deletion, a seven base pair deletion, and an eight base pair substitution for a five base pair sequence and wherein expression of functional αGal in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

10. A method of improving a hyperacute rejection related symptom in a human subject comprising transplanting a porcine organ, tissue or cells having reduced expression of α(1,3)-galactosyltransferase (αGal) and cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) into the human subject, wherein said reduced expression is by virtue of disruption of the αGal and CMAH genes via gene editing in said porcine organ, tissue or cells and wherein said hyperacute rejection related symptom is improved as compared to when a porcine organ, tissue, or cells from a wild-type pig is transplanted into a human subject.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the gene editing is zinc finger nuclease gene editing.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the gene editing is TALEN gene editing.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the gene editing is CRISPR gene editing.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the disruption of said αGal gene is selected from the group consisting of a 3 base pair deletion adjacent to a G to A substitution, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, a six base pair deletion, a two base pair insertion, a ten base pair deletion, a seven base pair deletion, and an eight base pair substitution for a five base pair sequence and wherein expression of functional αGal in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

17. A method of producing a glycoprotein of interest, said method comprising a step of incubating an isolated cell capable of expressing said glycoprotein of interest with a cell culture reagent derived from a pig comprising α(1,3)-galactosyltransferase (αGal) and cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) genes disrupted via gene editing, wherein the amount of N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) and/or αGal epitopes on said glycoprotein of interest is lower than the amount of Neu5Gc and/or αGal epitopes on said glycoprotein of interest when said isolated cell capable of expressing said glycoprotein of interest is incubated with a cell culture reagent derived from a wild-type pig.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein said glycoprotein of interest is selected from the group consisting of an antibody, a growth factor, a cytokine, a hormone and a clotting factor.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the disruption of said αGal gene is selected from the group consisting of a 3 base pair deletion adjacent to a G to A substitution, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, a six base pair deletion, a two base pair insertion, a ten base pair deletion, a seven base pair deletion, and an eight base pair substitution for a five base pair sequence; and wherein expression of functional αGal in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

21. The method of claim 17 , wherein the disruption of said CMAH gene is selected from the group consisting of a four base pair insertion, a two base pair deletion, a single base pair insertion, a single base pair deletion , an eight base pair deletion, a five base pair deletion, a three base pair deletion, a two base pair substitution for a single base pair, and a twenty base pair deletion; and wherein expression of functional CMAH in said pig is decreased as compared to a wild-type pig.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2025
From: TECTOR, A. JOSEPH
To: INDIANA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 072171/0668 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 15848870 · Dec 20, 2017
Division 14436963
Continuation 13804365 · Mar 14, 2013
Provisional Application 61717845 · Oct 24, 2012
Related Publication 20210076647A1 · Mar 18, 2021