Method and system for filtering electronic communications
The present invention discloses a method and system for filtering electronic communications based on the receiver's tolerance for attributes of both a sender and an electronic communication. The receiver's tolerance for an attribute is calculated based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to: self-reported preferences, past behavior and community norms. The attribute score is calculated based on an analysis of how closely either the sender or electronic communication exemplifies the attribute. An electronic communication is filtered if the attribute score exceeds the receiver's tolerance of the attribute. If an electronic communication is filtered it will not show up in the receiver's in-box, it will instead show up in a spam folder.
1. A spam filtering method comprising:
analyzing compatibility of a sender and a receiver of an electronic communication, the analyzing comprising:
calculating a compatibility score based on a compatibility of the sender and the receiver;
determining whether to filter the electronic communication based on the compatibility score;
requesting the receiver provide a response to a plurality of challenge questions; and
requesting a sender provide a response to the plurality of challenge questions;
determining whether the response provided by the sender matches the response provided by the receiver; and
blocking communications from the sender to the receiver unless the compatibility score is within a predetermined range;
calculating an attribute score, wherein the tolerance threshold is a numerical value representing the receiver's tolerance of an attribute; and
wherein the attribute score is calculated, at least in part, by analyzing:
the sender's response to a survey requesting information on the attributes;
the electronic communication sent by the sender; and
zero or more other electronic communications sent by the sender.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the compatibility score comprises a numerical value.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a lower numerical value is indicative of less compatibility and a higher numerical value is indicative of greater compatibility and wherein a higher numerical value is indicative of a diminished chance of the receiver considering the electronic communication spam.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether to filter the electronic communication comprises filtering the electronic communication if the compatibility score is calculated to be zero.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein in analyzing the compatibility of the sender and the receiver comprises:
calculating the tolerance threshold, wherein calculating the receiver's tolerance threshold comprises:
setting a baseline tolerance threshold, wherein the baseline tolerance threshold is based, at least in part on a survey of a plurality receivers requesting information about an attribute, an attribute comprising one or more personal habits of the sender; and
adjusting the baseline tolerance.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein adjusting the baseline tolerance is based, at least in part on analyzing:
the receiver's past history, wherein the past history comprises:
zero or more electronic communications sent by the receiver;
zero or more electronic communications responded to by the receiver; and
the receiver's responses to the survey.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the attribute score is a numerical value representing how much the attribute is exemplified.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the challenge question is a multiple-choice question.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein both the receiver and the sender are requested to provide exactly one response to the challenge question.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the compatibility score comprises setting the compatibility score zero if the attribute score is greater than the tolerance threshold.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving an indication of one or more deal-breaker questions from the receiver to be sent to the sender and a preferred answer to the one or more deal-breaker questions;
receiving an answer to the one or more deal-breaker questions from the sender;
determining whether the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receiver;
preventing the sender from sending electronic communications to the receiver unless the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches the one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receiver; and
allowing the receiver to receive communications from the sender if the answer from the sender to the one or more deal-breaker questions matches the one or more preferred answers to the one or more deal-breaker questions selected by the receiver.