IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,350,010
Granted Patent B2
US 12,350,010 · App. 17/111,942 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Systems and methods for multimodal neural sensing

Inventors: Suhasa Kodandaramaiah (Minneapolis, MN); Leila Ghanbari (Minneapolis, MN); Daniel Sousa Schulman (Minneapolis, MN); Michael Cary McAlpine (Minneapolis, MN); Sarah Swisher (Minneapolis, MN); Preston Donaldson (Minneapolis, MN)
Assignee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
A61B5/0071A61B5/0035A61B5/14503A61B5/14546A61B5/14553A61B5/37A61B5/6847A61F2/2875A61B5/0042A61B2562/046A61F2002/3009A61F2002/30985
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,350,010
App. No.
17/111,942
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method is provided for imaging and monitoring a tissue, such as a cerebral cortex, of a subject. Access to imaging a tissue, such as cerebral cortex, may be provided by removing a portion of a bone, such as a portion of a skull of the subject. A prosthesis, such as an optically transparent prosthesis, may be used to replace the portion of the skull removed and may be conformed to the same 3D contour of the bone that was removed. A data acquisition system, such as an imaging system, may then be affixed to the skull prosthesis and may be used to acquire image data of the tissue of the subject at high spatial and temporal resolution and without interference from intervening bone material.

Claims (51)

1. A system for acquiring data from a tissue of a subject, comprising:

a computer system configured to:

access images of at least one of bone or connective tissue adjacent to a surface of the tissue of the subject, and

generate a contour of the at least one of bone or connective tissue;

a prosthesis to conform to and replace the contour of the at least one of bone or connective tissue, and to replace a missing section of the bone or connective tissue; and

an imaging system, in communication with the computer system affixed to the prosthesis for acquiring data of the tissue of the subject,

wherein the imaging system comprises a sensor,

wherein a plurality of electrodes is attached to the prosthesis,

wherein a combination of the plurality of electrodes and the prosthesis is optically transparent, and

wherein the imaging system includes at least one of a single photon microscope, a miniaturized fluorescence imaging device, a 2-photon (2P) microscope, or a miniaturized light-field imaging module (MLIM).

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the imaging system includes a light source for illuminating the tissue integrated within the imaging system.

3. The system of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of a second sensor, a waveguide, or a microfluidic channel coupled to the prosthesis and configured to acquire data of the tissue of the subject.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the at least one sensor, electrode, waveguide, or microfluidic channel is at least one of 3D printed, inkjet printed, aerosol deposited, or screen printed.

5. The system of claim 3 , wherein the sensor is configured to measure at least one of neurotransmitter concentrations or blood oxygenation levels.

6. The system of claim 3 , wherein the plurality of electrodes are in an array.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the array is an electrocorticography (ECoG) array.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein conductive traces of the ECoG array are encapsulated with a biocompatible insulating coating, while sensing electrodes are left exposed.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer system is further configured to determine the biocompatible insulating coating by determining stability of electrode impedances with different electrode coating materials.

10. The system of claim 3 , wherein the at least one sensor is inkjet printed, and wherein the at least one sensor is a multilayer inkjet-printed sensor electrically insulated by an insulating layer that is inkjet printed over traces of the at least one sensor.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the prosthesis is 3D printed.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the prosthesis is a biocompatible polymer film.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the biocompatible polymer film is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the acquired data includes at least one of optical reporters of intracellular calcium, membrane voltage, images captured at the resolution of sub-cellular structures within a cell, or release of neuromodulators.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein a weight of the imaging system is less than approximately 15% of a bodyweight of the subject.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electrodes is at least one of integrated with the prosthetic or printed onto the prosthetic.

17. A system for acquiring data from a tissue of a subject, comprising:

a computer system configured to:

access images of at least one of bone or connective tissue adjacent to a surface of the tissue of the subject, and

generate a contour of the at least one of bone or connective tissue;

a prosthesis to conform to and replace the contour of the at least one of bone or connective tissue, and to replace a missing section of the bone or connective tissue; and

an imaging system, in communication with the computer system affixed to the prosthesis for acquiring data of the tissue of the subject,

wherein the imaging system comprises a sensor,

wherein a plurality of electrodes is attached to the prosthesis,

wherein a combination of the plurality of electrodes and the prosthesis is optically transparent, and

wherein the imaging system includes at least one of a single photon microscope, a miniaturized fluorescence imaging device, a 2-photon (2P) microscope, or a miniaturized light-field imaging module (MLIM).

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the prosthesis is optically transparent.

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising illuminating the tissue with a light source integrated within the imaging system.

20. The method of claim 17 , further comprising acquiring data of the tissue of the subject using at least one of a second sensor, an electrode, a waveguide, or a microfluidic channel coupled to the prosthesis.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the at least one sensor, electrode, waveguide, or microfluidic channel is at least one of 3D printed, inkjet printed, aerosol deposited, or screen printed.

22. The method of claim 21 , further comprising configuring the sensor to measure at least one of neurotransmitter concentrations or blood oxygenation levels.

23. The method of claim 20 , wherein the prosthesis includes a plurality of electrodes in an array.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein the array is an electrocorticography (ECoG) array fabricated thereon.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein conductive traces of the ECoG array are encapsulated with a biocompatible insulating, while sensing electrodes are left exposed.

26. The method of claim 25 , further comprising determining the biocompatible insulating coating by determining stability of electrode impedances with different electrode coating materials.

27. The method of claim 20 , wherein the at least one sensor is inkjet printed, and wherein the at least one sensor is a multilayer inkjet-printed sensor electrically insulated by an insulating layer that is inkjet printed over traces of the at least one sensor.

28. The method of claim 17 , wherein the prosthesis is 3D printed.

29. The method of claim 17 , wherein the prosthesis is a biocompatible polymer film.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the biocompatible polymer film is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film.

31. The method of claim 17 , wherein the acquired data includes at least one of optical reporters of intracellular calcium, membrane voltage, images captured at the resolution of sub-cellular structures within a cell, or release of neuromodulators.

32. The method of claim 17 , wherein the imaging system is removably affixed to the prosthesis.

33. The system of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of electrodes is at least one of integrated with the prosthetic or printed onto the prosthetic, and wherein the plurality of electrodes follow the contour of the prosthetic.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: SWISHER, SARAH; DONALDSON, PRESTON
To: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Reel/Frame 065622/0596 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2021
From: KODANDARAMAIAH, SUHASA; GHANBARI, LEILA; SCHULMAN, DANIEL SOUSA; MCALPINE, MICHAEL CARY
To: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Reel/Frame 055962/0204 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62944137 · Dec 5, 2019
Related Publication 20210169334A1 · Jun 10, 2021
References Cited (158)
US 8099156B1 · Schnitzer · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9791683B2 · Doric · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9846300B2 · Doric · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10791946B2 · Kuzum · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11497401B2 · Tandon · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11497576B2 · Kells · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11867892B2 · Pathak · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20010025148A1 · Reischl · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20040030258A1 · Williams · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040064052A1 · Chance · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040106856A1 · Kimura · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050107716A1 · Eaton · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060100526A1 · Yamamoto · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060122477A1 · Hirabayashi · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20090005711A1 · Konofagou · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100309547A1 · Hirata · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110237921A1 · Askin, III · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120123236A1 · Boularot · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120230566A1 · Dean · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130046229A1 · Konofagou · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130110252A1 · Bake · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130304216A1 · Paspa · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140005492A1 · Harttig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140257518A1 · McAlpine · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150088224A1 · Goldwasser · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160007874A1 · Ma · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160058316A1 · Vitale · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160296312A1 · Kuhn · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170128015A1 · Rogers · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170199364A1 · Doric · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170363849A1 · Doric · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180178013A1 · Bouton · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180360366A1 · Gayl · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190090801A1 · Rogers · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190380585A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190381314A1 · Howard · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200093474A1 · Macknik · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200405204A1 · Howard · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210059578A1 · Nassi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210077019A1 · Kendall · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220387127A1 · Kao · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Castagnola et al., “Biologically Compatible Neural Interface to Safely Couple Nanocoated Electrodes to the Surface of the Brain”, 2013 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Koletar et al., “Refinement of a chronic cranial window implant in the rat for longitudinal in vivo two-photon fluorescence microscopy of neuro vascular function”, Apr. 2, 2019 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Hlushchenko I, et al. Dendritic spine actin dynamics in neuronal maturation and synaptic plasticity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken ) 73:435-441, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Holtmaat, A. et al. Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window. (2009). doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.89. [cited by applicant]
Hoskison MM, et al: Persistent working memory dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: evidence for a time-dependent mechanism. Neuroscience 159:483-491, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Hwang EJ et al, “The utility of multichannel local field potentials for brain-machine interfaces,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 10, No. 4, p. 046005, Aug. 2013. [cited by applicant]
Hylin MJ, et al: Behavioral and histopathological alterations resulting from mild fluid percussion injury. J Neurotrauma 30:702-715, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Juczewski, K., et al. Stress and behavioral correlates in the head-fixed method. bioRxiv 2020.02.24.963371 (2020) doi:10.1101/2020.02.24.963371. [cited by applicant]
Juneau, J., et al. Enhanced Image Sensor Module for Head-Mounted Microscopes*. in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS (2018). doi:10.1109/EMBC… [cited by applicant]
Kellis, S et al, “Decoding spoken words using local field potentials recorded from the cortical surface,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 7, No. 5, p. 056007, Oct. 2010. [cited by applicant]
Khan Y et al., “Inkjet-Printed Flexible Gold Electrode Arrays for Bioelectronic Interfaces,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1004-1013, Feb. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kim, T. H. et al. Long-Term Optical Access to an Estimated One Million Neurons in the Live Mouse Cortex. Cell Rep. 17, 3385-3394 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Kimtan, T et al, “Printable and transparent micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) for optogenetic applications,” in 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago… [cited by applicant]
Lerner, T. N. et al. Intact-Brain Analyses Reveal Distinct Information Carried by SNc Dopamine Subcircuits. Cell (2015) doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.014. [cited by applicant]
Li, P. et al. Measuring sharp waves and oscillatory population activity with the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP6f. Front. Cell. Neurosci. (2019) doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00274. [cited by applicant]
Lim, D., et al. Optically sectioned in vivo imaging with speckle illumination HiLo microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 16014 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Loane DJ, et al: Progressive neurodegeneration after experimental brain trauma: association with chronic microglial activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 73:14-29, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Ma, Y. Analysis of Resting-State Neurovascular Coupling and Locomotion-Associated Neural Dynamics Using Wide-Field Optical Mapping. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ma, Y. et al. Resting-state hemodynamics are spatiotemporally coupled to synchronized and symmetric neural activity in excitatory neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (2016) doi:10.1073/pnas.1525369113. [cited by applicant]
Maas AI, et al: Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 7:728-741, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Madisen, L. et al. Transgenic mice for intersectional targeting of neural sensors and effectors with high specificity and performance. Neuron 85, 942-958 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Makino H, et al: Transformation of Cortex-wide Emergent Properties during Motor Learning. Neuron 94:880-890, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Marvin, J. S. et al. An optimized fluorescent probe for visualizing glutamate neurotransmission. Nat. Methods (2013) doi:10.1038/nmeth.2333. [cited by applicant]
Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. (2018) doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y. [cited by applicant]
Meyer, A. F., et al. Two distinct types of eye-head coupling in freely moving mice. bioRxiv (2020) doi:10.1101/2020.02.20.957712. [cited by applicant]
Mohajerani, M. H. et al. Spontaneous cortical activity alternates between motifs defined by regional axonal projections. Nat. Neurosci. (2013) doi:10.1038/nn.3499. [cited by applicant]
Mohajerani, M. H., et al. Mirrored bilateral slow-wave cortical activity within local circuits revealed by fast pihemispheric voltage-sensitive dye imaging in anesthetized and awake mice. J. Neurosci. (2010) doi:10.1523… [cited by applicant]
Murphy, T. H. et al. High-throughput automated home-cage mesoscopic functional imaging of mouse cortex. Nat. Commun. (2016) doi:10.1038/ncomms11611. [cited by applicant]
Musall, S., et al. Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat. Neurosci. (2019) doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4. [cited by applicant]
Namiki, S., et al. Optical glutamate sensor for spatiotemporal analysis of synaptic transmission. Eur. J. Neurosci. (2007) doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05511.x. [cited by applicant]
Orsolic, I., et al. Mesoscale cortical dynamics reflect the interaction of sensory evidence and temporal expectation during perceptual decision-making. bioRxiv (2019) doi:10.1101/552026. [cited by applicant]
Palacios EM, et al: Resting-State Functional Connectivity Alterations Associated with Six-Month Outcomes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 34:1546-1557, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Paterno R, et al: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Decreases Broadband Power in Area CA1. J Neurotrauma 33:1645-1649, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Patti, C. L. et al. Effects of sleep deprivation on memory in mice: Role of state-dependent learning. Sleep (2010) doi:10.1093/sleep/33.12.1669. [cited by applicant]
Piatkevich, K. D. et al. A robotic multidimensional directed evolution approach applied to fluorescent voltage reporters. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1 (2018). doi:10.1038/s41589-018-0004-9. [cited by applicant]
Pinheiro-Da-Silva, J., et al. “Sleep deprivation effects on object discrimination task in zebrafish ( [cited by applicant]
Pinto, L. et al. Task-Dependent Changes in the Large-Scale Dynamics and Necessity of Cortical Regions. Neuron (2019) doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.025. [cited by applicant]
Prevedel, R. et al. Fast volumetric calcium imaging across multiple cortical layers using sculpted light. Nat. Methods (2016). doi:10.1038/nmeth.4040. [cited by applicant]
Ramos, A. Animal models of anxiety: do I need multiple tests? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. (2008) doi:10.1016/j.tips.2008.07.005. [cited by applicant]
Resendez, S. L. et al. Visualization of cortical, subcortical and deep brain neural circuit dynamics during naturalistic mammalian behavior with head-mounted microscopes and chronically implanted lenses. Nat. Protoc. 11… [cited by applicant]
Roberts, T et al, “Flexible Inkjet-Printed Multielectrode Arrays for Neuromuscular Cartography,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 1462-1470, Jun. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Rynes, M. L. et al. Assembly and operation of an open-source, computer numerical controlled (CNC) robot for performing cranial microsurgical procedures. Nat. Protoc. (2020) doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0318-4. [cited by applicant]
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods (2012) doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019. [cited by applicant]
Scott, B. B. et al. Imaging Cortical Dynamics in GCaMP Transgenic Rats with a Head-Mounted Widefield Macroscope. Neuron (2018) doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.050. [cited by applicant]
Shemesh, O. A. et al. Temporally precise single-cell-resolution optogenetics. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1796-1806 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Shimaoka, D., et al. Effects of Arousal on Mouse Sensory Cortex Depend on Modality. CellReports 22, 3160-3167 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Shimaoka, D., et al. The impact of bilateral ongoing activity on evoked responses in mouse cortex. Elife (2019) doi:10.7554/eLife.43533. [cited by applicant]
Silasi, G., et al. Intact skull chronic windows for mesoscopic wide-field imaging in awake mice. J. Neurosci. Methods 267, 141-149 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Singh, S., et al. Low-cost solution for rodent home-cage behaviour monitoring. PLoS One (2019) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220751. [cited by applicant]
Skocek, O. et al. High-speed volumetric imaging of neuronal activity in freely moving rodents. Nat. Methods 1 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0008-0. [cited by applicant]
Sofroniew, N. J. et al. A large field of view two-photon mesoscope with subcellular resolution for in vivo imaging. Elife 5, 264-266 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Stirman, J. N., et al. Wide field-of-view, multi-region, two-photon imaging of neuronal activity in the mammalian brain. Nat. Biotechnol. (2016). doi:10.1038/nbt.3594. [cited by applicant]
Abadchi, J. K. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of neocortical activity around hippocampal sharp-wave ripples. Elife (2020) doi:10.7554/eLife.51972. [cited by applicant]
Adam, Y. et al. Voltage imaging and optogenetics reveal behaviour-dependent changes in hippocampal dynamics. Nature (2019) doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1166-7. [cited by applicant]
Adams, J. K. et al. Single-frame 3D fluorescence microscopy with ultraminiature lensless FlatScope. Sci. Adv. 3, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Aghajan, Z. M. et al. Impaired spatial selectivity and intact phase precession in two-dimensional virtual reality. Nat. Neurosci. (2015) doi:10.1038/nn.3884. [cited by applicant]
Akerboom, J. et al. Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 6, 2 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Alali AS, et al: Economic Evaluations in the Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Quality. Value Health 18:721-734, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Allen, W. E. et al. Global Representations of Goal-Directed Behavior in Distinct Cell Types of Mouse Neocortex. Neuron (2017) doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.017. [cited by applicant]
Bachmann B. et al., “All-inkjet-printed gold microelectrode arrays for extracellular recording of action potentials,” Flexible and Printed Electronics, vol. 2, No. 3, p. 035003, Sep. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Barbera, G., et al. A wireless miniScope for deep brain imaging in freely moving mice. J. Neurosci. Methods (2019) doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.05.008. [cited by applicant]
Blakely, T et al, “Localization and classification of phonemes using high spatial resolution electrocorticography (ECOG) grids,” in 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biolo… [cited by applicant]
Blennow K, et al. The neuropathology and neurobiology of traumatic brain injury. Neuron 76:886-899, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Blennow K, et al. Traumatic brain injuries. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16084, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Bolanos, F. et al. Mesoscale cortical calcium imaging reveals widespread synchronized infraslow activity during social touch in mice. bioRxiv (2018) doi:10.1101/430306. [cited by applicant]
Borden, P. Y. et al. Genetically expressed voltage sensor ArcLight for imaging large scale cortical activity in the anesthetized and awake mouse. Neurophotonics (2017) doi:10.1117/1.nph.4.3.031212. [cited by applicant]
Cai, D. J. et al. A shared neural ensemble links distinct contextual memories encoded close in time. Nature 534, 115-118 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Calhoun VD, et al. Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 27:561-579, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nonfatal injury data. Webpage. Version dated Nov. 21, 2015. Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20151121083505/https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html. [cited by applicant]
Chen T-W et al., “Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity,” Nature, vol. 499, No. 7458, pp. 295-300, Jul. 2013. [cited by applicant]
Chen Y, et al: A modified controlled cortical impact technique to model mild traumatic brain injury mechanics in mice. Front Neurol 5:100, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Colavito, V. et al. Experimental sleep deprivation as a tool to test memory deficits in rodents. Front. Syst. Neurosci. (2013) doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00106. [cited by applicant]
Coskun, A. F., et al. Wide field-of-view lens-free fluorescent imaging on a chip. Lab Chip 10, 824 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Creed JA, et al: Concussive brain trauma in the mouse results in acute cognitive deficits and sustained impairment of axonal function. J Neurotrauma 28:547-563, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Daigle, T. L. et al. A Suite of Transgenic Driver and Reporter Mouse Lines with Enhanced Brain-Cell-Type Targeting and Functionality. Cell (2018) doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.035. [cited by applicant]
Dana, H. et al. High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat. Methods (2019) doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0435-6. [cited by applicant]
Dana, H. et al. Sensitive red protein calcium indicators for imaging neural activity. Elife (2016) doi:10.7554/elife.12727. [cited by applicant]
Dana, H. et al. Thy1-GCaMP6 transgenic mice for neuronal population imaging in vivo. PLoS One 9, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Dash, M. B., et al. Long-term homeostasis of extracellular glutamate in the rat cerebral cortex across sleep and waking states. J. Neurosci. (2009) doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5486-08.2009. [cited by applicant]
Dawson, T. M., et al. Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Neuroscience (2018) doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0236-8. [cited by applicant]
De Groot, A. et al. Ninscope, a versatile miniscope for multi-region circuit investigations. Elife (2020) doi:10.7554/eLife.49987. [cited by applicant]
Dipoppa, M. et al. Vision and Locomotion Shape the Interactions between Neuron Types in Mouse Visual Cortex. Neuron 98, 602-615.e8 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Donaldson, P. D., et al. Inkjet-Printed Silver Electrode Array for in-vivo Electrocorticography. in 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 774-777 (2019). doi:10.1109/NER.2019.8717083. [cited by applicant]
Dubbs, A., et al. moco: Fast motion correction for calcium imaging. Front. Neuroinform. (2016) doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00006. [cited by applicant]
Escabi MA et al., “A high-density, high-channel count, multiplexed uECoG array for auditory-cortex recordings,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 112, No. 6, pp. 1566-1583, Sep. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Ferezou, I. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of cortical sensorimotor integration in behaving mice. Neuron 56, 907-23 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Fink, A. J., et al. A virtual burrow assay for head-fixed mice measures habituation, discrimination, exploration and avoidance without training. Elife (2019) doi:10.7554/eLife.45658. [cited by applicant]
Fletcher, C. F. et al. Absence epilepsy in tottering mutant mice is associated with calcium channel defects. Cell 87, 607-617 (1996). [cited by applicant]
Fu, T.-M. et al. Stable long-term chronic brain mapping at the single-neuron level. Nat. Methods 13, 875-882 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Galgano M, et al: Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Endeavors. Cell Transplant 26:1118-1130, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Ganji M et al., “Development and Translation of PEDOT:PSS Microelectrodes for Intraoperative Monitoring,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 28, No. 12, p. 1700232, Mar. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Gao X, et al. Moderate traumatic brain injury causes acute dendritic and synaptic degeneration in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. PLoS One 6:e24566, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Gardner AJ, et al. Neuroepidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol 138:207-223, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Ghanbari, L., et al. “Cortex-wide neural interfacing via transparent polymer skulls.” Nature communications 10.1 (2019): 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Ghanbari, L., et al. “Craniobot: A computer numerical controlled robot for cranial microsurgeries.” Scientific reports 9.1 (2019): 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Ghosh, K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods (2011) doi:10.1038/meth.1694. [cited by applicant]
Gilad, A. et al. Spatiotemporal refinement of signal flow through association cortex during learning. Nat. Commun. (2020) doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15534-z. [cited by applicant]
Gong, Y. et al. High-speed recording of neural spikes in awake mice and flies with a fluorescent voltage sensor. Science (80-. ). 350, 1361-1366 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Green, M. C. et al. Tottering-a neuromuscular mutation in the mouse: And its linkage with oligosyndactylism. J. Hered. 53, 233-237 (1962). [cited by applicant]
Guo, Z. V. et al. Procedures for behavioral experiments in head-fixed mice. PLoS One (2014) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088678. [cited by applicant]
Heo DN et al., “Flexible and Highly Biocompatible Nanofiber-Based Electrodes for Neural Surface Interfacing,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 2961-2971, Mar. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Hermiz J. et al., “Sub-millimeter ECoG pitch in human enables higher fidelity cognitive neural state estimation,” NeuroImage, vol. 176, pp. 454-464, Aug. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Subramanian, V. et al. High-Speed Printing of Transistors: From Inks to Devices. Proc. IEEE 103, 567-582 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Tran HT, et al: Distinct temporal and anatomical distributions of amyloid-beta and tau abnormalities following controlled cortical impact in transgenic mice. PLoS One 6:e25475, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Tsien RY, “The Green Fluorescent Protein,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 509-544, Jun. 1998. [cited by applicant]
Valley, M. T. et al. Separation of hemodynamic signals from GCaMP fluorescence measured with wide-field imaging. J. Neurophysiol. (2020) doi:10.1152/jn.00304.2019. [cited by applicant]
Vanni, M. P. et al. Mesoscale Transcranial Spontaneous Activity Mapping in GCaMP3 Transgenic Mice Reveals Extensive Reciprocal Connections between Areas of Somatomotor Cortex. J. Neurosci. (2014) doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1… [cited by applicant]
Vanni, M. P., et al. Mesoscale mapping of mouse cortex reveals frequency-dependent cycling between distinct macroscale functional modules. J. Neurosci. (2017) doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3560-16.2017. [cited by applicant]
Vascak M, et al: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Structural and Functional Disconnection of Local Neocortical Inhibitory Networks via Parvalbumin Interneuron Diffuse Axonal Injury. Cereb Cortex1-20, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Vora, S. R., et al. Postnatal Ontogeny of the Cranial Base and Craniofacial Skeleton in Male C57BL/6J Mice: A Reference Standard for Quantitative Analysis. Front. Physiol. 6, 417 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Waxweiler RJ, et al: Monitoring the impact of traumatic brain injury: a review and update. J Neurotrauma 12:509-516, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Wekselblatt, J. B., et al. Large-scale imaging of cortical dynamics during sensory perception and behavior. J. Neurophysiol. (2016) doi:10.1152/jn.01056.2015. [cited by applicant]
Whiteneck GG, et al: Risk of Negative Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Statewide Population-Based Survey. J Head Trauma Rehabil 31:E43-E54, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Xie, Y. et al. Resolution of high-frequency mesoscale intracortical maps using the genetically encoded glutamate sensor iGluSnFR. J. Neurosci. (2016) doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2744-15.2016. [cited by applicant]
Xiong Y, et al. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:128-142, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Yuk, H., et al. “3D printing of conducting polymers.” Nature communications 11.1 (2020): 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Zong, W. et al. Fast high-resolution miniature two-photon microscopy for brain imaging in freely behaving mice. Nat. Methods 14, 713 (2017). [cited by applicant]