IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,306,132
Granted Patent B2
US 12,306,132 · App. 17/248,211 · Granted May 20, 2025

Aerosol jet printed flexible graphene circuits for electrochemical sensing and biosensing

Inventors: Jonathan Claussen (Ames, IA); Kshama Parate (Ames, IA); Mark C. Hersam (Willmette, IL); Sonal V. Rangnekar (Chicago, IL)
Assignees: Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.; NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
G01N27/4148B29C64/10B29C64/112B33Y10/00B33Y40/20B33Y80/00B41M3/006B41M5/0023B41M7/009G01N27/4145G01N33/5438B29K2001/08B29L2031/752B33Y40/00B33Y70/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,306,132
App. No.
17/248,211
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems of fabrication of high resolution, high-throughput electrochemical sensing circuits on a substrate. High resolution electrochemical sensing circuits are printed by an effective additive technique to the substrate. Optionally, post-print annealing converts electrochemically inactive printed graphene into one that is electrochemically active. The printing can be by aerosol jet printing, but is not necessarily limited thereto. An example is inkjet printing and then the post-print annealing. Ink formulation would be adjusted for effectiveness with inkjet printing. Optionally biorecognition agents can be covalently bonded to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing. High throughput fabrication of high-resolution graphene circuits (feature sizes in the tens of microns <50 μm) for electrochemical biosensing is possible by chemical functionalization of the graphene surface with a biological agent.

Claims (109)

1. A method of fabrication of graphene-based circuits on a substrate comprising:

a. preparing a printable ink of pristine graphene flakes of graphene or graphene oxide exfoliated from graphite produced and dispersed in solvents from bulk synthesis solution processing in a stable dispersion in an ethyl lactate:dibutyl phthalate cosolvent system with a viscosity in the approximate range of 1-1,000 cP; and

b. aerosol jet printing one or more patterns in one or more passes by scalable, high-throughput direct write additive manufacturing on a substrate using said printable ink without stenciling or photolithography, the printable ink allowing a line thickness from a range of line thicknesses that includes sub-100 nm thicknesses and a line width resolution from a range of line widths that includes sub-100 μm widths without pre- or post-patterning steps.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective to convert electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the post-print annealing comprises CO2 annealing.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective for covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the printable ink comprises graphene-nitrocellulose powder.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the aerosol jet printing comprises:

a. no contact with 1-5 mm variable standoff from the substrate;

b. a tightly focused continuous stream of ink with 1-5 micron droplets of a viscosity between 1-1,000 cP;

c. printer parameters to aerosol jet print thin and continuous graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets comprising:

i. sheath flow rates of 40-60 sccm,

ii. carrier flow rates of 15-45 sccm, and

iii. printing speeds of approximately 5 mm/s were tuned to yield thin and continuous traces of graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets on the substrate.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate comprises:

a. a rigid substrate; or

b. a flexible substrate.

8. The method of claim 1 comprising scalable additive manufacturing.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the scalable manufacturing comprises roll-to-roll additive manufacturing.

10. The method of claim 1 used for electrochemical sensing.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the electrochemical sensing comprises biosensing.

12. The method of claim 1 used for at least one of:

a. printable electronic devices;

b. sensors;

c. biosensors;

d. point-of-care diagnostic devices;

e. wearable devices;

f. flexible electronics;

g. MEMs biosensors;

h. optoelectrical biosensors;

i. thermistor biosensors;

j. over the counter testing kits, or

k. food safety monitoring.

13. The method of claim 1 used for an immunosensor, wherein the immunosensor comprises at least one of:

a. monitors both IL-10 and IFN-gamma in an actual bovine sample;

b. has a biomarkers sensing range of 0.1-10 ng/mL; and

c. does not require a redox probe (e.g. metal nano particle) or fluorescent label for sensitive or visibility.

14. The method of claim 1 used for food safety monitoring.

15. The method of claim 1 in combination with a post-print annealing subsystem operated effective for one or more of:

a. converting electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene, and

b. covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the cosolvent system comprises a 9:1 ethyl lactate:dibutyl phthalate cosolvent system.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein the printable ink has 30 mg/mL solids loading.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein the printable ink is filtered through a 3.1 μm filter.

19. A method of fabrication of graphene-based circuits on a substrate comprising:

a. preparing a printable ink of pristine graphene flakes of graphene or graphene oxide exfoliated from graphite produced and dispersed in solvents from bulk synthesis solution processing;

b. creating one or more patterns in one or more passes by scalable, high-throughput direct write additive manufacturing of the printable ink without stenciling or photolithography, and without pre- or post-patterning steps; and

c. post-print annealing the one or more patterns in a CO 2 environment effective to convert electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the additive printing comprises aerosol jet printing or inkjet printing, and the printable ink comprises graphene-nitrocellulose powder.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the additive printing is by aerosol jet printing comprising:

a. no contact with 1-5 mm variable standoff from the substrate;

b. a tightly focused continuous stream of ink with 1-5 micron droplets of a viscosity between 1-1,000 cP;

c. printer parameters to aerosol jet print thin and continuous graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets comprising:

i. sheath flow rates of 40-60 sccm,

ii. carrier flow rates of 15-45 sccm, and

iii. printing speeds of approximately 5 mm/s were tuned to yield thin and continuous traces of graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets on the substrate.

22. The method of claim 19 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective for covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

23. The method of claim 19 in combination with a post-print annealing subsystem operated effective for one or more of:

a. converting electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene, and

b. covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

24. A method of fabrication of graphene-based circuits on a substrate comprising:

a. preparing a printable ink comprising graphene or graphene oxide exfoliated from graphite from a bulk synthesis process; and

b. aerosol jet printing a circuit by direct additive manufacturing on a substrate using said printable ink without stenciling or photolithography for an immunosensor, wherein the immunosensor comprises at least one of:

i. monitors both IL-10 and IFN-gamma in an actual bovine sample;

ii. has a biomarkers sensing range of 0.1-10 ng/mL; and

iii. does not require a redox probe (e.g. metal nano particle) or fluorescent label for sensitive or visibility.

25. The method of claim 24 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective to convert electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene.

26. The method of claim 25 wherein the post-print annealing comprises CO2 annealing.

27. The method of claim 24 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective for covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

28. The method of claim 24 , wherein the printable ink comprises graphene-nitrocellulose powder.

29. The method of claim 24 wherein the aerosol jet printing comprises:

a. no contact with 1-5 mm variable standoff from the substrate;

b. a tightly focused continuous stream of ink with 1-5 micron droplets of a viscosity between 1-1,000 cP;

c. printer parameters to aerosol jet print thin and continuous graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets comprising:

i. sheath flow rates of 40-60 sccm,

ii. carrier flow rates of 15-45 sccm, and

iii. printing speeds of approximately 5 mm/s tuned to yield thin and continuous traces of graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets on the substrate.

30. The method of claim 24 wherein the substrate comprises:

a. a rigid substrate; or

b. a flexible substrate.

31. The method of claim 24 comprising scalable additive manufacturing.

32. The method of claim 24 used for food safety monitoring.

33. The method of claim 24 in combination with a post-print annealing subsystem operated effective for one or more of:

a. converting electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene, and

b. covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

34. A method of fabrication of graphene-based circuits on a substrate comprising:

a. preparing a printable ink comprising graphene or graphene oxide exfoliated from graphite from a bulk synthesis process; and

b. aerosol jet printing a circuit by direct additive manufacturing on a substrate using said printable ink without stenciling or photolithography, wherein the aerosol jet printing comprises:

i. no contact with 1-5 mm variable standoff from the substrate;

ii. a tightly focused continuous stream of ink with 1-5 micron droplets of a viscosity between 1-1,000 cP;

iii. printer parameters to aerosol jet print thin and continuous graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets comprising:

sheath flow rates of 40-60 sccm,

carrier flow rates of 15-45 sccm, and

printing speeds of approximately 5 mm/s tuned to yield thin and continuous traces of graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets on the substrate.

35. The method of claim 34 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective to convert electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene.

36. The method of claim 35 wherein the post-print annealing comprises CO2 annealing.

37. The method of claim 34 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective for covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

38. A method of fabrication of graphene-based circuits on a substrate comprising:

a. preparing a printable ink comprising graphene or graphene oxide exfoliated from graphite from a bulk synthesis process or otherwise fabricating a graphene-based circuit on a substrate using said printable ink; and

b. creating the graphene-based circuits by additive printing of the printable ink by direct additive manufacturing without stenciling or photolithography, wherein the additive printing is by aerosol jet printing comprising:

i. no contact with 1-5 mm variable standoff from the substrate;

ii. a tightly focused continuous stream of ink with 1-5 micron droplets of a viscosity between 1-1,000 cP;

iii. printer parameters to aerosol jet print thin and continuous graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets comprising:

sheath flow rates of 40-60 sccm,

carrier flow rates of 15-45 sccm, and

printing speeds of approximately 5 mm/s tuned to yield thin and continuous traces of graphene ink with minimal satellite droplets on the substrate.

39. The method of claim 38 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective to convert electrochemically inactive printed graphene into electrochemically active graphene.

40. The method of claim 39 wherein the post-print annealing comprises CO2 annealing.

41. The method of claim 38 further comprising post-print annealing the circuit effective for covalently binding biorecognition agents to the printed graphene for the purpose of electrochemical biosensing.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 22, 2023
From: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 066124/0601 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2021
From: CLAUSSEN, JONATHAN; PARATE, KSHAMA
To: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 055902/0345 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2021
From: HERSAM, MARK C.; RANGNEKAR, SONAL V.
To: NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 055902/0404 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62961034 · Jan 14, 2020
Related Publication 20210215636A1 · Jul 15, 2021
References Cited (50)
US 5348593A · Bowe et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 8901620B2 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9834693B2 · Hersam et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9902866B2 · Hersam et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10280317B2 · Hersam · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10876210B1 · Claussen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20090297574A1 · Ahn et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120231576A1 · King et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130248380A1 · Cui · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130323863A1 · Niyogi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140035995A1 · Chou et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140103298A1 · Lee · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140322608A1 · Claussen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150140646A1 · Khattak et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150307730A1 · Hersam et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160134327A1 · Joshi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160177387A1 · Roy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160262262A1 · Findley · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160326386A1 · Toyserkani et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160341722A1 · Lim et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170048975A1 · Johnson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102348A1 · Neethirajan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170196513A1 · Longinotti-Buitoni et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180010001A1 · Hersam et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180328924A1 · Van Grinsven · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20210017408A1 · Fujimoto · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230287226A1 · Panat · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019005708A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019152648A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
International Searching Authority in connection with PCT/US2021/013442, filed Jan. 14, 2021, “International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration”, 21 pages, mail… [cited by applicant]
Ahmed et al., “Toward the development of smart and low cost point-of-care biosensors based on screen printed electrodes”, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, vol. 36(3), pp. 495-505, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Costa et al., “A low cost, safe, disposable, rapid and self-sustainable paper-based platform for diagnostic testing: lab-on-paper”, Nanotechnology, vol. 25, 13 pages, Feb. 12, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Fairchild et al., “A Label-free, Rapid Multimarker Protein Impedance-based Immunosensor”, ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, Tempe, AZ, 5 pages, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Hondred et al., “Enhanced electrochemical biosensor and supercapacitor with 3D porous architectured graphene via salt impregnated inkjet maskless lithography”, Nanoscale Horizons, vol. 4, pp. 735-746, Jan. 31, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Hong et al., “Aerosol Jet Printed p. and n-type Electrolyte-Gated Transistors with a Variety of Electrode Materials: Exploring Practical Routes to Printed Electronics”, Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, pp. 18704-… [cited by applicant]
Jabari et al., “Micro-scale aerosol-jet printing of graphene interconnects”, Carbon, vol. 91, pp. 321-329, Apr. 30, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “All-carbon-based field effect transistors fabricated by aerosol jet printing on flexible substrates”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. vol. 23, 7 pages, May 13, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Maattanen et al. “A low-cost paper-based inkjet-printed platform for electrochemical analyses”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 177, pp. 153-162, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “A simple and direct electrochemical detection of interferon-y using its RNA and DNA aptamers”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 23, pp. 1819-1824, Feb. 25, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Neethirajan et al., “Recent advancement in biosensors technology for animal and livestock health management”, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 98, pp. 398-407, Jul. 5, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Parate et al., “Aerosol-jet-printed graphene immunosensor for label-free cytokine monitoring in serum”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, No. 7, Appendix A1, 37 pages, Feb. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Parate et al., “Aerosol-jet-printed graphene immunosensor for label-free cytokine monitoring in serum: Supplemental Information”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 12, No. 7, Appendix A2, 14 pages, Feb. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Rodriguez-Mozaz et al., “Analysis of bisphenol A in natural waters by means of an optical immunosensor”, Water Research, vol. 39, pp. 5071-5079, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Secor et al., “Wiring up Liquid Metal: Stable and Robust Electrical Contacts Enabled by Printable Graphene Inks”, Advanced Electronic Materials, vol. 4, 6 pages, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Seifert et al., “Additive Manufacturing Technologies Compared: Morphology of Deposits of Silver Ink Using Inkjet and Aerosol Jet Printing”, I&EC Research, vol. 54, pp. 76-779, Jan. 8, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Shafiee et al., “Paper and Flexible Substrates as Materials for Biosensing Platforms to Detect Multiple Biotargets”, Scientific Reports, vol. 5, 9 pages, Mar. 6, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “ Pre-binding dynamic range and sensitivity enhancement for immuno-sensors using nanofluidic preconcentrator”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 8, pp. 392-394, Mar. 2008. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Multiplexed cytokine detection on plasmonic gold substrates with enhanced near-infrared fluorescence”, Nano Research, vol. 6(2), pp. 113-120, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority in connection with PCT/US2021/013442, filed Jan. 14, 2021, 10 pages, mailed Feb. 17, 2022. [cited by applicant]
OPTOMEC 2014 Webinar, “Aerosol Jet Printing of Flexible Electronic Circuitry—Highlights from over 5 years of Research Conducted at the U of M”, 59 Pages, Apr. 2, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,467,814