IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,266,094
Granted Patent B2
US 12,266,094 · App. 17/413,759 · Granted Apr 1, 2025

Learned model generation method, learned model, surface defect inspection method, steel manufacturing method, pass/fail determination method, grade determination method, surface defect determination program, pass/fail determination program, determination system, and steel manufacturing equipment

Inventors: Takahiro Koshihara (Tokyo, JP); Hiroaki Ono (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: JFE STEEL CORPORATION
G06T7/001G01N21/892G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,266,094
App. No.
17/413,759
Granted
Apr 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A learned model generation method includes: using a teacher image including a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion of a surface of steel and having an equal image size, and presence/absence of periodic defects assigned in advance to the defect map; and generating a learned model by machine learning, the learned model for which: an input value is a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion of a surface of steel and having an image size of the equal image size; and an output value is a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects in the defect map.

Claims (82)

1. A method comprising:

acquiring imaged data for which a surface of steel has been captured;

creating a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion based on the imaged data;

creating a determination image for each defect map by converting an image size of the defect map into a predetermined image size; and

inputting the determination image into a learned model, outputting a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects, and determining the presence/absence of periodic defects for the determination image based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects, wherein

the learned model is trained using

a teacher image as an input, the teacher image (i) having the predetermined image size and (ii) being a defect map indicating a distribution of defect portions on the surface of the steel, and

a value concerning presence or absence of periodic defects in the teacher image as an output, and

the predetermined image size has a correct answer rate associated with the learned model that falls within an allowable range.

2. A steel manufacturing method comprising:

detecting periodic defects on a surface of a steel using the method according to claim 1 ; and

manufacturing steel by controlling a manufacturing condition based on the detection result.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a defect mixing rate of the determination image based on the defect portion; and

determining a grade of the steel corresponding to the determination image, based on the calculated defect mixing rate and a determination result of the presence/absence of periodic defects for the determination image.

4. The method according to claim 3 , further including a steel manufacturing sorting step of sorting steel for each grade.

5. The method according to claim 1 ,

when an image size of the defect map used as the teacher image is different from the predetermined image size, the image size of the defect map is converted into the predetermined image size to use the defect map as the input value.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the learned model is being generated by using a test image including a defect map indicating a distribution of a defect portion of a surface of steel and having the equal image size as the teacher image, and presence/absence of periodic defects in the defect map, wherein generating the learned model by using the test image includes:

inputting the defect map of the test image into the learned model to output a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects in the test image;

determining the presence/absence of periodic defects in the test image based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects;

calculating a correct answer rate for the test image by comparing the determined presence/absence of periodic defects with the presence/absence of periodic defects in the defect map of the test image; and

adjusting a generation condition of the learned model according to the calculated correct answer rate.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein adjusting the generation condition of the learned model is to change the equal image size to another equal image size of different image size.

8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein generating the learned model further includes:

setting a plurality of types of image sizes different from one another as the predetermined image size;

calculating the correct answer rate for each type of the image size by using a pair of the teacher image and the test image of each of the plurality of types of image sizes; and

generating the learned model by using the teacher image and the test image that have the image size having a highest calculated correct answer rate, the highest calculated correct answer rate being the correct answer rate of the predetermined image size.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the learned model includes:

an input layer configured to be input, as a determination image, a defect map indicating a distribution of a defect portion of a surface of steel and having the predetermined image size,

an output layer configured to output a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects for the determination image,

an intermediate layer for which parameters have been learned by using a teacher image, the teacher image for which:

an input is a defect map having the predetermined image size as an image size of the determination image; and

an output is a value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects for the defect map,

the learned model causes a computer to function to:

perform calculation on the determination image of the predetermined image size input into the input layer based on the parameters, and

output the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects from the output layer.

10. A method comprising:

acquiring imaged data for which a surface of steel has been captured;

creating a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion based on the imaged data;

creating a determination image for each defect map by converting an image size of the defect map into a predetermined image size; and

inputting the determination image into a learned model, outputting a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects, and determining a pass/fail of the steel based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects, wherein

the learned model is trained using

a teacher image as an input, the teacher image (i) having the predetermined image size and (ii) being a defect map indicating a distribution of defect portions on the surface of the steel, and

a value concerning presence or absence of periodic defects in the teacher image as an output, and

the predetermined image size has a correct answer rate associated with the learned model that falls within an allowable range.

11. A steel manufacturing method comprising:

determining a pass/fail of the steel using the method according to claim 10 ; and

manufacturing steel by controlling a manufacturing condition based on the determination result.

12. The method according to claim 10 , further comprising:

calculating a defect mixing rate of the determination image based on the defect portion; and

determining a grade of the steel corresponding to the determination image, based on the calculated defect mixing rate and a determination result of pass/fail for the steel.

13. The method according to claim 12 , further including a steel manufacturing sorting step of sorting steel for each grade.

14. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program that, when executed, causes a computer to perform processing including:

acquiring imaged data for which a surface of steel has been captured;

creating a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion based on the imaged data;

creating a determination image for each defect map by converting an image size of the defect map into a predetermined image size; and

inputting the determination image into a learned model, outputting a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects, and determining the presence/absence of periodic defects for the determination image based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects, wherein

the learned model is trained using

a teacher image as an input, the teacher image (i) having the predetermined image size and (ii) being a defect map indicating a distribution of defect portions on the surface of the steel, and

a value concerning presence or absence of periodic defects in the teacher image as an output, and

the predetermined image size has a correct answer rate associated with the learned model that falls within an allowable range.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program that, when executed, causes a computer to perform processing including:

acquiring imaged data for which a surface of steel has been captured;

creating a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion based on the imaged data;

creating a determination image for each defect map by converting an image size of the defect map into a predetermined image size; and

inputting the determination image into a learned model, outputting a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects, and determining a pass/fail of the steel based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects, wherein

the learned model is trained using

a teacher image as an input, the teacher image (i) having the predetermined image size and (ii) being a defect map indicating a distribution of defect portions on the surface of the steel, and

a value concerning presence or absence of periodic defects in the teacher image as an output, and

the predetermined image size has a correct answer rate associated with the learned model that falls within an allowable range.

16. A determination system comprising:

a defect map creation unit configured to create a defect map that is an image indicating a distribution of a defect portion based on imaged data for which a surface of steel has been captured;

a size conversion unit configured to convert an image size of the defect map into a predetermined image size to create a determination image for each defect map;

a periodic-defect determination unit configured to input the determination image into a machine-learned learned model and output a value concerning presence/absence of periodic defects; and

a determination unit configured to determine the presence/absence of periodic defects for the determination image and/or determine a pass/fail of the steel, based on the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects, wherein

the learned model has been subjected to machine learning by using a teacher image of the predetermined image size as an image size of the determination image such that the value concerning the presence/absence of periodic defects is output when the determination image is input,

the learned model is trained using

a teacher image as an input, the teacher image (i) having the predetermined image size and (ii) being a defect map indicating a distribution of defect portions on the surface of the steel, and

a value concerning presence or absence of periodic defects in the teacher image as an output, and

the predetermined image size has a correct answer rate associated with the learned model that falls within an allowable range.

17. Steel manufacturing equipment comprising the determination system according to claim 16 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2021
From: KOSHIHARA, TAKAHIRO; ONO, HIROAKI
To: JFE STEEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 056533/0665 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2018-241213 · Dec 25, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220044383A1 · Feb 10, 2022
References Cited (60)
US 6625515B2 · Kerr · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6950546B2 · Chang et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7324681B2 · Chang et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7460703B2 · Chang et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7627163B2 · Chang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 10769774B2 · Leng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20040105001A1 · Chang · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050002560A1 · Yamamoto · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060002605A1 · Chang · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20080063426A1 · Chang · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090046923A1 · Chang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20180307203A1 · Aizawa · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190213734A1 · Leng · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190360942A1 · Kano · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200175352A1 · Cha · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200402221A1 · Ijiri · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200410709A1 · Suzuki · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220044383A1 · Koshihara · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220067434A1 · Nakagawa · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 107735674A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108021938A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108242054A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3315950A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP S58156842A · 1983 [cited by applicant]
JP H05164701A · 1993 [cited by examiner]
JP H07198627A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP H11311647A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004245720A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004354250A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006105791A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009265087A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010139317A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010185868A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 5733879B2 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
JP 2015215183A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016145887A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
JP 2018005640A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 102021944B1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
RU 2320958C2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018165753A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
F. G. Bulnes, R. Usamentiaga, D. F. Garcia, J. Molleda and J. L. Rendueles, “Periodic defects in steel strips: Detection through a vision-based technique,” in IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 39-… [cited by examiner]
Feb. 4, 2020 International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2019/042848. [cited by applicant]
Marcin Kopaczka et al.; “Automated Enhancement and Detection of Stripe Defects in Large Circular Weft Knitted Fabrics”; 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA); 201… [cited by applicant]
Francisco G. Bulnes et al.; “Vision-Based Sensor for Early Detection of Periodical Defects in Web Materials”; Sensors; 2012; vol. 12; pp. 10788-10809. [cited by applicant]
Yong-Ju Jeon et al.; “Detection of Periodic Defects Using Dual-Light Switching Lighting Method on the Surface of Thick Plates”; ISIJ International; 2015; vol. 55; No. 9; pp. 1942-1949. [cited by applicant]
Feb. 4, 2020 Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2019/042848. [cited by applicant]
May 24, 2022 Office Action issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2021121859. [cited by applicant]
Bulnes et al., “Periodic defects in steel strips: Detection through a Vision-Based Technique,” IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE Service Center, vol. 19, No. 2, Mar. 2013 pp. 39-46. [cited by applicant]
Yi et al., “An End-to-End Steel Strip Surface Defects Recognition System Based on Convolutional Neural Networks,” Steel Research International, vol. 88, No. 2, Feb. 2016, p. 1600068. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Artificial neural network,” edited on Dec. 19, 2022 [retrieved online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network#Learning. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Comparison of Deep Learning Software,” edited on Dec. 31, 2017 [retrieved online] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?%20title=Comparison_of_deep_learning_software&oldid=817932283. [cited by applicant]
Matlab & Simulink, “Preprocess Images for Deep Learning” [retrieved online Sep. 17, 2018] https://web.archive.org/web/20180917001356/https://www.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ug/preprocess-images-for-deep-learning.htm… [cited by applicant]
Mainline Metals Inc., “Roll Mark / Bruise from Hot Strip Mill” [retrieved online Sep. 29, 2020] https://web.archive.org/web/20200929132630/https://mainlinemetals.com/resource-term/roll-mark-bruise-from-hot-strip-mill/. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Backpropagation,” edited on Jan. 27, 2018 [retrieved online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%20w/index.php?oldid=822658119&title=Backpropagation. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Computer Simulation” [retrieved online] https://ru.wikichi.ru/wiki/Computer_simulation. [cited by applicant]
V. A. Shterenzon, “Modeling of Technological Processes,” Publishing House of the Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2010, 66 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jan. 2, 2023 Extended Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19906072.4. [cited by applicant]
Nov. 7, 2022 Office Action issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2021121859. [cited by applicant]
Nov. 28, 2023 Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201980086096.9. [cited by applicant]
Yi Zhao, “Application of Deep Learning in Defects Identification of Silicon Steel Sheet”, Digital Technology & Applications, vol. 12, Dec. 15, 2017, pp. 32-34. [cited by applicant]