IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,472,328
Granted Patent B2
US 12,472,328 · App. 17/437,153 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Systems and methods for determining buckling and patient movement during a medical procedure

Inventor: Troy K. Adebar (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
A61M25/0116A61M2025/0166
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,472,328
App. No.
17/437,153
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A medical system comprises an elongate instrument and a control system. The control system is adapted to generate a first model of the elongate instrument and generate a second model of the elongate instrument based at least in part on a reference pose of the elongate instrument. The control system is further adapted to compare the first model with the second model and determine a difference between the first model and the second model. The control system is further adapted to characterize the difference between the first model and the second model and determine a state of instrument buckling based on the characterization of the difference between the first model and the second model.

Claims (33)

1 . A medical system comprising:

an elongate instrument; and

a control system adapted to:

generate a first model of the elongate instrument;

generate a second model of the elongate instrument based at least in part on a reference pose of the elongate instrument;

compare the first model with the second model;

determine a difference between the first model and the second model;

characterize the difference between the first model and the second model; and

based on the characterization of the difference between the first model and the second model:

determine whether the difference is a result of instrument buckling within a patient anatomy; and

determine whether the difference is a result of movement of a patient.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the control system is further adapted to determine that the difference exceeds a threshold.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises characterizing the difference as a drifting deviation, and wherein when the difference is characterized as a drifting deviation, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises characterizing the difference as an abrupt deviation, and wherein when the difference is characterized as an abrupt deviation, the different is a result of movement of the patient.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises characterizing the difference as a non-uniform deviation along a length of the elongate instrument.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein when the difference is characterized as a non-uniform deviation, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises correlating a detection of the difference between the first model and the second model with receiving an insertion command.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein when characterizing the difference includes correlating the detection of the difference with receiving the insertion command, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises characterizing the difference as a uniform deviation along a length of the elongate instrument.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein when the difference is characterized as a uniform deviation, the difference is a result of movement of the patient.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises determining that the difference exceeds a threshold in a direction generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein when the difference exceeds the threshold in the direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

13 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises determining that the difference exceeds a threshold in a direction generally perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein when the difference exceeds the threshold in the direction generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument, the difference is a result of movement of the patient.

15 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises determining that the difference exceeds a threshold at a proximal portion of the elongate instrument.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein when the difference exceeds the threshold at the proximal portion of the elongate instrument, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

17 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises determining that the difference exceeds a threshold at a distal portion of the elongate instrument.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein when the difference exceeds the threshold at the distal portion of the elongate instrument, the difference is a result of movement of the patient.

19 . The system of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the difference between the first model and the second model comprises:

determining that a first deviation exceeds a first threshold at a first portion of the elongate instrument; and

determining that a second deviation exceeds a second threshold at a second portion of the elongate instrument,

wherein the second portion is proximal to the first portion.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the first deviation exceeds the first threshold in a direction generally parallel to a longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument, and the second deviation exceeds the second threshold in a direction generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the elongate instrument, and wherein based on the characterization, the difference is a result of instrument buckling within the patient anatomy.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2021
From: ADEBAR, TROY K.
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 057411/0500 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62818920 · Mar 15, 2019
Related Publication 20220143366A1 · May 12, 2022
References Cited (26)
US 6380732B1 · Gilboa · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6389187B1 · Greenaway et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7416681B2 · Kim et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 10706543B2 · Donhowe · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20060013523A1 · Childlers et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080212082A1 · Froggatt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090220132A1 · Trousset · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100082041A1 · Prisco · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120289777A1 · Chopra et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096377A1 · Duindam et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204124A1 · Giuseppe · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130211244A1 · Nathaniel · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20180177383A1 · Noonan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180318550A1 · Chiu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190192138A1 · Shelton, IV · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190192150A1 · Widenhouse · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190192151A1 · Shelton, IV · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190254846A1 · Gianotti · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200297442A1 · Adebar · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220143366A1 · Adebar · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018009841A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018057633A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019036456A2 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/022238, mailed Jun. 9, 2020, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2020/022238, mailed on Sep. 30, 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]