IP Library Granted Patent US 11,823,778
Granted Patent B2
US 11,823,778 · App. 17/500,499 · Granted Nov 21, 2023

Clinical goal treatment planning and optimization

Inventors: Esa Kuusela (Espoo, FI); Lauri Halko (Helsinki, FI)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
G16H10/60A61N5/1031A61N5/1045G16H20/10G16H20/40G16H50/30G16Z99/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,823,778
App. No.
17/500,499
Granted
Nov 21, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus for developing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plan includes a memory that stores machine instructions and a processor that executes the machine instructions to receive a clinical goal associated with the treatment plan as a user input. The processor further executes the machine instructions to determine a plan objective based on the clinical goal, generate a cost function comprising a term based on the plan objective, and assign an initial value to a parameter associated with the term. The processor also executes the machine instructions to identify a microstate that results in a reduced value associated with the cost function, evaluate a fulfillment level associated with the clinical goal, and adjust the value of the parameter to improve the fulfillment level.

Claims (46)

1. An apparatus, comprising:

a memory that stores machine instructions; and

a processor that executes the machine instructions to:

generate a cost function comprising a parameter value based on a plan objective;

identify a microstate that results in a reduced value associated with the cost function, wherein the reduced value iteratively converges on a resultant value of the cost function;

adjust a value associated with the parameter to improve a fulfillment level of a clinical goal associated with the plan objective;

generate a radiation therapy treatment plan based on the resultant value; and

control a radiation therapy system based on the radiation therapy treatment plan.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the parameter value comprises a machine parameter value.

3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the machine parameter value is selected from the group consisting of a selected field geometry and a selected monitor unit (MU) limit.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the parameter value comprises an optimal fluence and wherein the resultant value is a minimum value.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the parameter value comprises an optimal fluence, and wherein the processor further executes the machine instructions to:

convert the optimal fluence to a leaf sequence; and

reduce a margin defined by the clinical goal.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the processor further executes the machine instructions to:

determine an initial value of the parameter value; and

adjust the parameter value by projecting a gradient to estimate a goal value at which the clinical goal is achieved.

7. A method for developing a radiation therapy treatment plan, the method comprising:

determining a plan objective based on a clinical goal associated with the treatment plan;

generating a cost function comprising a term based on the plan objective, the term including a parameter;

identifying a microstate that results in a reduced value associated with the cost function, wherein the reduced value is iteratively converging on a minimum value of the cost function;

adjusting a value associated with the parameter to improve a fulfillment level associated with the clinical goal;

generating the radiation therapy treatment plan based on the value; and

controlling a radiation therapy system based on the radiation therapy treatment plan.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the reduced value is a total value of the cost function.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein adjusting the value associated with the parameter includes projecting a gradient associated with the term to determine a goal value to achieve the clinical goal.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein adjusting the value associated with the parameter includes estimating a resultant response of a dose distribution associated with a prospective adjustment of the value based on an extrapolation corresponding to a localized response of the dose distribution.

11. The method of claim 7 , wherein adjusting the value associated with the parameter further comprises considering a priority associated with the clinical goal.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein identifying the microstate includes performing an iterative gradient flow analysis.

13. The method of claim 7 , further comprising assigning an initial estimate of the value associated with the parameter based on an estimated dose distribution.

14. The method of claim 7 , wherein the plan objective is associated with a dose level corresponding to a point in a patient.

15. The method of claim 7 , wherein the parameter is associated with one of a location and a weighting factor.

16. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium encoded with instructions operable for execution by a processor to implement operations comprising:

generating a cost function comprising a parameter value based on a plan objective;

identifying a microstate that results in a reduced value associated with the cost function, wherein the reduced value iteratively converges on a resultant value of the cost function;

adjusting a value associated with the parameter to improve a fulfillment level of a clinical goal associated with the plan objective;

generating a radiation therapy treatment plan based on the resultant value; and

controlling a radiation therapy system based on the radiation therapy treatment plan.

17. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the parameter value comprises a machine parameter value selected from the group consisting of a selected field geometry and a selected monitor unit (MU) limit.

18. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the parameter value comprises an optimal fluence and wherein the resultant value is a minimum value.

19. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the parameter value comprises an optimal fluence, and wherein the operations further comprise:

converting the optimal fluence to a leaf sequence; and

reducing a margin defined by the clinical goal.

20. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining an initial value of the parameter value; and

adjusting the parameter value by projecting a gradient to estimate a goal value at which the clinical goal is achieved.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 14, 2023
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 064275/0689 →
CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 13, 2023
From: KUUSELA, ESA; HALKO, LAURI
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 063988/0813 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16580488 · Sep 24, 2019
Continuation 14866587 · Sep 25, 2015
Related Publication 20220036983A1 · Feb 3, 2022