IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,400,377
Granted Patent B2
US 12,400,377 · App. 17/512,613 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Computer-implemented method for determining at least one geometric parameter required for evaluating measurement data

Inventors: Christoph Poliwoda (Heidelberg, DE); Soren Schüller (Heidelberg, DE); Matthias Flessner (Heidelberg, DE); Thomas Günther (Heidelberg, DE)
Assignee: VOLUME GRAPHICS GMBH
G06T11/005G01T7/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,400,377
App. No.
17/512,613
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of measurement data, wherein the measurement data are determined by means of a radiographic measurement of a component having a component geometry, wherein a digital component representation is generated by the measurement data, wherein the method comprises the following steps: determining the measurement data by means of a radiographic measurement of a component; identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions; determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of the determined measurement data, by means of the reference regions. Less computing power than in the prior art is required with the method. Furthermore, the method is able to be employed without great complexity.

Claims (52)

1. A computer-implemented method for determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of measurement data, wherein the measurement data are determined by means of a radiographic measurement of a component having a component geometry, wherein a digital component representation is generated by the measurement data, wherein the method comprises the following steps:

determining the measurement data by means of a radiographic measurement of a component;

identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions; and

determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of the determined measurement data, by means of the reference regions;

wherein determining the at least one geometric parameter includes at least the following substep:

determining the positions of the reference regions with respect to one another in the digital component representation, determining projected positions of the reference regions in at least one portion of the determined measurement data, and using the positions of the reference regions and the projected positions of the reference regions for determining at least one geometric parameter.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein between step: determining the measurement data, and step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the method comprises the following step:

determining a provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of at least one predefined geometric start parameter,

wherein in step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the regions are identified one of in the digital component representation or in a segmentation based on the digital component representation.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein after step: determining at least one geometric parameter, the method furthermore comprises the following steps:

repeating the following steps as long as a predefined termination criterion is not satisfied:

determining a further provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of the at least one geometric parameter;

identifying regions in the digital component representation as reference regions; and

determining at least one further geometric parameter that replaces the at least one geometric parameter and is required for an evaluation of the measurement data, by means of the reference regions.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein in substep: determining the positions of the reference regions with respect to one another in the digital component representation, determining projected positions of the reference regions in at least one portion of the determined measurement data, and using the positions of the reference regions and the projected positions of the reference regions for determining at least one geometric parameter; geometries of the reference regions are taken into account when determining the projected positions.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein in step: identifying regions in one of the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, regions in which one of material or air inclusions are arranged are identified.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein in step: determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of the measurement data, by means of the reference regions, certainty parameters of the reference regions are taken into account.

7. A non-transitory computer program product comprising instructions which are executable on a computer and which, when executed on the computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according claim 1 .

8. A computer-implemented method for determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of measurement data, wherein the measurement data are determined by means of a radiographic measurement of a component having a component geometry, wherein a digital component representation is generated by the measurement data, wherein the method comprises the following steps:

determining the measurement data by means of a radiographic measurement of a component;

identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions; and

determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of the determined measurement data, by means of the reference regions;

wherein determining the at least one geometric parameter includes at least the following substep:

simulating a radiographic measurement on one of the digital component representation or a segmentation based on the digital component representation, wherein the simulation generates simulated measurement data, and using a comparison of the reference regions in the determined measurement data and the simulated measurement data for determining at least one geometric parameter.

9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein between step: determining the measurement data, and step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the method comprises the following step:

determining a provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of at least one predefined geometric start parameter,

wherein in step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the regions are identified one of in the digital component representation or in a segmentation based on the digital component representation.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein after step: determining at least one geometric parameter, the method furthermore comprises the following steps:

repeating the following steps as long as a predefined termination criterion is not satisfied:

determining a further provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of the at least one geometric parameter;

identifying regions in the digital component representation as reference regions; and

determining at least one further geometric parameter that replaces the at least one geometric parameter and is required for an evaluation of the measurement data, by means of the reference regions.

11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein in substep: simulating a radiographic measurement on one of the digital component representation or the segmentation based on the digital component representation, wherein the simulation generates simulated measurement data, and using a comparison of the reference regions in the determined measurement data and the simulated measurement data for determining at least one geometric parameter; the simulated measurement data are generated only for regions in the digital component representation which have reference regions.

12. The method according to claim 8 , wherein in step: identifying regions in one of the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, regions in which one of material or air inclusions are arranged are identified.

13. A non-transitory computer program product comprising instructions which are executable on a computer and which, when executed on the computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according claim 8 .

14. A computer-implemented method for determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of measurement data, wherein the measurement data are determined by means of a radiographic measurement of a component having a component geometry, wherein a digital component representation is generated by the measurement data, wherein the method comprises the following steps:

determining the measurement data by means of a radiographic measurement of a component;

identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions; and

determining at least one geometric parameter required for an evaluation of the determined measurement data, by means of the reference regions;

wherein determining the at least one geometric parameter includes at least the following substep:

varying at least one geometric parameter of the digital component representation in at least one projection of the digital component representation, determining at least one quality parameter in at least one reference region of a reconstruction of the component that uses the at least one projection, repeating the processes of varying the at least one geometric parameter and determining at least one quality parameter in at least one reference region until at least one optimized geometric parameter has a quality parameter that is a maximum value of all determined quality parameters, and using the at least one optimized geometric parameter as determined at least one geometric parameter.

15. The method according to claim 14 , wherein between step: determining the measurement data, and step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the method comprises the following step:

determining a provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of at least one predefined geometric start parameter,

wherein in step: identifying regions one of in the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, the regions are identified one of in the digital component representation or in a segmentation based on the digital component representation.

16. The method according to claim 15 , wherein after step: determining at least one geometric parameter, the method furthermore comprises the following steps:

repeating the following steps as long as a predefined termination criterion is not satisfied:

determining a further provisional reconstruction of the component as digital component representation from at least one portion of the determined measurement data by means of the at least one geometric parameter;

identifying regions in the digital component representation as reference regions; and

determining at least one further geometric parameter that replaces the at least one geometric parameter and is required for an evaluation of the measurement data, by means of the reference regions.

17. The method according to claim 14 , wherein in substep: varying at least one geometric parameter of the digital component representation in at least one projection of the digital component representation, determining at least one quality parameter in at least one reference region of a reconstruction of the component that uses the at least one projection, repeating the processes of varying the at least one geometric parameter and determining at least one quality parameter in at least one reference region until at least one optimized geometric parameter has a quality parameter that is a maximum value of all determined quality parameters, and using the at least one optimized geometric parameter as determined at least one geometric parameter; only the regions of the digital component representation which have reference regions are reconstructed and analysed by means of the varied geometric parameters in the digital component representation.

18. The method according to claim 14 , wherein in step: identifying regions in one of the digital component representation or in the component geometry as reference regions, regions in which one of material or air inclusions are arranged are identified.

19. A non-transitory computer program product comprising instructions which are executable on a computer and which, when executed on the computer, cause the computer to carry out the method according claim 14 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2022
From: POLIWODA, CHRISTOPH; SCHÜLLER, SÖREN; FLESSNER, MATTHIAS; GÜNTHER, THOMAS
To: VOLUME GRAPHICS GMBH
Reel/Frame 059389/0155 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2020 128 288.5 · Oct 28, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220130081A1 · Apr 28, 2022
References Cited (21)
US 5550376A · Gupta · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6379043B1 · Zylka · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7844094B2 · Jeung · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7950849B2 · Claus · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 9036887B2 · Fouras · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 12226233B2 · Chen · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20030167142A1 · Chell · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20070122020A1 · Claus · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070147580A1 · Wu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20170164919A1 · Lavallee · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20250045984A1 · Zhang · 2025 [cited by examiner]
DE 102006011008A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008035656A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102009049818A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015225130A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017201164B3 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016214062A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017205113A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
German Patent and Trademark Office, First Examination Report for German Application No. 10 2020 128 288.5, mail date Apr. 27, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 21203209.8, mail date Mar. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Office Action for EP Application No. 21203209.8, mail date Jul. 12, 2023. [cited by applicant]