IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,624,470
Granted Patent B2
US 12,624,470 · App. 17/522,079 · Granted May 12, 2026

System and method for separating a reaction product from a fluid

Inventors: Eugene S. Beh (Portola Valley, CA); Francisco E. Torres (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Genesee Valley Innovations, LLC
C25B15/087B01D61/002B01D61/427B01D61/56C25B9/19C25B13/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,624,470
App. No.
17/522,079
Filed
Nov 9, 2021
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
VAN, LUAN V
Art Unit
1795
USPC
204/530
Abstract

An electrochemical system includes a first reservoir comprising a first fluid and a catalyst, wherein the first fluid comprises a reaction mixture that reacts to form first and second products, and a second reservoir comprises a second fluid. A first electrode contacts a redox-active electrolyte material solution and has a reversible redox reaction with the electrolyte material to accept at least one ion. A second electrode contacts a redox-active electrolyte material solution and has a reversible redox reaction with the electrolyte material to drive at least one ion into the second fluid as an electrical potential is supplied. A diluted effluent comprising the second product and the catalyst exits the second reservoir, wherein the second product is removed from the first reservoir via electroosmosis, and optionally concurrently via osmosis, and a product stream comprising the first product exits the first reservoir.

Claims (76)

1 . An electrochemical system for separating a reaction product from a first fluid stream, comprising:

a first reservoir comprising a first fluid stream input to the first reservoir and a catalyst input to the first reservoir, wherein the first fluid stream comprises a reaction mixture that reacts to form a first product and a second product in the first reservoir;

a second reservoir comprising a second fluid stream input to the second reservoir;

a first electrode contacting a first solution of a first redox-active electrolyte material and configured to have a reversible redox reaction with the first redox-active electrolyte material, and accept at least one ion from catalyst in the first reservoir;

a second electrode contacting a second solution of a second redox-active electrolyte material and configured to have a reversible redox reaction with the second redox-active electrolyte material, and drive at least one ion into the second fluid in the second reservoir;

an energy source configured to supply electrical potential to the first and second electrodes;

a first type of inert ion exchange membrane disposed between the first and second reservoirs;

a second type of inert ion exchange membrane, different from the first type, disposed between the first electrode and the first reservoir and disposed between the second electrode and the second reservoir;

a waste effluent stream comprising the second product and catalyst output from the second reservoir, wherein the second product is removed from the first reservoir via electroosmosis; and

a product effluent stream comprising the first product output from the first reservoir.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the reaction mixture comprises a first component and a second component which undergo a condensation reaction in the first reservoir.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the condensation reaction moves to completion as the second product is removed from the first reservoir.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the second product is water.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first solution and the second solution are the same and the first and second solutions are circulated between the first electrode and the second electrode when an electrical potential is applied to the electrodes.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first reservoir, the second reservoir, a membrane of the first type, and a membrane of the second type form a cell, and the system comprises a plurality of cells coupled together between the first and second electrodes.

7 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a liquid concentrator coupled to the waste effluent stream and configured to generate a concentrated second fluid stream and a reaction waste stream comprising the second product.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the concentrated second fluid stream is fed to the second reservoir as the second fluid stream.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein a portion of the concentrated second fluid stream is fed to the first reservoir to input the catalyst.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the liquid concentrator is an electrochemical liquid desiccant regenerator utilizing a redox shuttle.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the second product is concurrently removed from the first reservoir via osmosis.

12 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a forward osmosis membrane contactor comprising:

at least one forward osmosis membrane;

a first channel comprising the first fluid stream and the catalyst input to the first channel, wherein the reaction mixture and catalyst react to form the first product and the second product in the first channel;

a second channel separated from the first channel by the at least one forward osmosis membrane and comprising a draw solution comprising a concentrated solution of ionic species;

a draw solution effluent stream comprising the draw solution and the second product output from the second channel, wherein the second product is removed from the first channel through osmosis; and

an intermediate product effluent stream comprising the first product and the catalyst output from the second channel, wherein the intermediate product effluent stream is the first fluid stream input to the first reservoir.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the forward osmosis membrane contactor comprises a plurality of forward osmosis membranes.

14 . The system of claim 12 , further comprising a liquid concentrator coupled to the draw solution effluent stream and configured to generate a concentrated draw solution stream and a second waste stream comprising the second product.

15 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a forward osmosis membrane contactor comprising:

at least one forward osmosis membrane;

a first channel comprising the product effluent stream input to the first channel;

a second channel separated from the first channel by the at least one forward osmosis membrane and comprising a draw solution comprising a concentrated solution of ionic species;

a draw solution effluent stream comprising the draw solution and the second product output from the second channel, wherein the second product is removed from the first channel through osmosis; and

a final product effluent stream comprising the first product output from the first channel.

16 . A method for separating a reaction product from a first fluid steam, comprising:

inputting a first fluid stream comprising a reaction mixture to a first reservoir defined by a first ion exchange membrane and a second ion exchange membrane of an electrochemical cell, wherein the second ion exchange membrane is a different type of membrane from the first ion exchange membrane;

inputting a catalyst to the first reservoir;

inputting a second fluid stream to a second reservoir of the electrochemical cell, wherein the second reservoir is defined by the first ion exchange membrane and a third ion exchange membrane, wherein the third ion exchange membrane and the second ion exchange membrane are of the same type;

a first component and a second component of the reaction mixture undergoing a condensation reaction in the first reservoir to form a first product and a second product;

applying an external voltage to first and second electrodes of the electrochemical cell;

circulating a solution comprising a redox-active electrolyte material between the first and second electrodes, wherein the redox-active electrolyte material reduces when in contact with the first electrode and oxidizes when in contact with the second electrode;

in response to a reduction and oxidation of the redox-active electrolyte material, transporting ions across each of the ion exchange membranes to remove the catalyst and the second product from the first reservoir;

outputting a waste effluent stream comprising the second product and the catalyst from the second reservoir; and

outputting a product effluent stream comprising the first product output from the first reservoir.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein transporting ions of the second product across the ion exchange membranes drives the condensation reaction to completion.

18 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

outputting the waste effluent stream to a liquid concentrator;

generating a concentrated second fluid stream comprising the catalyst and a reaction waste stream comprising the second product;

outputting the reaction waste stream for disposal; and

circulating the concentrated second fluid stream to the second reservoir as the second fluid stream.

19 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

inputting a third fluid stream comprising the reaction mixture to a first channel of a forward osmosis membrane contactor;

inputting a catalyst to the first channel;

inputting a draw solution comprising a concentrated solution of ionic species to a second channel of the forward osmosis membrane contactor, wherein the second channel is separated from the first channel by a forward osmosis membrane;

the first component and the second component of the reaction mixture undergoing a condensation reaction in the first channel to form the first product and the second product;

in response to formation of the second product, transporting the second product across the forward osmosis membrane to remove the second product from the first channel;

outputting a draw solution effluent stream comprising the draw solution and the second product from the second channel;

outputting an intermediate product effluent stream comprising the first product and the catalyst from the first channel; and

inputting the intermediate product effluent stream to the first reservoir of the electrochemical cell as the first fluid stream.

20 . A method for separating a reaction product from a first fluid steam, comprising:

inputting a first fluid stream comprising a reaction mixture to a first channel of a forward osmosis membrane contactor;

inputting a catalyst to the first channel;

inputting a draw solution comprising a concentrated solution of ionic species to a second channel of the forward osmosis membrane contactor, wherein the second channel is separated from the first channel by a forward osmosis membrane;

reacting a first component and a second component of the reaction mixture in a condensation reaction in the first channel to form a first product and a second product;

in response to formation of the second product, transporting the second product across the forward osmosis membrane to remove the second product from the first channel;

outputting a draw solution effluent stream comprising the draw solution and the second product from the second channel;

outputting a product effluent stream comprising the first product and the catalyst from the first channel.

21 . The method of claim 20 , further comprising:

outputting the draw solution effluent stream to a liquid concentrator;

generating a concentrated second fluid stream comprising the catalyst and ionic species and generating a reaction waste stream comprising the second product;

outputting the reaction waste stream for disposal; and

circulating the concentrated second fluid stream to the second channel as the draw solution.

22 . The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

circulating a portion of the concentrated second fluid stream to a first reservoir.

Assignments (8)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073225/0116 →
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064161/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064038/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2021
From: BEH, EUGENE S.; TORRES, FRANCISCO E.
To: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 058059/0369 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230141446A1 · May 11, 2023
References Cited (126)
US 2672024A · Mcgrath · 1954 [cited by applicant]
US 4118299A · Maget · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4593534A · Bloomfield · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4984434A · Peterson et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 6159352A · Riera et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6187201B1 · Abe et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6719891B2 · Ruhr et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7083730B2 · Davis · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7974076B2 · Xiong et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7992855B2 · Awano · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8142633B2 · Batchelder et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8545692B2 · James et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8769972B2 · Bahar · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8801910B2 · Bazant et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8999132B2 · Bazant et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9112217B2 · Kim et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9340436B2 · Sahu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9546426B2 · Logan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9548620B2 · Hu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9640826B2 · Yan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9670077B2 · Volkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9673472B2 · Volkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9905876B2 · Schubert et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10124296B2 · Pozzo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10374239B2 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10525417B2 · Newbloom et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10550014B2 · Desai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10821395B2 · Beh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10822254B2 · Desai et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11015875B2 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11020713B2 · Demeter et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11117090B2 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11149970B2 · Bahar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050183956A1 · Katefidis · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060141346A1 · Gordon et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20150048777A1 · Goldstein · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150232348A1 · Jepson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190240614A1 · Beh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190240623A1 · Beh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200070094A1 · Hussaini et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200164312A1 · Beh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210370228A1 · Benedict et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 206055832 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108187459 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3336064 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 0418919 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130106530 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150034545 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014181898 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 20150143332 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018032003 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018119280 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 20180191806 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Petrova et al., “Perfluorinated hybrid membranes modified by metal decorated clay nanotubes”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 582, Jul. 15, 2019, pp. 172-181. [cited by applicant]
Pismenskaya et al., “Can the electrochemical performance of heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes be better than that of homogeneous membranes?”, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 566, Nov. 15, 2018, pp. 54-68. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Comparative Studies on Performance of Interpolymer and Heterogeneous Ion-Exchange Membranes for Water Desalination by Electrodialysis”, Desalination 172, 2005, pp. 257-265. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Application No. 22202901.9; Office Action issued Mar. 13, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Castro-Munoz et al., “Pervaporation-Assisted Esterification Reactions by Means of Mixed Matrix Membranes,” 2018, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57: 15998-16011. [cited by applicant]
Epsztein et al., “Activation behavior for ion permeation in ion-exchange membranes: Role of ion dehydration in selective transport”, Journal of Membrane Science 580, 2019, pp. 316-326. [cited by applicant]
Kaibara et al., Study of Ion Transport across Amphoteric Ion Exchange Membrane. II. Transport of Symmetric Tetraalkylammonium Chlorides?,, Bull. Chem. Sco. Jpn, 56, 1983, pp. 1346-1350. [cited by applicant]
Scialdone et al., “Investigation of electrode material—Redox couple systems for reverse electrodialysis processes. Part I: Iron redox couples”, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2012, 681 (Supplement C), 66-75. [cited by applicant]
Seto et al., “Seawater desalination by electrodialysis”, Desalination 1978, 25 (1), 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Solveichik, “Flow batteries: current status and trends”, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (20), 11533-58. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Stillwell et al., “Predicting the specific energy consumption of reverse osmosis desalination”, Water 2016, 8 (12). [cited by applicant]
Torres et al., U.S. Appl. No. 63/127,604, filed Dec. 18, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Urban, “Emerging Scientific and Engineering Opportunities within the Water-Energy Nexus”, Joule, Dec. 20, 2017, pp. 665-688. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Energy, “Desiccant Enhanced Evaporative Air-Conditioning (DEVap): Evaluation of a New Concept in Ultra Efficient Air Conditioning”, Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-49722, 2011. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Energy, “Energy Savings Potential and RD&D Opportunities for Commercial Building HVAC Systems”, Dec. 2017, 172 pages. [cited by applicant]
US Dept. of Interior/US Geological Survey, Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2010, 2014, 64 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vermaas et al., “High Efficiency in Energy Generation from Salinity Gradients with Reverse Electrodialysis”, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1, 2013, pp. 1295-1302. [cited by applicant]
Viswanathan et al., “Cost and performance model for redox flow batteries”, Journal of Power Sources, vol. 247, Dec. 23, 2012, pp. 1040-1051. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Continuous desalination with a metal-free redox-mediator”, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, No. 7, 2019, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Woods, “Membrane processes for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 33, 2014, pp. 290-304. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Kinetic study on regeneration of Fe(II)EDTA in the wet process of NO removal”, Chemical Engineering Journal 2008, 140 (1), 130-135. [cited by applicant]
Ye et al., “Performance of a mixing entropy battery alternately flushed with wastewater effluent and seawater for recovery of salinity gradient energy”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (7), 2295-2300. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “A Natural Driven Membrane Process for Brackish and Wastewater Treatment: Photovoltaic Powered ED and FO Hybrid System”, Environmental Science and Technology, Sep. 4, 2013, pp. 10548-10555. [cited by applicant]
“Lazard's Levelized Cost of Storage—Version 2.0.” 2016, 46 pages. [cited by applicant]
Al-Jubainawi et al., “Factors governing mass transfer during membrane electrodialysis regeneration of LiCl solution for liquid desiccant dehumidification systems”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 28, Aug. 26, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Al-Karaghouli et al., “Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013, 24, 343-356. [cited by applicant]
Anderson et al., Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: Will it compete?: , Electrochimica Acta 2010, 55 (12), 3845… [cited by applicant]
Arellano et al., “Effects of pH on the degradation of aqueous ferricyanide by photolysis and photocatalysis under solar radiation”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2010, 94 (2), 327-332. [cited by applicant]
ASHRAE Standard, “Method of Testing for Rating Desiccant Dehumidifiers Utilizing Heat for the Regeneration Process”, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Bajpayee et al., “Very low temperature membrane-free desalination by directional solvent extraction”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (5), 1672. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., “A Neutral pH Aqueous Organic-Organometallic Redox Flow Battery with Extremely High Capacity Retention” ACS Energy Lett, 2017, 2, pp. 639-644. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/149,184, filed Jan. 14, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Beh et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/214,404, filed Mar. 26, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Beh, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,155, filed Jun. 24, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Benedict et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,904, filed Jan. 29, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Benedict et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/204,703, filed Mar. 17, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Benedict et al., U.S. Appl. No. 17/400,774, filed Aug. 12, 2021. [cited by applicant]
BTMAP-VI et al., “Ordering and Customer Service Neutral pH Aqueous Redox Flow Battery Materials”, Jan. 1, 2017, pp. 639. [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al., “Double-Stage Photovoltaic/Thermal ED Regeneration for Liquid Desiccant Cooling System”, Energy and Buildings, 51, 2012, pp. 64-72. [cited by applicant]
Dai, “Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models”, Nat. Clim.Change 2013, 3 (1), 52-58. [cited by applicant]
Darling et al., “Pathways to low-cost electrochemical energy storage: a comparison of aqueous and nonaqueous flow batteries”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (11), 3459-3477. [cited by applicant]
Desai et al., “Electrochemical Desalination of Seawater and Hypersaline Brines with Coupled Electricity Storage”, ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2, 2018, pp. 375-379. [cited by applicant]
Desalination Experts Group, “Desalination in the GCC”, 2014, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dipaola, “Saudi Arabia Gets Cheapest Bids for Solar Power in Auction”Bloomberg, Jan. 16, 2018, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ferguson et al., “Studies On Overvoltage. IX: The Nature of Cathode and Anode Discharge Potentials at Several Metal Surfaces1,2”, J. Phys. Chem. 1937, 42 (2), 171-190. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., “A zinc-iron redox-flow battery under $100 per kWh of system capital cost”, Energy & Environmental Science, 2015. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gong et al., All-Soluble All-Iron Aqueous Redox-Flow Battery, ACS Energy Letters, 2016, 1, pp. 89-93. [cited by applicant]
Gowin, “Examining the economics of seawater desalination using the DEEP code”, Nuclear Power Technology Development Section, I. A. E. A., Ed. Vienna, Austria, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Gu et al., “A multiple ion-exchange membrane design for redox flow batteries”, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (9), 2986. [cited by applicant]
Hilbert et al., “Correlations between the Kinetics of Electrolytic Dissolution and Deposition of Iron: I . The Anodic Dissolution of Iron”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 1971, 118 (12), 1919-1926. [cited by applicant]
Howell et al., “Overview of the DOE VTO Advanced Battery R&D Program”, Jun. 6, 2016 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hu et al, “Long-Cycling Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Battery (AORFB) toward Sustainable and Safe Energy Storage”, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (3), 1207-1214. [cited by applicant]
John et al., “Seasonal cycles of temperature, salinity and water masses of the western Arabian gulf”, Oceanol. Acta 1990, 13 (3), 273-281. [cited by applicant]
Khawaji et al., “Advances in seawater desalination technologies”, Desalination 2008, 221 (1-3), 47-69. [cited by applicant]
Konopka et al., “Diffusion coefficients of ferri- and ferrocyanide ions in aqueous media, using twin-electrode thin-layer electrochemistry”, Anal. Chem. 1970, 42 (14), 1741-1746. (no copy available). [cited by applicant]
Kozubal et al., “Low-Flow Liquid Desiccant Air-Conditioning: Demonstrated Performance and Cost Implications” NREL Technical Report, Sep. 2014, 104 pages. [cited by applicant]
La Mantia et al., “Batteries for efficient energy extraction from a water salinity difference”, Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (4), 1810-3. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Desalination of a thermal power plant wastewater by membrane capacitive deionization”, Desalination 196, 2006, pp. 125-134. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Rocking chair desalination battery based on Prussian blue electrodes”, ACS Omega 2017, 2 (4), 1653-1659. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Photovoltaic-electrodialysis regeneration method for liquid desiccant cooling system”, Solar Energy, vol. 83, 2009, pp. 2195-2204. [cited by applicant]
Logan et al., “Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water”, Nature 2012, 488, 313. [cited by applicant]
Loutatidou, et al., “Capital cost estimation of RO plants: GCC countries versus southern Europe”, Desalination 2014, 347, 103-111. [cited by applicant]
Malhotra et al., “Use cases for stationary battery technologies: A review of the literature and existing projects”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56, 2016, pp. 705-721. [cited by applicant]
Mcgovern et al., “On the cost of electrodialysis for the desalination of high salinity feeds”, Applied Energy 136, Dec. 2014, pp. 649-661. [cited by applicant]
Moore et al., “Evaporation from Brine Solutions Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions; Report 77 for the Texas Water Development Board”, May 1968, 77 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nair et al., “Water desalination and challenges: The Middle East perspective: a review”, Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51 (10-12), 2030-2040. [cited by applicant]
Oren, “Capacitive deionization (CDI) for desalination and water treatment—past, present and future (a review)”, Desalination 2008, 228 (1-3), 10-29. [cited by applicant]
Pasta et al., “A desalination battery” Nano Lett.2012, 12 (2), 839-43. [cited by applicant]
Patil et al., “Diffusivity of some zinc and cobalt salts in water”, J. Chem. Eng. Data 1993, 38 (4), 574-576. [cited by applicant]
Sadrzadeh et al., “Sea water desalination using electrodialysis”, Desalination 2008, 221 (1), 440-447. [cited by applicant]
Sata, “Application of lon Exchange Membranes. In lon Exchange Membranes: Preparation, Characterization, Modification and Application”, The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Schaetzle et al., “Salinity Gradient Energy: Current State and New Trends”, Engineering, vol. 1, Issue 2, Jun. 2016, pp. 164-166. [cited by applicant]
Scialdone et al., “Investigation of electrode material—redox couple systems for reverse electrodialysis processes—Part II: Experiments in a stack with 10-50 ce”, Journal of Electroanalystical Chemistry, vol. 704, Jun. 1… [cited by applicant]